parcial control
DESCRIPTION
fgtudeytTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1)Metodo 2 puntos
Alfaro: Y=5.999
>> Aa=-0.91;>> Ba=0.91;>> Ca=1.262;>> Da=-0.262;>> t25=1.652;>> t75=7.365;
>> Thaoa=Aa*t25+Ba*t75
Thaoa =
5.1988
>> tm=Ca*t25+Da*t75
tm =
0.1552
>> Kp=5.999/1
Kp =
5.9990
>> NUMa=[5.999]
NUMa =
5.9990
>> DENa=[Thaoa 1]
DENa =
5.1988 1.0000>> Gsa=tf(NUMa,DENa) Transfer function: 5.999-----------5.199 s + 1 >> Gsa.iodelay=3.445 Transfer function: 5.999exp(-3.44*s) * ----------- 5.199 s + 1 >> step(Gsa)
![Page 2: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Ho et al: Y(t)=5.999
>> Ah=-0.67;>> Bh=0.67;>> Ch=1.3;>> Dh=-0.29;>> t35=2.396;>> t85=10.015;>> Thaoh=Ah*t35+Bh*t85
Thaoh =
5.1047
>> tmh=Ch*t35+Dh*t85
tmh =
0.2104
>> Kp=5.999/1
Kp =
5.9990
>> NUMh=[5.999];>> DENh=[Thaoh 1];>> Gsh=tf(NUMh,DENh) Transfer function: 5.999
![Page 3: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
-----------5.105 s + 1 >> Gsh.iodelay=3.445 Transfer function: 5.999exp(-3.44*s) * ----------- 5.105 s + 1 >> step(Gsh)
![Page 4: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2) Metodo de Stark
>> t15=1.002;>> t45=3.265;>> t75=7.365;>> X=(t45-t15)/(t75-t15)
X =
0.3556
Zita =
-4.2439
Zita Dio negativo, por lo tanto se le pone valor absoluto
>> Zita=-1*Zita
Zita =
4.2439
>> F2=2.6*Zita-0.6
F2 =
10.4341
>> Wn=F2/(t75-t15)
Wn =
1.6398
>> F3=0.922*(1.66)^Zita
F3 =
7.9221
>> tmSt=t45-(F3/Wn)
tmSt =
-1.5661
>> ThaoSt1=(Zita+sqrt(Zita^2-1))/Wn
![Page 5: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ThaoSt1 =
5.1032
>> ThaoSt2=(Zita-sqrt(Zita^2-1))/Wn
ThaoSt2 =
0.0729
>> ThaoSt1*ThaoSt2
ans =
0.3719
>> ThaoSt1+ThaoSt2
ans =
5.1761
>> NUMSt=[5.999]
NUMSt =
5.9990
>> DENSt=[0.3719 5.1761 1]
DENSt =
0.3719 5.1761 1.0000
>> GsSt=tf(NUMSt,DENSt) Transfer function: 5.999------------------------0.3719 s^2 + 5.176 s + 1 >> GsSt.iodelay=3.445 Transfer function: 5.999exp(-3.44*s) * ------------------------ 0.3719 s^2 + 5.176 s + 1
![Page 6: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
>> step(GsSt)
COMPARACION METODOS MANUALES
![Page 7: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3) ident:
![Page 8: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
COMPARACION Y CONCLUSIONES
![Page 11: Parcial control](https://reader036.vdocuments.co/reader036/viewer/2022071705/563db9b3550346aa9a9f1a8b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Los métodos usados son muy parecidos, todos tienen un porcentaje de error, se podría decir que por 2 o 3 puntos se puede llegara una buena identificación del sistema.
Los métodos que mas se acercaron fueron Stark y Alfaro, siendo que Ho et al se sobrepaso de la curva de comportamiento del sistema.
La herramienta de ident es muy buena, pero tiene un error grande en el tiempo de retardo, es muy semejante a la original del sistema