tratamiento endodóntico de dos molares mandibulares con taurodontismo

Upload: juan-diego-zabaleta-orozco

Post on 21-Feb-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Tratamiento Endodntico de Dos Molares Mandibulares Con Taurodontismo.

    1/6

    ENDO (Lond Engl) 2008;2(3):199203

    CASE REPORT

    Pyramidal teeth are thought to be a minor form of taurodontism, which is a morpho-anatomical

    change in the shape of a tooth, usually occurring in multirooted teeth as a result of failure of theinfolding of the epithelial root sheet of Hertwig. The characteristic features of these teeth are an

    enlarged body and pulp chamber, as well as apical displacement of the pulpal floor. Endodontic

    treatment of a taurodont tooth is challenging, because it requires special care in handling, and in the

    identification of the number of root canals and morphology of the tooth. In this case report, the

    endodontic treatment of a mandibular first and second molar with pyramidal root canal morphology

    is presented.

    Sebastian Brklein

    Endodontic treatment of two pyramidal (taurodont)mandibular molars: a case report

    dental malformation, endodontic treatment, root canal morphology, taurodontismKey words Sebastian BrkleiPrivate Practice, Zahnk

    Bochum, Bergstrasse 2

    D-44791 Bochum, Ger

    Tel: +49 234 5839228

    Email: sbuerklein@gmx

    Introduction

    The term taurodontism was introduced in 1913 by Sir

    Arthur King1. He proposed that taurodont molars are

    characterised by the distinct extension of the pulp

    chamber below the level of the alveolar crest and the

    cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and apical displace-

    ment of the bi- or trifurcation of the roots. Addition-

    ally, taurodontism refers to a tooth-form character-

    ised by an external block configuration, which means

    an elongated body that tends to enlarge at the ex-

    pense of the root and give it a rectangular shape.Teeth with pulp chambers that are relatively small

    and have constriction of the pulp chamber at approxi-

    mately the level of the CEJ are called cynodonts2.

    The aetiology of taurodontism is unclear, but is

    attributed to the failure of invagination of the epi-

    thelial root sheath sufficiently early to form the cyno-

    dont. One hypothesis is that taurodontism might be

    the result of a disrupted developmental haemostasis3.

    An autosomal transmission of the trait has also been

    observed4. Various manifestations of taurodontism

    are described: this malformation can occur alone,

    limited to one or more teeth or it can be associated

    with various syndromes including Downs syndrome

    or Klinefelters syndrome5,6. Taurodontism may be

    unilateral or bilateral and affects permanent teeth

    more frequently than primary teeth. It is commonly

    observed among certain ethnic groups such as

    natives of Alaska, Australia and Central America7.

    Taurodontism may be classified as mild, moderate

    and severe (hypo-, meso- and hypertaurodontism,

    respectively)8 based on the degree of apical displace-

    ment of the pulp chamber floor2. The prevalence oftaurodontism found by radiographic dental exami-

    nation in patients has been shown as ranging from

    5.69 to 8%10, up to 48% (18.8% of teeth affected)11,

    or 60%12, whereas the prevalence of pyramidal molars

    was 4.6% (1.6% of teeth) in specially selected ethnic

    groups11. In western European subjects, the prevalence

    is estimated to be about 10%13,14. Although tauro-

    dontism does not involve molar teeth exclusively15 it is

    found to be significantly more prevalent in second

    maxillary molars16.

  • 7/24/2019 Tratamiento Endodntico de Dos Molares Mandibulares Con Taurodontismo.

    2/6

    ENDO (Lond Engl) 2008;2(3):199203

    200 Brklein Treatment of two pyramidal (taurodont) mandibular molars

    Generally, taurodontism and pyramidal teeth are

    a rare dental anomaly, and endodontic treatment is

    challenging because it requires special care in

    handling and identifying the number of root canals17.

    Case report

    Diagnosis

    A 43-year-old woman was referred to the authors

    department for the treatment of the right first mandi-

    bular molar. Dental history revealed that she had been

    suffering from pain for 6 days prior to her visit to the

    clinic and that the pain was spontaneous and

    aggravated at night. This was disturbing her sleep and

    meant she was taking analgesics. Tooth 46 had beenendodontically pretreated 1 week previously and an

    intracanal dressing with Ledermix-paste (Riemser,

    Greifswald, Germany) was placed. This medicament

    consisted of corticosteroids and tetracycline. The cor-

    ticosteroid component has a calming and anti-inflam-

    matory effect, whereas the antimicrobial component

    should prevent the proliferation of bacteria.

    Intraoral examination revealed that the coronal

    access cavity was sealed with a temporary filling. At

    tooth 47 a deep carious lesion was found on the

    mesio-occlusal surface. Both teeth were subjected to

    routine clinical tests and, although tooth 46 showed

    the typical symptoms for an endodontically pre-

    treated tooth with Ledermix-paste (the sensitivity test

    was positive because of the remaining vital tissue, and

    the percussion test was negative), a provisional diag-

    nosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis was made

    concerning tooth 47 (the sensitivity test was positive

    and the percussion test was positive). The periodontal

    probing depths showed no elevated levels.

    Radiographic observations included an area ofrarefaction located between the roots of both teeth,

    the carious lesion located at the mesial aspect of tooth

    47, a kind of hypercementosis associated with the

    root of tooth 46 and a tendency of root canal obliter-

    ation (Fig 1). Moreover, the radiograph revealed an

    abnormal pyramidal root anatomy for both teeth.

    Endodontic treatment

    Anaesthesia was achieved by means of inferior

    alveolar nerve block with 1.8ml of 4% articaine

    with 1:100.000 adrenaline. Access to the pulp

    chamber of tooth 47 was gained under rubber dam

    isolation. A huge pulp chamber was encountered

    with one central root canal. The pulp tissue was

    extirpated and the working length was determinedelectronically using the Root ZX device (Morita,

    Tokyo, Japan). Chemo-mechanical preparation of

    the root canal system was achieved by alternating

    circumferential filing with manual stainless steel K-

    and Hedstrm files at full working length. Copious

    irrigation with 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)

    was performed during the instrumentation process.

    Finally, after instrumentation was completed, a

    passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal was

    performed with NaOCl to ensure optimal dissolu-

    tion of remaining pulp tissue. Using an operatingmicroscope, no accessory apical canals were

    detected and a wide-open apical foramen was

    visible. A mechanical preparation up to ISO size 150

    was necessary, because the first instrument that had

    bound in the apical region was already a size 110.

    At the same appointment, the pretreated tooth 46

    was subjected to the same procedure after the

    coronal access was enlarged and the overhanging

    areas of the pulp chamber roof were removed. It

    was detected that the clinician had nearly caused

    perforation of the mesial (probably due to the ex-

    ploration of the expected mesial canals during the

    previous appointment) but the absence of further

    root canals was proved using the operating micro-

    scope. The apical region was extremely calcified and

    a wide foramen could not be detected. Root canal

    instrumentation up to size 110 was thoroughly per-

    formed using circumferential filing with stainless

    steel K-files alternating with Hedstrm files, and

    repeated irrigation with NaOCl was performed after

    electronic determination of the working length. Theroot canals of both teeth were dried and dressed

    with an aqueous solution of calcium hydroxide

    (Ca(OH)2). Finally, the access cavities were sealed

    with zinc oxide-eugenol cement.

    The patient was recalled after 2 weeks. The

    intracanal dressing was removed with stainless steel

    hand instruments, and passive ultrasonic irrigation

    was performed to optimise the removal of the intra-

    canal dressing. After thorough irrigation with

    NaOCl and EDTA for smear layer removal, the

  • 7/24/2019 Tratamiento Endodntico de Dos Molares Mandibulares Con Taurodontismo.

    3/6

    ENDO (Lond Engl) 2008;2(3):199203

    Brklein Treatment of two pyramidal (taurodont) mandibular molars

    canals were dried using paper points. Gutta-percha

    master cones were then fitted at working lengths

    with a slight tug-back. Obturation was performed

    using cold lateral condensation with a size 25

    spreader and size 20 collateral points using AH Plus

    (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) as a sealer. After

    removing the surplus filling material and thorough

    cleaning of the access cavities, 37% phosphoric

    acid was syringed into both access cavities, left for

    15s, rinsed off and a bonding agent was applied.

    Finally, both access cavities were sealed with a resin

    composite restoration. The post-operative radio-

    graph shows homogeneous root canal fillings with

    an adequate length (Fig 2).

    Post endodontic treatment

    The patient was reviewed 3 months later and was

    free of symptoms. A new crown for tooth 46 was

    made. The 1-year follow-up radiograph revealed that

    healing had occurred (Fig 3). The radiograph that

    was subsequently made showed that all molars were

    characterised by the same root morphology (Fig 4).

    Discussion

    Taurodontism can occur in various forms, but depend-

    ing on the severity of this malformation, a distinction in

    meso-, hypo-, hypertaurodontism or pyramidal teeth

    Fig 1 Pretreatment radiograph of teeth46 and 47.

    Fig 2 Post-treatment radiographshowing obturation of teeth 46 and 47.

    Fig 3 1-year follow-up radiographshowing that healing has occurred.

    Fig 4 Radiographshowing multipletaurodont teeth. Nthat all molars dispthis anomaly.

  • 7/24/2019 Tratamiento Endodntico de Dos Molares Mandibulares Con Taurodontismo.

    4/6

    ENDO (Lond Engl) 2008;2(3):199203

    202 Brklein Treatment of two pyramidal (taurodont) mandibular molars

    has been suggested. The position of the pulpal floor in

    relation to the CEJ is the deciding factor8. The

    prevalence of taurodont teeth varies within different

    populations, and the aetiology is not clear. Root mor-

    phology is primarily determined genetically, but may

    also be environmentally modified18

    . The failure ofsufficiently early invagination of the epithelial root

    sheath to form the cynodont, a disrupted develop-

    mental haemostasis3 and an autosomal transmission of

    the trait are aetiological factors of taurodont teeth that

    have been observed4. Teeth most frequently affected

    are molars, although premolars and incisors have also

    been diagnosed as taurodonts in a radiographic study19.

    The incidence of taurodontism is variable,

    depending on the different series and groups studied.

    In general, molars and premolars in both the primary

    and permanent dentitions are affected15,20. Theoccurrence of taurodontism associated with develop-

    mental disorders such as amelogenesis and dentino-

    genesis imperfecta21, or hypodontia22,23 has been

    documented. In patients with syndromes such as

    Downs syndrome24, Klinefelters syndrome20,25,

    ectodermal dysplasia syndrome26, Mohr-syndrome27,

    tricho-dento-osseous syndrome28 or in patients with

    cleft lip and palate29, taurodont teeth are more pre-

    valent than in healthy subjects.

    In this particular case, the patient had no sys-

    temic disturbances, malformations or syndromes

    and, therefore, both teeth were considered to be

    non-syndromic taurodont teeth. Both teeth were

    classified as pyramidal teeth. An inheritable aeti-

    ology could not be found, as the families of the

    patients were not available for examination.

    Endodontic treatment in taurodont teeth has

    been described as complex and difficult, because

    these teeth show wide variations in the size and

    shape of the pulp chamber with varying degrees of

    obliteration and canal configuration31. This morph-ology could complicate the location of the canal

    orifices, which consequently causes difficulties in

    subsequent instrumentation and obturation32.

    The exploration of the canal configuration was

    done using an operating microscope because of the

    width of the pulp chamber. Some authors propose the

    use of micro-computerised tomography (micro-CT) to

    examine the morphology of difficult teeth. With this

    technique, three-dimensional information about the

    examined object is available for the planning of

    endodontic and surgical treatment. Some details may

    become visible that were not detectable using con-

    ventional examination methods33,34,35.

    The radiation exposure depends on the CT and

    is much higher than with conventional intraoral

    radiographs36,37

    . The indication for the diagnosticmethod should be evaluated carefully, and the

    ALARA-principle (as low as reasonably achievable)

    considered for the use of radiation.

    Mechanical debridement and shaping of the root

    canals was achieved with circumferential filing using

    stainless steel hand K-files alternating with stainless

    steel hand Hedstrm-files, because the pulp chamber

    was huge. Preparing oval or large straight root canals

    by this technique leads to satisfying results and is

    superior to rotary instrumentation alone38,39. An even

    preparation of all canal walls during the root canalinstrumentation is possible using this circumferential

    filing technique. The root canal of tooth 47 was ob-

    turated by lateral condensation, as a wide apical fora-

    men was present. This technique allows a good api-

    cal control by trial fitting the master cone, and the

    risk of overextension of gutta-percha or sealer is

    minimised. However, thermoplastic techniques are

    not well controlled and can lead to apical extrusion

    into the periapical tissue40,41. This could cause post-

    operative complaints as well lead to a failure of the

    root canal treatment, or in the worst case, to an

    irreversible nerve injury if material is extruded into

    the nerve canal. Alternatively, an apical plug with

    mineral trioxide aggregate or apexification proce-

    dures using repeated Ca(OH)2 dressings would have

    been possible, but the chosen therapy was easy to

    handle and safe.

    Summary

    Taurodontism including all its varieties (meso-, hypo-,hypertaurodontism and pyramidal teeth)8 is a rare

    dental malformation, in which root canal treatment

    is still a challenge because of multiple and complex

    forms of canal configurations. In each case,

    radiographic examination is essential before

    initiating root canal treatment, so as to become

    aware of the particular root canal configuration. An

    operating microscope may be helpful for the

    exploration of further and accessory canals or a wide

    apical foramen. Chemo-mechanical preparation

  • 7/24/2019 Tratamiento Endodntico de Dos Molares Mandibulares Con Taurodontismo.

    5/6

    ENDO (Lond Engl) 2008;2(3):199203

    Brklein Treatment of two pyramidal (taurodont) mandibular molars

    with copious irrigation and circumferential filing is

    necessary for successful endodontic treatment

    including the obturation technique, which allows

    good apical control, because wide foramina are

    among the characteristics of taurodont teeth.

    References

    1. Keith A. Problems relating to the teeth of the earlier form ofprehistoric man. R Soc Med Sect Odont Proc 1913; 6:103-124.

    2. Ronald WK, Yada C, Linda R. Localized deficient rootdevelopment associated with taurodontism a case report.Pediatr Dent 1999;21:213-215.

    3. Witkop CJ, Keenan KM, Cervienka J, Jaspers MT. Tauro-dontism: an anomaly of teeth reflecting disruptive devel-opmental homeostasis. Am J Dent Genet 1988;4:85-97.

    4. Mangron JJ. Two cases of taurodontism in modern humanjaws. Br Dent J 1962;113:309-312.

    5. Genc A, Namdar F, Goker K, Atasu M. Taurodontism in

    association with supernumerary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent1999;23:151-153.6. Gedik R, Cimem M. Multiple taurodontism, Report of a

    case. J Dent Child 2000;67:216-217.7. Goz PW, White SC. Oral Radiology (Principle and inter-

    pretation), 3rd edition. St. Louis, Missouri: C.V. MosbyYear Book Inc; 1994.

    8. Shaw JCM. Taurodont teeth in South African races. J Anat1928;62:476-499.

    9. Shifman A, Chanannel I. Prevalence of taurodontism found inradiographic dental examination of 1200 young adult Israelipatients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:200-203.

    10. Darwazeh AM, Hamasha AA, Pillai K. Prevalence of tauro-dontism in Jordanian dental patients. DentomaxillofacRadiol 1998;27:163-165.

    11. Sarr M, Toure B, Kane AW, Fall F, Wone MM. Taurodon-tism and the pyramidal tooth at the level of the molar.Prevalence in the Senegalese population 15 to 19 years ofage. Odontostomatol Trop 2000;23:31-34.

    12. Barker BCW. Taurodontism: the incidence and possible sig-nificance of the trait. Aust Dent J 1976;21:272-276.

    13. Schalk-van der Weide Y, Steen WH, Bosman F. Taurodon-tism and length of teeth in patients with oligodontia. J OralRehabil 1993;20:401-412.

    14. Ruprecht A, Batniji S, El-Neweihi E. The incidence of tauro-dontism in dental patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1987;63:743-7.

    15. Madeira MC, Leite HF, Niccoli Filho WD, Simes S. Preva-lence of taurodontism in premolars. Oral Surg Oral MedOral Pathol 1986;61:158-162.

    16. Toure B, Kane AW, Sarr M, Wone MM, Fall F. Prevalenceof taurodontism at the level of the molar in the black Sene-galese population 15 to 19 years of age. OdontostomatolTrop 2000;23:36-39.

    17. Tsesis I, Shifman A, Kaufman A Y. Taurodontism: an endo-dontic challenge. Report of a case. J Endod 2003;29:353-355.

    18. Ackerman JL, Ackerman AL, Ackerman AB. Taurodont,pyramidal and fused roots associated with other anomaliesin a kindred. Am J Phys Anthropol 1973;38:681-694.

    19. Tiku A, Damle SG, Nadkarni UM. Kalaskar RR. Hypertauro-dontism in molars and premolars: Management of two rarecases. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent 2003;21:131-134.

    20. Komatz Y, Tomoyoshi T, Yoshida O, Fujimoto A, YoshitakeK. Taurodontism and Klinefelter's syndrome. Med Genet1978;15:452-454.

    21. Elzay RP, Chamberlain DH. Differential diagnosis ofenlarged dental pulp chambers: a case report of amelo-genesis imperfecta with taurodontism. J Dent Child1986;53:388-390.

    22. Seow WK, Lai PY. Association of taurodontism with hypo-dontia: a controlled study. Pediatr Dent 1989;11:214-219.

    23. Sert S, Bayrl G. Taurodontism in six molars: a case report. JEndod 2004 30:601-602.

    24. Bell J, Civil CR, Townsend GC, Brown RH. The prevalenceof taurodontism in Downs syndrome. J Ment Defic Res1989;33:467-476.

    25. Cichon JC, Pack RS. Taurodontism: review of literature andreport of a case. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:453-455.

    26. Stenvik A, Zachrisson BU, Svatun B. Taurodontism andconcomitant hypodontia in siblings. Oral Surg Oral MedOral Pathol 1972;33:841-844.

    27. Goldstein E, Medina JL. Mohr syndrome or oral-facial-digitalII: report of two cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:377-382.

    28. Levin LS. Dental and oral abnormalities in selected ecto-

    dermal dysplasia syndromes. Birth Defects 1988;24:205-227.29. Laatikainen T, Ranta R. Taurodontism in twins with cleft lip

    and/or palate. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:82-86.30. Subramaniarn EMG, Muthu MS, Sivakumar N. Non-

    syndromic taurodontism. Pak Oral Dent JR 2004;24:139-144.

    31. Hayashi Y. Endodontic treatment in taurodontism. J Endod1994;20:357-358.

    32. Durr DP, Campos CA, Ayers CS. Clinical significance oftaurodontism. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:378-381.

    33. Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging inendodontics: a review. J Endod 2007;33:1-6.

    34. Tsurumachi T, Honda K. A new cone beam computerizedtomography system for use in endodontic surgery. Int

    Endod J 2007;40:224-232.35. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen K, Grndahl H. Limited

    cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosisof periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral PatholOral Radiol Endod 2007;103:114-119.

    36. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S,Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beamcomputed tomography machine for dental use with amultidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral MedOral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:371-377.

    37. Huumonen S, Kvist T, Grndahl K, Molander A. Diagnosticvalue of computed tomography in re-treatment of rootfillings in maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2006;39:827-833.

    38. Weiger R, ElAyouti A, Lst C. Efficiency of hand and rotaryinstruments in shaping oval root canals. J Endod

    2002;28:580-583.39. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. The capability of

    two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the innerlayer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 2003;36:218-224.

    40. Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X. Outcome of root canal obtur-ation by warm gutta-percha versus cold lateral conden-sation: a meta-analysis. J Endod 2007;33:106-109.

    41. van Zyl SP, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Effect of customization ofmaster gutta-percha cone on apical control of root fillingusing different techniques: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J2005;38:658-666.

  • 7/24/2019 Tratamiento Endodntico de Dos Molares Mandibulares Con Taurodontismo.

    6/6