vida y muerte del entrelazamiento - argentina.gob.ar · 2010-08-18 · hoy: entrelazamiento...
TRANSCRIPT
Vida y Muerte del Entrelazamiento Juan Pablo Paz
Departamento de Física “Juan José Giambiagi”FCEyN, UBA
Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA, UBA CONICET)
http://www.qufiba.df.uba.ar
Coloquio CNEAAgosto 13, 2010
HOY: ENTRELAZAMIENTO
ENTRELAZAMIENTOUna breve revisión. Por qué es interesante?
Entrelazamiento en sistemas cuánticos abiertos.
UN EXPERIMENTO PROPUESTO (una simulación cuántica en una trampa de iones).
UN MODELO SIMPLE EN EL QUE LA EVOLUCION DEL ENTRELAZAMIENTO NO ES TRIVIAL
Dos osciladores acoplados a un único reservorio. Dinámica para tiempos largos. Fases dinámicas.
CARACTERIZAR LA DECOHERENCIA. Tomografía de procesos cuánticos: Teoría y experimentos.
EL ENTRELAZAMIENTO ES UNA PROPIEDAD BASICA DE LA MECANICA CUANTICA
Schrödinger (1935) "Discussion of probability relations between separated systems" en Proceedings of the
Cambridge Philosophical Society
“When two systems, of which we know the states … enter into temporary physical interaction due to known forces between them, and when after a time of mutual influence the systems separate again, then
they can no longer be described in the same way as before, viz. by endowing each of them with a representative of its own.”
“As a consequence of the interaction the systems became entangled”“Vershrankung”
“I would not call that one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics, the one that enforces its entire departure from classical lines of
thought.”
Propiedades extrañas de los estados entrelazados…
1 2 Ψ 12 =12
↑ z 1↓ z 2
− ↓ z 1↑ z 2( )
Pr ob dA = ROJO( ) = Pr ob dA = VERDE( ) =12
Pr ob dB = ROJO( ) = Pr ob dB = VERDE( ) =12
ALEATORIEDAD COMPLETA EN LABOS A Y B
Propiedades:dA
Labo AdB
Labo B
Pr ob dA = ROJO ; dB = ROJO( ) = Pr ob dA = VERDE ; dB = VERDE( ) =14
1 − ˆ d A • ˆ d B( )Pr ob dA = ROJO ; dB = VERDE( ) = Pr ob dA = VERDE ; dB = ROJO( ) =
14
1 + ˆ d A • ˆ d B( )
CORRELACIONES FUERTES ENTRE A Y BLas correlaciones admitidas por los estados entrelazados son DEMASIADO
FUERTES: incompatibles con cualquier modelo ‘realista y local’.
EINSTEIN (EPR): LOS ESTADOS ENTRELAZADOS NOS MUESTRAN QUE LA MECANICA CUANTICA LLEVA LA
SEMILLA DE SU PROPIA DESTRUCCION!“Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen.Physical Review 47, 1935, 777-780.
Two particles (A and B) in an entangled state: Eigenstate of total momentum and relative coordinate (two commuting observables).
Measuring position in Lab A we predict position in Lab B (no disturbance in B).Measuring momentum in Lab A we predict momentum in Lab B (no disturbance in B).
Therefore: Position and momentum must be “written” in the stuff that is in Lab B (nothing in Lab B can depend on what I decide to do in Lab A!!).
Therefore: Quantum Mechanics is incomplete
CUALQUIER teoría que acepte el “realismo local” da lugar a predicciones cuantitativas (desigualdades de Bell)
que pueden ser testeadas en experimentos.
La mecánica cuántica predice violaciones a las desigualdades de Bell (para estados entrelazados).
EXPERIMENTOS DE DETECCION DE VIOLACIONES A DESIGUALDADES DE BELL (Aspect 1982,…)
•Fuente de pares de objetos entrelazados•Separar los objetos de modo tal que no se des-entrelacen
FUENTES• LUZ
• MATERIAX
Kwiat et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337 (1995)
BBO-Kristall
UV-Pump
+| ⟩ | ⟩H VA A| ⟩ | ⟩V HB B
AB
V
H
kpump = kphoton1 + kphoton2
wpump = wphoton1 + wphoton2
The evolution of SPDC polarization-entanglement
01
10100
1,00010,000
100,0001,000,000
10,000,000
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Rep
orte
d ra
te (s
-1)
BBOBBO
AliceAlice
LaserLaser
BobBob
PICT 2004 ANPCyT objetivos:•Armar una fuente de fotones entrelazados,
un sistema de detección y manipulación•Caracterizar la fuente detectando violación
de desigualdades de Bell•Realizar experimentos originales de
manipulación de información cuántica (algoritmos cuánticos)
Primera evidencia de violaciones a desigualdades de Bell detectada en Argentina. Febrero de 2009.
QM: es válida aquí también!- 5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 0 0- 1 0 0
0
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
5 0 0
6 0 0
7 0 0
8 0 0
Coi
ncid
enci
as
β ( g r a d o s )
α = 0 º α = 4 5 º α = 9 0 º a = 1 3 5 º
S=2.72 (0.06)
FOTONES ENTRELAZADOS EN BUENOS AIRES!!Colaboración QUFIBA-CEILAP (Citefa)
Christian Schmiegelow, Miguel Larotonda, Alejandro Hnilo
ES UN RECURSO FISICO!SIGLO XXI: GENERALCION,
MANIPULACION Y CONTROL DEL ENTRELAZAMIENTO EN ESCALA
MACROSCOPICA
(2010)TELEPORTACION
DISTRIBUCION CUANTICA DE CLAVESCOMPUTACION CUANTICA
PERO HOY EL ENTRELAZAMIENTO NO SOLAMENTE ES UNA FUENTE DE SORPRESAS PARA DISCUSIONES FUNDAMENTALES…
TELEPORTACION
Entrelzamiento
Teleportación in an ion trap: Wineland et al; Blatt et al
(Nature, 2004)
Environment
System
…
Environment
…
System
HOY: Evolución del entrelazamiento en un sistema cuántico abierto?
• Entrelazamiento entre grados de libertad de traslación de dos partículas. Un sistema sencillo con evolución compleja
• Tres “fases dinámicas” para la evolución del entrelazamiento (y su detección en experimentos de trampas de iones).
POR QUE NO EXISTEN HOY TECNOLOGIAS CUANTICAS VIABLES ?(BASADAS EN EL
USO DEL ENTRELAZAMIENTO)ES CULPA DE LA DECOHERENCIA
(que induce des-entrelazamiento y la transición cuántico-clásica)
Environment
System
… …
HOW TO FIGHT AGAINST DECOHERENCEANTES: NUESTRO PRIMER EXPERIMENTO ORIGINAL
Cómo caracterizar eficientemente el proceso de decoherencia que sufre un sistema cuántico?
PRIMERA IMPLEMENTACION EXPERIMENTAL DE UN NUEVO METODO PARA “TOMOGRAFIA DE PROCESOS CUANTICOS”
Para ver esta película, debedisponer de QuickTime™ y de
un descompresor .
“Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen.
Physical Review 47, 1935, 777-780.
Entangled states of two particles
r r =
r r 1 −
r r 2 ;
r P =
r P 1 +
r P 2
Ψ 12 =r r =
r r 0 ;
r P =
r P 0
Ψr r ,
r P ( ) = δ
r r −
r r 0( )δ
r P −
r P 0( )
1 2
These are non-physical states. A set of physical (yet entangled) states:Two mode squeezed states.
a 12
= x 12
+ i p 12
; Ψ 12 = exp r a 1+ a 2
+ − a 1 a 2( )( ) 0 12
m Ω δ x −
δ p −
=δ p +
m Ω δ x +
= exp 2 r( )
δ x −
δ p −δ x +
δ p +Gaussian states with finite entanglement
Measure of entanglement E=2r
Can be transfered to spins by means of local operations (in two distant labs) and then use
it for teleportation, etc…
PREVIEW: ANIMALS IN THE ZOO OF SOLUTIONS (NUMERICS)
Environment
System
…
Zero temperature, ohmic environment
It is possible to have entanglement in the
final state! Induced by the environment.
Environment
System
… …
THE ENTANGLEMENT MEASURE
We restrict to cinsider initial Gaussian states (to get analytic results). They remain Gaussiann.
REDUCED STATE OF THE SYSTEM IS CHARACTERIZED BY COVARIANCE MATRIX “V”
Entanglement measure: Logarithmic Negativity
: minimum symplectic eigenvalue of the partially transpose covariance matrix
Assumptions: 1. Linear system
2. Continuum spectral density
3. Gaussian states
Environment
System
…
THE MODEL: CALDEIRA-LEGGETT
THE SOLUTION
Resonant oscillatorsEnvironment
ALMOST IDENTICAL TO THE USUAL “QUANTUM BROWNIAN MOTION” MODEL
INTEGRATING OUT (TRACING OUT) THE ENVIRONMENT WE OBTAIN AN EXACT MASTER EQUATION
Damping term Normal diffusion Anomalous diffusionRenormalized Hamiltonian
Ohmic environment J ω( )= 2mγ ωπ
θ Λ −ω( )→ 2mγ ωπ
; γ t( )→ γ t >> Λ−1( )high TD → 2mγT
f → − 2γTπΩ
log Λ + ΩΛ − Ω
T=0
D→mγΩ+2mγ2
π2logΛ
Ω−1
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
f →2γπ
logΛΩ
Asymptotic regime: ,
A PROPERTY OF THE SOLUTION
CONSIDER THE ASYMPTOTIC STATE FOR QUANTUM BROWNIAN MOTION
Δp =D2γ
; ΩRΔx =D
2m2γ−
fm
K =p2
2m=
D4mγ
V =12
mΩR2 x 2 =
D4mγ
−f2
rc =12
log mΩRΔxΔp
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ =
14
log 1−2mγ f
D⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
ASYMPTOTIC STATE VIOLATES EQUIPARTITION!
ASYMPTOTIC STATE IS SQUEEZED!!
QUANTUM WEIRDNESS??
FOLLOWS FROM MASTER EQUATION… COEFFICIENT f IS THE ONE TO BLAME!
In the asymptotic regime:
The equilibrium state is squeezed due to f (low temperature regime)
THEN THE ASYMPTOTIC FORM OF THE COVARIANCE MATRIX IS
V =
Free oscillator of mass m and frequency
Correlations between the oscillators are zero in the asymptotic regime
Equilibrium moments of oscillator
COMPUTING ENTANGLEMENT FOR LONG TIMES
EVALUATE ANALYTICALLY THE LOGARITHMIC NEGATIVITY FOR THE OSCILLATORS
ENTANGLEMENT IN THE ASYMPTOTIC STATE
˜ E N → Maximal Sqeezing( )− Entropy( )ΔEN → Minimal Sqeezing( )
WE CONCLUDE THAT THERE ARE THREE QUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIORS!!
Mean value:
Amplitude of oscillations:
Where:
Squeezing of the oscillator
Squeezing of equilibrium for the oscillator
Analytical expressions can be obtained for the asymptotic values of the coefficients of the master equation for an ohmic environment. We can use them to construct a phase diagram
Phase diagram (complete description of the asymptotic behavior) :
Accurately describe all numerically simulations !
THREE DYNAMICAL PHASES FOR ENTANGLEMENT
Interesting points in the phase diagram :
T0 is such that Δx T =T0
=h
2mΩ
Δx
r1 is such that
r1 = log
h
2 m ΩΔ x T = 0( )
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟
r 2 = logΔ p T = 0( )
m Ω h
2
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟
r1 =12
log π2
1 − γ 2 / Ω 2
arccos γ / Ω( )⎛
⎝ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ ⎟ r1 =
12
log 1 − 4 γ 2 / Ω 2
1 − γ 2 / Ω 2arccos γ / Ω( ) +
4π
γΩ
log ΛΩ
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
⎛
⎝ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ ⎟
THREE DYNAMICAL PHASES FOR ENTANGLEMENT
THREE DYNAMICAL PHASES FOR ENTANGLEMENT
SDR region (also non-Markovian) decreases width for ohmic environment as .
1Λ
Entanglement in the NSD Island COMES FROM the squeezing of the equilibrium state! (from the environment)
NSD Island: Non Markovian, non perturbative
SD region: entanglement dies because entropy is too large.
NSD “continent”: entanglement persists because it is in a protected state.
˜ E N → Maximal Sqeezing( )− Entropy( )ΔEN → Minimal Sqeezing( )
HOW TO OBSERVE THESE PHASES IN AN ION TRAP\
•Three ions ina linear trap
• Central ion (dffierent species) continuously laser cooled. Central ion is the gate to a dissipative channel (sympathetic cooling)
• Central ion copules to TWO normal modes only (we use radial modes; breathing mode is decoupled from the environment)
Environment
…
System System
H =p i
2
2 m i
+12
m iω x2 x j
2 + m iω z2 z i
2( )⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
i∑ +
e 2
4 π ε 0
1
x i − x j( )2+ z i − z j( )2
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟ i
∑
d eq =5
16 ε 0
e 2
m ω z
, H =p i
2
2 m ii∑ +
m2
γ ij x i x jij
∑ ; γ ij =e 2
2 π ε 0 z i − z j( )3
Ý ρ = − i H , ρ[ ] +Γ2
2 a ρ a + − a + a ρ − ρ a + a( )a → CM − mod e
Δ p +2 =
11
2 mc 1
2
ω 1
+c 3
2
ω 3
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
Δ x +2 =
m2
ω 1c 12 + ω 3 c 3
2( )
rcirt =12
ln m ν 2Δ x +
Δ p +
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
S cirt =12
ln 4 Δ x + Δ p + δ q − δ p −( )
ENTRANGLEMENT OF MOTIONAL DEGRESS OF FREEDOM
World recordTwo Be atoms separated about 1mm
January 2009 (D. Wineland, NIST Boulder)
Una hamaca de 7 átomos de Calcio
52 átomos de Calcio “fotografiados”
Una acordeón de 7 átomos de CalcioCa: R. Blatt (Innsbruck)
*** F. Schmidt-Kahler (Ulm)
Be: D. Wineland (NIST, Boulder)
Ba: C. Monroe (Maryland)
Etc, etc…
A POSSIBLE EXPERIMENT IN AN ION TRAP
A ROUGH GUIDE THROUGH THE EXPERIMENT
• Three ions are cooled, y-potential is tight. Radial (x) modes are used for the simulation.
• Then central ion is cooled continuously. This cools two normal modes. “Temperature”: free parameter
• Squeezing of radial mode is created by varying x-trap frequency. Initial squeezing is free parameter.
• Final state dispersions are measured (or vibrational x-state is transferred to the internal degree of freedom and
fluorescence experiment is performed)
System System
24 Mg 24 Mg9Beωx =1.68ωz ⇒ rcrit ≈0.75, Scrit ≈0.32ωx =2.2ωz ⇒ rcrit ≈0.47, Scrit ≈0.40
A POSSIBLE EXPERIMENT IN AN ION TRAP
Entanglement can be transferred to the internal degree of freedom (qubit). How? Using sequence of pulses (state dependent forces)?
How many pulses? Three or four is enough. How much entanglement transferred? (dotted lines)
System System
24 Mg 24 Mg9Beωx =1.68ωz ⇒rcrit ≈0.75, Scrit ≈0.32ωx =2.2ωz ⇒rcrit ≈0.47, Scrit ≈0.40
CONCLUSION: NON TRIVIAL ENTANGLEMENT DYNAMICS CAN BE OBSERVED IN AN ION TRAP
Environment
System
…
System System
24 Mg 24 Mg9Be