mstp surf presentation

16
Behavior of Cardiac Cells When Exposed to Different Formulations of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix MSTP-SURF 2015 Sarah Albrecht, University of Washington-Seattle UCSD Department of Bioengineering, Christman Lab

Upload: sarah-albrecht

Post on 14-Apr-2017

227 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MSTP SURF Presentation

Behavior of Cardiac Cells When Exposed to Different Formulations of Decellularized Extracellular MatrixMSTP-SURF 2015Sarah Albrecht, University of Washington-Seatt leUCSD Department of Bioengineering, Christman Lab

Page 2: MSTP SURF Presentation

Myocardial Infarction (MI) Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States killing an estimated 600,000 people each year.¹

Left Ventricle (LV) remodeling post-MI◦ Decrease in cardiomyocytes ◦ Degradation of the extracellular matrix of LV◦ Thinning of the LV wall◦ Eventually causes heart failure in the future

Only therapy for heart failure is a heart transplant

Infarcted heart and LV hours after MI

Infarcted heart and LV days after MI

1. Heron, M. Natl. Vital Stat. 2013

Page 3: MSTP SURF Presentation

Therapies for Post-MI Ventricular Constraint

◦ Mechanical device or synthetic material that encompasses the heart to limit ventricular dilation

Injectable Biomaterial◦ Injecting a biomaterial gel in

the infarct area with specific cells or biomolecules

Cardiac Patch◦ Placement of a biomaterial

sheet seeded either with specific cells or biomolecules over the infarct area

Rane, A. a. & Christman, K. L. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011

Page 4: MSTP SURF Presentation

Extracting Myocardial Decellularized ECM

Wang, R. M. & Christman, K. L. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015

Reduced negative LV remodeling and improved heart function¹

Decellularized ECM has been shown to be biocompatible²

1. Sonya B. Seif-Naraghi et al. Science Translational Medicine. 20132. Jennifer M. Singelyn et al. Biomaterials. 2009

Page 5: MSTP SURF Presentation

Extracting Myocardial Decellularized ECM

Can be separated into soluble and insoluble components

Page 6: MSTP SURF Presentation

Project Overview Research Goal:

◦ Improve our understand of how the soluble component of the ECM hydrogel affects cell viability and migration.

Grow CPCs and HUVECs to a desired cell confluences

Isolate soluble ECM component

Plate cells with soluble ECM for

Viability and Migration assay

Analyze both cell lines appropriately to determine cell

survival and movement

Page 7: MSTP SURF Presentation

1. Plate CPCs and HUVECs 2. Prepare various H2O2 concentrations (n=4 or 6)

3. Add Alamar Blue in wells and incubate for 4

hours

4. Record the fluorescence of each well with plate reader

Viability Assay

Page 8: MSTP SURF Presentation

Migration Assay

1. Serum starve CPCs for 24 hours

2. Fluorescently label cells

3. Add media and cell solution into transwell of a 24-well plate

4. Count fluorescent cells to determine how many migrated

Page 9: MSTP SURF Presentation

CPC Viability 4 hours at 50,000 cells

Results:◦ SS and soluble ECM have

higher viability than SF◦ Survival of CPCs at high

H2O2 concentrations

Page 10: MSTP SURF Presentation

CPC Viability 8 hours at 25,000 cells

Parameters Changed:◦ Longer incubation time◦ Lower amount of cells per well

Results:◦ No viable cells at higher H2O2

◦ No significance between SS and SF

Page 11: MSTP SURF Presentation

HUVEC Viability 4 hours at 50,000 cells

Results:◦ SF higher than SS◦ Viable cells at higher H2O2

concentrations

Page 12: MSTP SURF Presentation

HUVEC Viability 8 hours at 25,000 cells

Parameters Changed:◦ Incubation time◦ Cell concentration◦ Media

Results:◦ No viable cells at higher

H2O2

◦ Significance between SS and SF no HE

Page 13: MSTP SURF Presentation

Migration Assay with CPCSS SF

6 mg/mL 24 mg/mL

Parameters:◦ Cells counted twice to reduce error◦ Images captured at 6 hours after initial plating◦ n=3

Page 14: MSTP SURF Presentation

Conclusion Viability Assay

◦ Increasing the incubation time, decreasing the cell concentration and using media without added molecules such as Heparin and E.C.G. affected cell survival

◦ Soluble ECM appears to not be detrimental to CPCs and HUVECs

Migration Assay◦ Soluble ECM encourages cell migration however it is not as affective as the SS media◦ At a higher concentration of the soluble ECM, more cell movement was observed compared to lower

concentrations of the ECM

The ECM can be a suitable injectable biomaterial therapy to treat the infarct region

Page 15: MSTP SURF Presentation

Future Directions Soluble ECM

◦ Continue with cell studies for ECM hydrogel◦ Preform an angiogenesis assay to observe vessel formation

and cell-cell interactions

Insoluble ECM◦ Perform more cell studies on different

formulations of the insoluble ECM◦ Pellet form vs ECM hydrogel

Control Sol ECM

Images captured by JG Wang, R. M. & Christman, K. L. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015

Page 16: MSTP SURF Presentation

Acknowledgements Christman Lab

◦ Dr. Karen Christman◦ Dr. Mary Nguyen◦ Dr. Roberto Gaetani◦ Masaki Fujita◦ Rebecca Barden◦ Jessica Ungerleider◦ Melissa Hernandez◦ Raymond Wang◦ Heinz Strassle◦ Hillary Lam◦ Cori Espelien◦ Julian Garcia

MSTP-SURF Program◦ Dr. Robert Ross◦ Ryan Moore◦ Mary Alice Kiisel◦ Jennifer Dumdie◦ Aran Groves◦ Cindy Liu◦ Eulanca Liu

MSTP-SURF Participants◦ Pamela Capellan◦ Angel Diaz◦ Luis Gasca◦ Maryam Ige

◦ Kamren Livingston◦ Mauricio Mrquez

Palencia◦ Isaac Padilla◦ Assata Pyatt◦ Jasmine Rice◦ Ceciley Scarbrough