acee 2011 presentation 31-4-2001

8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 1/25

Infrastructure

System &Process

People

Technology and Education



Backgro d



Th r ar 87 SMART

chool thro gho t

Malay ia

Backgro d



Backgro d



` Aft r 14 y ar of impl m tatio and m ch d of r o r ces, the ambitio s plan of making all Malaysian schools to become Smart School not only stagnatedb t r egr essed.

` Even the pilot Smart Schools have r everted back toµthe old way¶ of teaching and lear ning.

` Teacher s¶ of these pilot schools after being promisedwith µthe excitement¶ became demotivated.

` Ther e is no diff er ence in the performance of the SmartSchools compar ed with the normal schools.



School Performance

Teacher

T&Lmaterial

Syllab s & Infr a

Attit de & Aptit de

Knowledge & Skills

Psychology



` To identify the vario s f actor s that contrib te toteacher s¶ performance.

` To statistically validate concept al model r elatingthese f actor s.

` To cr eate a Management Sim lation Lab

The objective



Leadership

Environment

Belongingness

Personal Dev.

Collegiality

Personal

Reward

Cohesive

Pride

P

E

R

F

0

R

M

A

N

C

E

Morale Det.Performance

Morale Status



Staff Morale

» Per sonal Reward

» Cohesive Pride

Job Performance

»Job Role

»Job Accomplishment

»Wor k Habit

Morale Determinant Scale

Leader ship

Belongingness

Environment

Per sonal development

Collegiality

Respondents are required to ratetheir perceptions on a seven point

Likert scale



Constructs Cronbach Alpha Coefficient

Morale

1. Cohesive Pride 0.917

2. Personal Reward 0.926

Morale Determinant

1. Leadership 0.928

2. Belongingness 0.835

3. Environment 0.786

4. Personal Development 0.866

5. Collegiality 0.840

Job Performance 0.907



Variables Number Percentage (%)

GENDER

MaleFemale

41

51

44.6

55.4

AGE

20 to 40 years

41 to 50

POSITION

Management (Senior Assistance

and µKetua Bidang¶)

Ordinary Teachers

52

40

36

58

56.5

43.5

39.1

60.9

Teacher s from 4 SMART schools in

Ser emban



Leadership

Environment

Belongingness

Personal Dev.

Collegiality

Personal

Reward

Cohesive

Pride

P

E

R

F

0

R

M

A

N

C

E

The significance of the relationships were tested using the SPSS

AMOS software version 5.0



Causing construct Caused construct Std Coefficient p-value

Environment K6 Personal Reward 0.27 0.052

Personal development K7 Personal Reward 0.36 0.013

Collegiality K8 Personal Reward 0.05 0.047

Leadership K2 Cohesive Pride 0.013 0.051

Belongingness K3 Cohesive Pride 0.22 0.011

Environment K4 Cohesive Pride 0.414 0.001

Personal development K5 Cohesive Pride 0.74 0.000

Personal Reward F3 Cohesive Pride 0.17 0.05

Leadership K1 Performance 0.54 0.000

Personal Reward F1 Performance 0.13 0.04

Cohesive Pride F2 Performance 0.11 0.04



Per sonal r eward = 0.27(Environment) + 0.36(Per sonal

Development) + 0.05(Collegiality) + Error

Cohesive Pride = 0.013(Leader ship) + 0.22(Belongingness) +

0.41(Environment) + 0.74(Per sonal Development) + 0.17(Per sonal

Reward) + Error

Performance = 0.54(Leader ship) + 0.13(Per sonal Reward) + 0.11

(Cohesive Pride) + Error

Goodness of Fit measures of the structural model

Cmin/df = 2.21 ; GFI = 0.89 ; AGFI = 0.89 ; NFI = 0.88; Std RMSEA = 0.07



The str ct r al equation

Cohesive Pride = 0.013(Leader ship) + 0.22(Belongingness) +

0.41(Environment) + 0.74(Per sonal Development) + 0.17(Per sonal

Reward) + Error

Performance = 0.54(Leader ship) + 0.13(Per sonal Reward) + 0.11

(Cohesive Pride) + Error

Goodness of Fit measures of the structural model

Cmin/df = 2.21 ; GFI = 0.89 ; AGFI = 0.89 ; NFI = 0.88; Std RMSEA = 0.07



Display Gr aph

Per sonal Reward

Cohesive Pride

Performance

Leader ship

Environment

Belongingness

Per sonal Dev

Collegiality

Enter the Values

SubmitSensitivity



Performance

Leader ship



The findings of this study suggested that administr ator s

need to pay close attention to the f actor s aff ecting the mor ale of the teacher s since it is evident that these f actor s have significant influence on their mor ale status and jobperformance.



` The spirit of teamwor k needs to be inculcated and the management needs to provide avenue for r ewardingteamwor k.

` Cr eate a conducive wor king environment by fosteringteamwor k and constr uctive competition.

` Visionary leader ship that can set a clear dir ection is vital.

`

Reward teacher s¶ cr eative contribution.` Instill the sense of belongingness amongst teacher s by

providing opportunity to take pride in their wor k.

` Promote collegiality, wher e teacher s ar e encour aged toshar e the r esponsibilities.

` Provide ample opportunity for per sonal development inthe form of tr aining and development.



Questions and comments ar e welcome

acee 2011 presentation 31-4-2001

Documents