1600-000-000-rpt-0001.r2
TRANSCRIPT
KUWAIT OIL COMPANY (K.S.C.)
Project EF/1600
1600-000-000-RPT-0001
PHSER Stage 2
Report
R2 20/01/10 For use/ Action (Revised in line with Scope change)
MB Project RF
R1 9th March 2008
For use/Action JL Projects DS
Rev Date Revision By Chk’d Section PE Client
Project Number Document Number Rev Date Sheet
EF/1600
1600-000-000-RPT-0001 R2 20th Jan
2010 2 of 9
S:\EF1600\EF1600_Common\DCC\EF1600- ITB Package\Att 1 - Project Specific Documents\1. South Kuwait Facilities\1.1 Common to All\HSE\EF1600 PHSER Stage 2 Report 20-01-10 Rev.2.doc
1.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE
To review the planning and preparedness of the project “Elevated Substations in SEK” (EF1600) before entering the Detailed Design Stage as part of Contract Action. The review will be conducted in accordance with KOC.GE.050.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The review team was held as a single meeting with personnel present from the FEED design Team, Controlling Team and Asset support teams; refer to attendees below. The review was conducted in the PMC FEED office in Wynyard on Wednesday 20
th January 2010.
It was noted that there was no specific HSE Team representation at the meeting which is contrary to KOC-GE-050. The meeting agreed to proceed with the review and issue the report to all concerned HSE Teams for review. Any further action or review would be discussed between Controlling and HSE Teams following this. No PHSER 1 report was available for the meeting to review. The team briefly reviewed the project and the requirements for PHSER#1 and concluded to continue with the PHSER Stage 2 review on the basis that the process and facilities are not novel to KOC and they are all within existing operating areas. Thus existing KOC Safety Management Systems were deemed to be adequate to manage HSE risks through the project cycle. The check list from Appendix 2 of KOC.GE.050 was reviewed by the team, with the FEED and Controlling Teams responses to what has and will be completed recorded. Documentation prepared for Technical Specification for the Detailed Design Stage was reviewed when reviewing project specific deliverables and referenced where applicable to support the information provided by the teams. Recommendations that arose during the review were categorized as follows
Minor: some small shortcomings or possible improvements identified, e.g. slight deviation from good practice, or minor factual or textual error, or possible improvement for future projects which should be noted and addressed by a brief comment or as part of the documentation updates, but which are expected to have little HSE risk impact. Appropriate responses to Project specific issues should be addressed during the execution of the Project Medium: more significant shortcomings in the information, basis, design, analysis or safety justifications or arrangements, which will require further analysis or clarification, and which may have a small but noticeable impact on the HSE risks. A clear action plan should be developed to address Medium issues prior to the submission of Tenders so that the Contract Scope of Work can be adequately defined. Major: potentially serious shortcomings in the information, basis, design, analysis or safety justifications or arrangements, which are critical to the HSE risks and safety demonstration and which will require urgent attention. These will impact the services and thus cost for the EPC Contractor. These must be fully closed out prior to the issue of the ITB.
The team findings were recorded as shown in the PHSER 2 worksheets below. The team thus
Project Number Document Number Rev Date Sheet
EF/1600
1600-000-000-RPT-0001 R2 20th Jan
2010 3 of 9
S:\EF1600\EF1600_Common\DCC\EF1600- ITB Package\Att 1 - Project Specific Documents\1. South Kuwait Facilities\1.1 Common to All\HSE\EF1600 PHSER Stage 2 Report 20-01-10 Rev.2.doc
agreed that at the time of the meeting the notes taken were an accurate reflection of the comments made during the review. The Controlling Team PE will be responsible for ensuring that all recommendations are responded to or transferred to a responsible team in a timely manner for consideration.
3.0 FNDINGS
A total of 7 recommendations have been made, 5 of which fall into the Medium category. No Major Category recommendations were made. The lack of a PHSER Stage 1 review did not appear to have prevented the correct, health, safety and environmental procedures being implemented during the FEED stage.
4.0 TEAM MEMBERS
NAME POSITION E-MAIL
Jim Martin
Project Engineer PMC-AMEC
Meshari Al-Bader
Associate Project Engineer PMC-AMEC
Rechard Punter
Lead Const. Eng. PMC-AMEC
Les Smalls
Lead Elect. Eng. PMC-AMEC
David Sullivan
Lead Inst. Eng. PMC-AMEC
Abdul Hadi AlZuabi
Senior Engineer
KOC-MP VIII
Nasser Al-Attar
Elect Eng Specialist KOC – Main. SK
Rashid Aldosari
Inst. Eng KOC – Main. SK
Ali Shams Elect Eng
KOC – OTS (SEK)
P
roje
ct N
um
ber
Docum
ent N
um
ber
Rev
Date
S
heet
E
F/1
600
1600-0
00-0
00-R
PT
-0001
R2
20
th J
an
2010
4 o
f 9
S:\
EF
16
00
\EF
16
00
_C
om
mo
n\D
CC
\EF
16
00
- IT
B P
acka
ge
\Att
1 -
Pro
ject
Sp
ecific
Do
cu
me
nts
\1.
So
uth
Ku
wa
it F
acili
tie
s\1
.1 C
om
mo
n t
o A
ll\H
SE
\EF
16
00
PH
SE
R S
tag
e 2
Re
po
rt 2
0-
01
-10
Re
v.2
.do
c
4.0
P
HS
ER
2 W
OR
KS
HE
ET
S
Item
P
HS
ER
Acti
vit
y
PH
SE
R C
om
men
t O
bserv
ati
on
/Reco
mm
en
dati
on
P
rio
rity
B
y
1
To
co
nfi
rm
that
all
H
SE
co
ncern
s
rela
tin
g
to
the
ch
ara
cte
risti
cs o
f th
e f
ull
lif
ecycle
of
the
pro
ject,
no
vel
tech
no
log
y an
d th
e n
atu
re o
f th
e lo
cati
on
h
ave b
een
id
en
tifi
ed
1.1
R
evie
w
the
health,
safe
ty
and
environm
enta
l hazard
s
inhere
nt
in t
he p
roposed d
evelo
pm
ent
to e
nsure
adeq
uate
id
entification o
f th
ose h
azard
s t
hat
warr
ant
specia
l att
ention
or
furt
her
investig
ation.
Confirm
that
accepta
ble
solu
tions
are
availa
ble
or
are
capable
of
bein
g d
evelo
ped w
ithin
the
tim
escale
and o
rganis
ation o
f th
e p
roposed p
roje
ct.
T
opic
s
consid
ere
d t
ypic
ally
inclu
de:
1.1
a
Pro
pert
ies
of
the
pro
cess
mate
rials
(M
SD
Ss
are
re
quired f
or
all
raw
mate
rials
, pro
ducts
and inte
rmedia
te
str
eam
s)
Pro
ject
is n
ot
involv
ed d
irectly w
ith t
he p
rocess u
nits.
Serv
ice b
uild
ing
s c
onta
in m
ate
rials
such a
s H
VA
C a
nd
transfo
rmer
oils
, batt
eries,
die
sel etc
for
whic
h M
SD
S
already e
xis
t.
1.1
b
Reactive c
hem
icals
mix
ing
matr
ix
Not
applic
able
– n
on p
rocess u
nits.
1.1
c
Pro
cessin
g
conditio
ns
(norm
al,
sta
rt-u
p,
shutd
ow
n
&
excurs
ion)
N/A
no p
rocessin
g o
f m
ate
rials
.
1.1
d
Pro
cess i
nvento
ries,
fire
and e
xplo
sio
n p
ote
ntial, s
tore
d
energ
y,
toxic
rele
ase p
ote
ntial.
Min
imal q
uantities o
f m
ate
rials
in 1
.1a a
bove.
1.1
e
Occupational health /
health m
anag
em
ent.
N
o n
ew
mate
rials
– e
xis
ting
KO
C c
ontr
ols
will
apply
.
1.1
f Im
pact
on G
roup P
olic
ies,
targ
ets
and s
trate
gie
s.
No c
oncern
s identified.
1.1
g
Pro
ject
str
ate
gy f
or
inhere
ntly s
afe
r desig
n
Pro
ject
impro
ves s
afe
ty b
y e
levation s
witch r
oom
.
1.1
h
Tra
nsport
ation h
azard
s /
ris
ks.
N
o t
ransport
ation identified f
or
pro
cess h
azard
s.
1.2
R
evie
w
pro
ject
pla
ns
to
colle
ct
info
rmation
on
pre
vio
us
incid
ents
and t
o a
ddre
ss t
hem
in t
he d
esig
n.
Lessons learn
ed e
xerc
ises p
erf
orm
ed a
nd input
into
P
roje
ct.
M
inute
s o
f m
eeting
pro
duced a
s a
record
C
aptu
re o
f pro
ject
execution issues f
rom
FM
P P
roje
cts
(b
row
nfield
modific
ations)
by r
evie
w o
f docum
enta
tion b
y
P
roje
ct N
um
ber
Docum
ent N
um
ber
Rev
Date
S
heet
E
F/1
600
1600-0
00-0
00-R
PT
-0001
R2
20
th J
an
2010
5 o
f 9
S:\
EF
16
00
\EF
16
00
_C
om
mo
n\D
CC
\EF
16
00
- IT
B P
acka
ge
\Att
1 -
Pro
ject
Sp
ecific
Do
cu
me
nts
\1.
So
uth
Ku
wa
it F
acili
tie
s\1
.1 C
om
mo
n t
o A
ll\H
SE
\EF
16
00
PH
SE
R S
tag
e 2
Re
po
rt 2
0-
01
-10
Re
v.2
.do
c
Item
P
HS
ER
Acti
vit
y
PH
SE
R C
om
men
t O
bserv
ati
on
/Reco
mm
en
dati
on
P
rio
rity
B
y
pers
onnel in
volv
ed f
rom
FM
P p
lanned f
or
futu
re b
y r
evie
w
of
Pro
ject
docum
enta
tion a
nd d
raw
ing
s.
1.3
R
evie
w t
he im
pact
of
the p
roposed d
evelo
pm
ent
on e
xis
ting
fa
cili
ties,
and v
ice v
ers
a,
both
onsite a
nd o
ffsite.
Revie
w
the inte
rfaces b
etw
een n
ew
and e
xis
ting
facili
ties.
Environm
enta
l – p
relim
inary
EIA
develo
ped a
nd a
ppro
ved
by K
uw
ait E
PA
. S
afe
ty –
QR
A n
ot
pla
nned f
or
this
sta
ge;
will
be c
om
ple
ted
during
Deta
il desig
n b
y E
PC
Contr
acto
r.
QR
A f
rom
FM
P
revie
wed a
s p
art
of
the d
evelo
pm
ent
of
FE
ED
Docum
ents
, part
icula
rly w
ith r
espect
to s
ubsta
tion locations.
Spacin
g o
f eq
uip
ment
is t
o C
om
pany layout
sta
ndard
s.
Ris
k a
ssessm
ent
carr
ied o
ut
for
MA
A-M
52 s
ubsta
tion
location.
1.4
R
evie
w
the
pro
posed
location
to
ensure
th
at
any
chara
cte
ristics
of
specia
l H
SE
concern
have
been
acknow
ledg
ed,
e.g
. sta
kehold
ers
, lo
cal
popula
tion,
local
environm
ent,
sensitiv
e
recepto
rs,
geog
raphic
al
featu
res,
hydro
log
y,
bio
div
ers
ity,
mete
oro
log
ical conditio
ns e
tc.
See 1
.3 a
bove.
1.5
R
evie
w d
raft
constr
uction p
hilo
sophy i
nclu
din
g n
um
bers
in
work
forc
e,
access
to
site,
inte
ractions
with
exis
ting
opera
tions,
sig
nific
ant
hazard
s and environm
enta
l im
pact
likely
to b
e e
ncounte
red d
uring
constr
uction,
inclu
din
g u
se
of
substa
nces/m
ate
rials
hazard
ous t
o h
ealth a
nd a
lso t
he
applic
ation
of
specia
l H
ealth,
Safe
ty
and
Environm
enta
l Leg
isla
tion.-
.
Constr
uction a
ctivitie
s w
ere
inclu
ded in p
relim
inary
EIA
. C
onstr
uction involv
es k
now
n t
ypes o
f m
ate
rials
and e
xis
ting
te
chniq
ues.
Constr
ucta
bili
ty r
evie
w w
ill b
e c
arr
ied o
ut
on 2
1/0
1/2
010.
1.6
R
evie
w t
he e
xpecte
d e
mis
sio
ns p
rofile
. T
he f
ollo
win
g w
ill
typic
ally
need
to
be
consid
ere
d
over
the
full
rang
e
of
possib
le
conditio
ns,
i.e.
ste
ady
sta
te,
sta
rt-u
p
shutd
ow
n,
em
erg
ency r
ele
ase,
norm
al, m
axim
um
, end o
f ru
n,
etc
.:
1.6
a
Vents
, oily
w
aste
s,
waste
wate
r,
hazard
ous
&
non-
hazard
ous s
olid
s &
slu
dg
e
New
build
ing
s w
ill b
e t
ied into
exis
ting
sew
era
ge s
yste
ms.
N
o incre
ase in p
ers
onnel.
Tra
nsfo
rmer
bunds /
dra
ins c
overe
d b
y d
rain
pits.
P
roje
ct N
um
ber
Docum
ent N
um
ber
Rev
Date
S
heet
E
F/1
600
1600-0
00-0
00-R
PT
-0001
R2
20
th J
an
2010
6 o
f 9
S:\
EF
16
00
\EF
16
00
_C
om
mo
n\D
CC
\EF
16
00
- IT
B P
acka
ge
\Att
1 -
Pro
ject
Sp
ecific
Do
cu
me
nts
\1.
So
uth
Ku
wa
it F
acili
tie
s\1
.1 C
om
mo
n t
o A
ll\H
SE
\EF
16
00
PH
SE
R S
tag
e 2
Re
po
rt 2
0-
01
-10
Re
v.2
.do
c
Item
P
HS
ER
Acti
vit
y
PH
SE
R C
om
men
t O
bserv
ati
on
/Reco
mm
en
dati
on
P
rio
rity
B
y
1.6
b
Fla
res
N/A
1.6
c
Nois
e,
sm
ell,
vis
ual im
pact
KO
C s
tandard
s w
ill b
e a
pplie
d –
nois
e f
rom
genera
tor
mitig
ate
d b
y e
nclo
sure
s /
walls
. R
eco
mm
en
dati
on
-1
Revie
w C
ontr
acto
rs s
cope o
f w
ork
to v
erify
their
responsib
ilities f
or
nois
e s
urv
eys b
oth
befo
re a
nd a
fter
constr
uction.
Mediu
m
PM
C
1.6
d
Poin
t sourc
e &
fug
itiv
e e
mis
sio
ns
Genera
tor
exhausts
/ b
att
ery
room
– v
enting
to c
urr
ent
KO
C
sta
ndard
s.
1.6
e
Gre
enhouse g
as a
nd N
Ox e
mis
sio
ns
KO
C e
nvironm
enta
l sta
ndard
s c
over
HV
AC
gases
Reco
mm
en
dati
on
- 2
R
evie
w e
mis
sio
n s
tandard
s t
o b
e a
pplie
d t
o g
enera
tors
.
Mediu
m
PM
C
1.6
f C
apabili
ties f
or
off
site t
reatm
ent
and d
isposal
Exis
ting
dis
posal ro
ute
s w
ill b
e u
sed –
no n
ew
waste
s
req
uirin
g a
ltern
ative d
isposals
is inclu
ded.
2
To
veri
fy t
hat
all
ap
pli
cab
le r
eg
ula
tio
ns,
sta
nd
ard
s,
an
d
rele
van
t K
OC
exp
ecta
tio
ns h
ave b
een
id
en
tifi
ed
.
2.1
R
evie
w t
he P
roje
ct’s l
ist
of
appro
ved s
pecific
ations,
Codes
and S
tandard
s.
Confirm
that
these a
re a
ppro
priate
, ta
kin
g
into
account
curr
ent
industr
y
conventions
and,
where
applic
able
, th
ose
in
exis
tence
on
associa
ted
exis
ting
fa
cili
ties.
All
KO
C s
tandard
s,
specific
ations,
KO
C H
SE
MS
and F
ire
and S
afe
ty R
eg
ula
tions s
hall
be a
pplie
d.
These a
re a
ppro
priate
as t
hey a
re b
ein
g r
evie
wed a
s p
art
of
the F
EE
D d
evelo
pm
ent.
P
roje
ct
specific
ation a
ddenda
genera
ted w
here
req
uired.
2.2
R
evie
w t
he s
trate
gy f
or
assuring
com
plia
nce w
ith t
he K
OC
H
SE
MS
Expecta
tions.
Pro
ject
HS
E P
lan d
evelo
ped b
y P
MC
in a
ccord
ance w
ith
KO
C-G
E-0
48 f
or
FE
ED
sta
ge.
Will
be d
evelo
ped b
y C
ontr
acto
r fo
r E
PC
Phase.
2.3
R
evie
w t
he l
ocal
and n
ational
reg
ula
tory
req
uirem
ents
, and
the p
roje
ct’s
pro
posal fo
r a “
license t
o o
pera
te”
Exis
ting
pla
nt
opera
ting
under
exis
ting
pla
ns.
EIA
will
be a
ppro
ved b
y K
uw
ait E
PA
during
execution o
f E
PC
Phase.
3
To
co
nfi
rm
that
an
ad
eq
uate
H
SE
p
lan
h
as
been
esta
bli
sh
ed
.
P
roje
ct N
um
ber
Docum
ent N
um
ber
Rev
Date
S
heet
E
F/1
600
1600-0
00-0
00-R
PT
-0001
R2
20
th J
an
2010
7 o
f 9
S:\
EF
16
00
\EF
16
00
_C
om
mo
n\D
CC
\EF
16
00
- IT
B P
acka
ge
\Att
1 -
Pro
ject
Sp
ecific
Do
cu
me
nts
\1.
So
uth
Ku
wa
it F
acili
tie
s\1
.1 C
om
mo
n t
o A
ll\H
SE
\EF
16
00
PH
SE
R S
tag
e 2
Re
po
rt 2
0-
01
-10
Re
v.2
.do
c
Item
P
HS
ER
Acti
vit
y
PH
SE
R C
om
men
t O
bserv
ati
on
/Reco
mm
en
dati
on
P
rio
rity
B
y
3.1
R
evie
w
the
Health,
Safe
ty
and
Environm
enta
l pla
n,
and
ensure
that
:
3.1
a
Adeq
uate
exte
rnal, i
nte
rnal, s
pecia
list
and p
eer
revie
ws
have b
een s
chedule
d.
Team
revie
wed T
able
1 o
f H
SE
pla
n.
All
revie
ws e
xcept
the
Constr
ucta
bili
ty r
evie
w h
ave b
een c
om
ple
ted a
nd m
inute
s
pro
duced.
Reco
mm
en
dati
on
– 3
A
Constr
ucta
bili
ty r
evie
w s
hall
be h
eld
and r
ecord
ed b
efo
re
ITT
is issued.
To b
e h
eld
on 2
1/0
1/2
010.
Mediu
m
PM
C
3.1
b
A p
lan h
as b
een d
evelo
ped f
or
the c
onduct
of
PH
SE
Rs
Desig
n P
hase –
in H
SE
Pla
n
EP
C P
hase a
s p
er
LS
TK
Contr
act
sta
ndard
.
3.1
c
The
pro
gra
mm
e
and
inte
nded
org
anis
ation
for
the
pro
cure
ment,
execution
and
revie
w
of
HS
E
stu
die
s,
inclu
din
g H
ealth A
ssessm
ent,
and E
IA e
tc.
are
in p
lace.
FE
ED
phase is inclu
ded in t
he P
MC
PM
P.
Desig
n P
hase s
hall
be d
evelo
ped b
y E
PC
Contr
acto
r as
part
of
their s
cope a
nd s
chedulin
g o
f w
ork
s.
3.1
d
Develo
p t
he P
roje
ct
HS
E p
lan
at
the C
PP
sta
ge a
nd
obta
in H
SE
Gro
up e
ndors
em
ent
PM
C H
SE
pla
ns h
ave b
een issued.
(To b
e issued t
o H
SE
S
EK
, H
SE
Export
, and H
SE
Gas o
pera
tions).
3.1
e
The s
tudie
s a
re s
chedule
d t
o b
e c
om
ple
ted in g
ood t
ime
to
ensure
th
at
actions
can
be
incorp
ora
ted
into
th
e
desig
n a
nd t
hat
resourc
es a
re a
vaila
ble
in o
rder
to c
arr
y
out
the w
ork
.
All
except
one s
tudy h
ave b
een c
om
ple
ted d
uring
FE
ED
sta
ge.
See 3
.1a
3.1
f C
ontr
acto
r sele
ction a
nd p
rocure
ment
str
ate
gy a
ligned
with K
OC
HS
EM
S e
xpecta
tions
All
Contr
acto
rs a
nd V
endors
are
fro
m K
OC
Appro
ved lis
ts.
3.2
R
evie
w t
he inte
ntions f
or
the t
rackin
g o
f actions a
risin
g f
rom
H
SE
stu
die
s.
FE
ED
has b
een c
overe
d b
y r
evie
w o
f actions f
rom
min
ute
s.
Reco
mm
en
dati
on
– 4
V
erify
that
the r
eq
uirem
ents
for
this
are
inclu
ded in E
PC
C
ontr
acto
rs H
SE
Scope o
f W
ork
.
Mediu
m
PM
C
3.3
R
evie
w t
he i
nte
nded a
rrang
em
ents
for
the r
esourc
ing
and
train
ing
of
the w
ork
forc
e f
or
the d
evelo
pm
ent.
LS
TK
Contr
act
defines r
esponsib
ility
of
EP
C C
ontr
acto
r to
supply
tra
inin
g.
4
To
co
nfi
rm
that
an
ad
eq
uate
H
SE
ri
sk
man
ag
em
en
t
P
roje
ct N
um
ber
Docum
ent N
um
ber
Rev
Date
S
heet
E
F/1
600
1600-0
00-0
00-R
PT
-0001
R2
20
th J
an
2010
8 o
f 9
S:\
EF
16
00
\EF
16
00
_C
om
mo
n\D
CC
\EF
16
00
- IT
B P
acka
ge
\Att
1 -
Pro
ject
Sp
ecific
Do
cu
me
nts
\1.
So
uth
Ku
wa
it F
acili
tie
s\1
.1 C
om
mo
n t
o A
ll\H
SE
\EF
16
00
PH
SE
R S
tag
e 2
Re
po
rt 2
0-
01
-10
Re
v.2
.do
c
Item
P
HS
ER
Acti
vit
y
PH
SE
R C
om
men
t O
bserv
ati
on
/Reco
mm
en
dati
on
P
rio
rity
B
y
str
ate
gy h
as b
een
esta
bli
sh
ed
.
4.1
R
evie
w th
e pote
ntial
for
sig
nific
ant
HS
E in
cid
ents
. It
is
re
asonable
to e
xpect
initia
tion o
f :-
4.1
a
A C
oncept
Safe
ty E
valu
ation (
CS
E)
if s
ignific
ant
hazard
pote
ntial is
identified.
No s
ignific
ant
hazard
s identified d
uring
HA
ZID
4.1
b
An
Environm
enta
l Im
pact
Assessm
ent
(EIA
) if
sig
nific
ant
environm
enta
l im
pact
pote
ntial is
identified.
(In
both
in
sta
nces
the
pote
ntial
will
g
enera
lly
be
reg
ard
ed a
s “
sig
nific
ant”
if
lasting
im
pact
beyond t
he
plo
t boundary
is p
ossib
le.
The r
evie
w s
hould
inclu
de
consid
era
tion o
f th
e p
ote
ntial fo
r a m
ate
rials
receip
t and
dis
patc
h incid
ent.
)
Pre
limin
ary
EIA
pre
pare
d f
or
appro
val.
4.2
R
evie
w
the
pro
posed
crite
ria
for
tole
rable
risk
and
the
means b
y w
hic
h t
he p
roje
ct
inte
nds t
o e
valu
ate
the d
esig
n
ag
ain
st
these
crite
ria
and
dem
onstr
ate
th
at
risk
will
be
min
imis
ed (
ALA
RP
).
Revie
w if
a Q
RA
will
be n
eeded.
Does
pro
ject
sig
nific
antly c
hang
e t
he s
ite r
isk p
rofile
?
QR
A w
ill b
e p
roduced d
uring
EP
C p
hase.
Tole
rable
ris
k s
hall
be in a
ccord
ance w
ith K
OC
Sta
ndard
s.
Pro
ject’s inte
ntion is t
o s
ignific
antly r
educe s
ite r
isk p
rofile
by s
epara
ting
opera
tions p
ers
onnel fr
om
the f
acili
ties a
s
much a
s is p
racticable
.
4.3
R
evie
w t
he d
esig
n p
rincip
les f
or
safe
ty a
nd e
nvironm
enta
l risk c
ontr
ol and m
itig
ation f
eatu
res,
inclu
din
g :
-
4.3
a
Pro
cess c
onta
inm
ent
N/A
– n
o p
roje
ct
work
on p
rocess f
acili
ties.
4.3
b
Unit s
epara
tion /
layout
KO
C-L
-028 u
sed f
or
layout
of
facili
ties.
4.3
c
Pro
tective syste
ms (i.e
. re
lief
syste
ms,
fire
pro
tection,
etc
.)
F&
G a
nd f
ire f
ighting
eq
uip
ment
in a
ccord
ance w
ith K
OC
S
tandard
s is b
ein
g inclu
ded in b
uild
ing
s.
4.3
d
Isola
tion p
hilo
sophy
N/A
– n
o p
roje
ct
work
on p
rocess f
acili
ties.
4.3
e
Pro
tection o
f pers
onnel
See 4
.3b
4.3
f E
merg
ency
serv
ice
pro
vis
ions/e
merg
ency
response
pla
n
Build
ing
s d
esig
n t
o p
rovid
e a
ccess /
eg
ress f
or
em
erg
ency
serv
ices.
Exis
ting
KO
C e
merg
ency s
erv
ices (
fire
/
am
bula
nce)
will
be u
sed.
P
roje
ct N
um
ber
Docum
ent N
um
ber
Rev
Date
S
heet
E
F/1
600
1600-0
00-0
00-R
PT
-0001
R2
20
th J
an
2010
9 o
f 9
S:\
EF
16
00
\EF
16
00
_C
om
mo
n\D
CC
\EF
16
00
- IT
B P
acka
ge
\Att
1 -
Pro
ject
Sp
ecific
Do
cu
me
nts
\1.
So
uth
Ku
wa
it F
acili
tie
s\1
.1 C
om
mo
n t
o A
ll\H
SE
\EF
16
00
PH
SE
R S
tag
e 2
Re
po
rt 2
0-
01
-10
Re
v.2
.do
c
Item
P
HS
ER
Acti
vit
y
PH
SE
R C
om
men
t O
bserv
ati
on
/Reco
mm
en
dati
on
P
rio
rity
B
y
4.4
R
evie
w H
SE
ris
k m
anag
em
ent
str
ate
gy f
or
outs
ourc
ed
facili
ties
N/A
– n
o o
ut-
sourc
ed f
acili
ties.
Em
erg
ency f
acili
ties a
t M
AA
are
pro
vid
ed b
y K
NP
C.
These
will
need t
o b
e r
evie
wed d
uring
EP
C t
o m
anag
e a
ny
chang
es r
eq
uired.
Reco
mm
en
dati
on
– 5
C
ontr
acto
rs H
SE
pla
n m
ust
be a
ligned t
o K
NP
C’s
re
quirem
ents
for
the w
ork
s p
erf
orm
ed a
t M
AA
.
Low
PM
C
5
To
co
nfi
rm t
hat
a H
AZ
OP
str
ate
gy h
as b
een
esta
bli
sh
ed
5.1
R
evie
w p
roposals
for
ensuring
that
the s
cope o
f th
e H
AZ
OP
stu
dy
inclu
des
all
aspects
of
the develo
pm
ent,
in
clu
din
g
vendor
packag
es,
with
a s
ignific
ant
hazard
pote
ntial
HA
ZO
P is n
ot
rele
vant
as t
he P
roje
ct
does n
ot
involv
e a
pro
cess.
Reco
mm
en
dati
on
– 6
R
evie
w w
ith C
om
pany O
pera
tions T
eam
s (
EK
, S
K,
E&
M,
GM
) th
at
their r
eq
uirem
ents
for
chang
e-o
ver
are
inclu
ded
within
the r
eq
uirem
ents
of
the I
TT
. R
eco
mm
en
dati
on
– 7
C
om
pany n
eed t
o r
evie
w e
xis
ting
site p
rocedure
s /
em
erg
ency p
rocedure
s t
o v
erify
whic
h w
ill b
e c
hang
ed b
y
the n
ew
facili
ties a
nd d
evelo
p p
rog
ram
me t
o u
pdate
them
and t
rain
opera
tors
accord
ing
ly.
Mediu
m
Low
PM
C
OT
S /
E
TS
/
GS
5.2
R
evie
w
the
pro
posed
tim
ing
of
the
HA
ZO
P
stu
dy,
resourc
ing
, and in p
art
icula
r arr
ang
em
ents
for
incorp
ora
ting
findin
g in t
he s
pecific
ations f
or
early-o
rder
item
s.
See a
bove
System Guideword Consequences Safeguards Action No P S R By
External Hazards
(Natural)
Earthquake Building collapse Design to Building Codes -
UBC Zone 1
Lightning Fire / electrical
equipment failure
New building will be
design according to
international standards
Ground
Slide/Subsidence/Foundation
Building collapse Bore hole sampling / silt
Failure trenching will be
undertaken at
all locations to establish
soil conditions.
Flooding
Damage to
equipment within
Raised elevated
Switchrooms
buildings
Climatic extremes Equipment failure
-Construction
issues
KOC-GE-007 used for
design basis;
Working hours in summer
will be restricted in
accordance
with KOC Practice.
Sandstorms Dust / dirt in
Substations
filtration on air inlets;
Positive pressure inside
the substations. Double
door in luck entry.
Review KOC custom
and practice and ensure
intakes minimise sand
ingress.
1 D 3 M PMC -
Architectural
Vermin Gnoring at cables Ensure vermin guards
fitted where access
ground level access is
provided.
2 C 4 M PMC -
Architectural
External Hazards (Man- Sabotage / Terrorist
made)
Adjacent Land Use Refer to OTS IMP team
Road Traffic
Some perimeter roads to
the substations are also
Public Roads
Vehicle barriers have
been provided to protect
substation facilities.
Contaminated land Oil lakes Visual inspection already
undertaken. Sites selected
on elevated ground.
Aircraft No perceived additional
risk than surrounding
areas or currently present.
Effects on Surrounding Population Centres Not applicable -within
security
area
Traffic Movement Cultural or
Social Aspects
Re-routing of
roads at GCs and
BSs in SEK.
Already allowed for within
design. Within existing
facility security area.
Accommodation requirements Labour force Will be as per current
KOC custom and practice;
numbers will be less than
for current
FMP projects so similar
systems will suffice.
Infrastructure Link & site roads
Will use existing
site roads
HAZID REPORT FORM
1 of 6
System Guideword Consequences Safeguards Action No P S R By
Service Mains Water / Power /
Sewerage /
Drainage
Electrical protection and
protection of cables during
construction /
Metal detections/ Hand
excavation
Telecom’s Redirect existing IT
Infrastructure
Review project strategy
and requirements with
3 B 5 M PMC -Control
Engineers
Laydown/spares holding
Identify preliminary
areas and 4 E 1 L
PMC -
Construction
confirm with Asset.
During EPC phase
Drainage
Hazardous
chemical
drainage from
substation battery
room
Collection at neutralisation
pit/ sump prior to removal
by effluent tanker to
company approval
discharge area.
Rain water to evaporation
areas.
Plant Layout Separation generally in
accordance with KOC-L-
027/028.
Provide risk
assessments where
standard can not be
met
5 C 5 H PMC -Projects
and obtain Asset HSE
approval for location. Overhead lines accident will
accour areas
Applicable KOC procedure
will be enforced
Car Parking Facilities Not Part of
design
Site establishment EPC Contractor
responsibility
Check that welfare
facilities 6 C 3 M
PMC -
Contracts
and needs HSE approval including messing
facilities are under KOC procedures adequately covered.
Operational Tie ins Many tie-ins with
multiple
buildings; lengthy
Design to minimise
number of tie-ins.
Plans / Execution
Strategy for design and
execution of Works
7 B 5 M PMC -Projects
handovers / lack
of control
to be agreed by all
concerned
possible
Electrical Hazard.
teams and approved
before issue of ITB.
Simultaneous
operation/construction
Loss of
production.
PMC to hold regular
reviews with Asset during
FEED. EPC Contractor to
liaise during execution
phase as per Contract.
TSA, PTW, RA, etc
HAZID REPORT FORM
2 of 6
System Guideword Consequences Safeguards Action No P S R By
Process Hazards Pressure Not applicable -
Civil /
Electrical design
of non
hazardous plant
Inventory Not applicable -
Civil / Electrical
design of non
hazardous plant
Chemical Reaction Not applicable -
Civil / Electrical
design of non
hazardous plant
Toxic Substances Process gas -
H2S/
Contaminated
soil
Up wind of plant; Elevated
sub-stations; No
basements; HVAC from
roof level; gas detection
Integrity Control systems
including ESD /
F&G being
moved and
replaced. Less
production.
Upgrade of safety systems
shall be to latest
standards. Proper
planning, PTW, proper
work control
Corrosion
Not applicable -
Civil /
Electrical design
of non
hazardous plant
Erosion Not applicable -
Civil / Electrical
design of non
hazardous plant
Pressure Testing Not applicable -
Civil / Electrical
design of non
hazardous plant
Hot Surfaces DEG Exhaust Insulation/ lagging of
exhaust
Low temperature Not applicable -
Civil / Electrical
design of non
hazardous plant
Start Up Production loss
during shudown.
Procedures written during
EPC to cover; there will be
no change to the existing
plant operation. Existing
systems shall not be de-
commissioning until new
systems are fully tested
operationally. Gradual
change over. Proper
commesion & testing.
Shutdown No change to
existing systems
Operational stability No change to
existing systems
Process cross connection No change to
existing systems
Fatigue Not applicable
Is process ALARP and BAT No change to
existing systems
Fire and Explosion
Hazards
Stored Flammables Diesel
Generators in
Sub-stations;
Transformer oils
KOC standards shall be
applied, including
standards for fire fighting
in these areas.
HAZID REPORT FORM
3 of 6
System Guideword Consequences Safeguards Action No P S R By
Ignition Sources DEG Fire & gas for DEG Hazardous zones to be
reviewed and updated
as required to reflect
changes to risks.
Action closed.
8 C 3 M PMC -Process
/ Tech Safety
Confinement
Battery rooms for
UPS
Ventilation in accordance
with
current KOC standards
and practice
Wind Process gas
blown over
buildings
Gas detector included in
HVAC .
Separation/segregation
Plant to KOC-L-027/ 028
See
above
Active Fire Protection not requires
Passive Fire Protection
Building codes for
architectural
design
Fire Fighting equipment Electrical /
domestic type
fires
Fire extinguishers to be
provided as per KOC Fire
and Safety regulations
Ensure that fire water
ring mains can protect
or are extended to
protect new building
locations.
9 C 5 H PMC -Process
/ Tech Safety
Fire and Gas detection
Electrical /
domestic type Smoke, heat and rate of
Provide fire risk
assessment 10 B 5 M
PMC -Process
/ Tech
temperature rise detectors
as
for new facilities. Action
closed
Safety
per KOC Standards Blowdown Not applicable
Orientation See wind
Means of Escape Trapped Two means of scape from
eaither end of building
PPE Not applicable
Missiles From process
plant -especially
pig traps
Ensure no existing traps
are point towards new
building locations that are
manned or
contain safety critical
equipment.
Shockwaves
Process plant
explosion
Building located in none
Hazardous area.
Combustion products (toxic and
smoke)
Standard building
materials shall be used;
generally non-flammable
Short Circuit Transformer
short circuit
explosion
Provision of blast wall
containment orientation of
substation to direct any
blast debris away from
plant.
HAZID REPORT FORM
4 of 6
System Guideword Consequences Safeguards Action No P S R By
Construction/ Operation/ Lifts – Dropped objects Will be covered by Maintenance etc Construction method
statements. No lifts over
live plant anticipated.
Manual Handling Switchgear KOC standards shall be
applied.
Access
Switch gear and
control system KOC Standards shall be
marshalling
cabinets
applied
Override/inhibits Not applicable
By pass UPS bypass Proper planning and
procedure to be followed.
Commonality
Control systems
and Contract strategy still to be
Agree Contract strategy
with all 11 B 5 M
PMC -
Contracts swichgear developed and approved. concerned teams.
Working at heights
Construction
issue Fire and Safety Regs
Isolation
Electrical
systems Can be isolated and will be
provided. PTW/ locks tag.
Confined Space
Raised buildings
in design. KOC Fire and Safety
Construction will
involve
Regulations and PTW will
apply.
digging
Online Testing New Control
System
Commissioning
Develop plan and
strategy and seek
concurrence with Asset.
Basis of plan / strategy
12 C 5 H PMC -Projects
during execution.
Hot working Generally in safe
areas
KOC Fire and Safety
Regulations and PTW will
apply.
Assurance of mobile equipment KOC Fire and Safety
Regulations, PTW and
VEP will apply.
Demolition Existing Control
Buildings
BY Hand and is covered
by KOC Procedure
Ensure that KOC
Procedures for
13 B 4 M PMC -Projects
what information is
required from EPC
Contractor to comply with them
Utilities Fire water Extension of
main discussed
above
Provision of fire hydrants.
Fire water tank located
outside plant area.
Electrical Power
Drains (process/ surface/
sewerage) See above
Waste (Solid/ Liquid)
New buildings will
be as per Demolition plans and
Ensure MSDS's are
available 14 D 4 H KOC -OTS
existing. procedures referenced
above
for all materials to be
removed.
Demolition of
existing buildings
will be used. Identify materials as
part of
FEED design Heating Medium Not applicable
Lighting New Roads KOC standards will be
applied
Inert Gas
HAZID REPORT FORM
5 of 6
System Guideword Consequences Safeguards Action No P S R By
Project Design Safety
control
Shutdown Hierarchy Non-process
related
modifications -no
change
Register of safety devices Moving /
changing
Ensure that all relevant
KOC HSEMS
procedures with respect
15 C 5 H PMC -Projects
adhered to
Management of change
procedure
Register of
Safety Critical
equipment
See above
Are design reviews planned IDC's within design team
Issue plan for overall
design 16 B 4 M PMC -Projects
reviews. Discipline Interface IDC's within design team
Personnel/Suppliers/ Selection of appropriate
personnel
Unqualified
personnel/
subcontractors
Properly qualified, trained,
inducted personnel.
Subcontractors
Training A plan will be produced by
the EPC Contractor
KOC Operations to
provide details on
numbers to be
17 C 4 M KOC -OTS
trained and constraints
on
availability. Identify who
is responsible for
ensure that all
necessary personnel
are trained and that the
training has been
delivered. To include in
the ITB that contractor
has to provide training
for new equepment
installed.
Contingencies Medical facilities As per existing KOC
Procedures
Fire fighting Access allowed for within
design
Security
Emergency services
All covered by existing
KOC
Procedures and systems.
Site Spill / Clean up
HSEMS and Fire and
Safety
Regulations apply
Suppliers/Subcontractors KOC Approved
As per Contract
documents
Suitability
Contract options / strategy
still
being developed. Pre
approved subcontractors.
Historic Information Records being retrieved
where available. Site
surveys being used to
substantiate.
HAZID REPORT FORM
6 of 6
1
KUWAIT OIL COMPANYKUWAIT OIL COMPANYKUWAIT OIL COMPANYKUWAIT OIL COMPANY
EF EF EF EF –––– 1600160016001600 CONTROL ROOM ENHANCONTROL ROOM ENHANCONTROL ROOM ENHANCONTROL ROOM ENHANCEMENTSCEMENTSCEMENTSCEMENTS
MINUTES OF MEETINGMINUTES OF MEETINGMINUTES OF MEETINGMINUTES OF MEETING Meeting Number: EF-1600-MOM-10-005 Meeting Type: HAZID Workshop
Date: 19th January 2010 Contract: EF 1600
Location: AMEC Design office in Wynyard Parck, UK Recorded By: Meshari Al-Bader
Time: 15:00 hrs to 17:00 hrs
ATTENDEES: KOC Abdul Hadi AlZaubi
Nasser Alattar
Ali Shams
Rashid Aldosari
Senior Engineer/ MP VIII
Electrical Eng. / Main. SK
Electrical Eng. / OTS SEK
Inst. Eng./ Main. SK
DISTRIBUTION: KOC
File: EF/1600 Paul Unsworth – Projects Construction Manager (PMC) Ross Robb – HSEQ Manager (PMC) John Lambert – Engineering Manager Ross Ferguson – Project Engineer 1 All Attendees Document Control Company Team
PMC
Jim Martin
Meshari Al-Bader
Les Smalls
David Sullivan
Rechard Punter
George Renwick
Project Engineer
Associat Project Engineer
Lead Electrical Engineer
Lead Instrument Engineer
Lead construction Engineer
Civil Engineer
ATTACHMENT:
HAZID Report Form
SUBJECT: HAZID STUDY ON EF/1600- ELEVATED SUBSTATIONS IN SEK
NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION BY BY DATE
1.0 The attendees re-visited the HAZID review report MOM-EF1600-0001
completed on 23rd
July 2007 which used a checklist approach to identiy
Hazards accociated with the EF 1600 Works and their implementation.
Record of minute as per attached sheet.
2.0 The identified actions have been subsequently risk ranked in accordance with
methodology included within KOC. SA.018.
3.0 All actions shall be reviewed during the development of the FEED. Those
that have been ranked as HIGH shall be actioned immediately and responses
obtained as part of the basis for the development of the FEED to reduce the
risk.
Those actions ranked as MEDIUM and LOW shall be reviewed by the project
team and dates set for the responses so that the current Contract schedule is
not jeopardized.
PMC
4.0 PMC Technical Safety will review closure of actions as part of PHSER 2
review. PMC
End of Minutes
2
Attacments: HAZID Record Forms (6off Sheets)