fca intern presentation
TRANSCRIPT
July 29, 2015
Kendall MooreVehicle Integration & ValidationDurability & Development OperationsGraduating May 2016Mechanical Engineering
Kendall Moore Hometown: Newport News, Virginia
Rising 5th year, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Degree: Mechanical Engineering, minors in Math & Physics
RA & Extracurricular Involvement (social justice, cultural, leadership/honor)
Interests: outdoor activities, live music, Game of Thrones Professional Experience
07/29/2015 2
Opportunities
CPG Ride and Drive
FCA Intern Social Events Walter P. Chrysler Museum
Mack Engine Plant Tour Cultural immersion Day
Road Test Simulation Lab Mechanical Life Testing Lab
Data Acquisition at Chelsea Proving Grounds
07/29/2015 3
407/29/2015
Background
Resistance Spot Welds Primary connection for joining vehicle body structures ~80% body structure durability issues are at resistance spot welds
Typical Loading Conditions and Failure Modes of Spot Welds Lap Shear Coach Peel
507/29/2015
Project Description
Investigate sensitivity of spot weld modeling with CBAR and CWELD elements on stiffness and fatigue life predictions
• Compare to physical coupon test results• Help harmonization activity
Testing Parameters: • Element quality (CBAR) : best, worst• Connection configurations (CWELD) : best, worst1, worst2• Sheet metal thickness: 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm/1.6 mm• Mesh size: 4.0 mm, 5.0 mm, 6.0 mm• Loading condition: lap shear and coach
peel
CBAR weld element CWELD weld element
601/01/2015
Actual Testing/ANSA Model Set-up
Lap Shear Coach Peel
MTS Coupon Cyclic Loading Setup
Lap Shear Coach Peel
Coupon FEA Models
Spot Weld
Constraints
Force
707/29/2015
Spot Weld Element Connection Configurations
CBAR Best CBAR Worst
CWELD Best CWELD Worst 1 CWELD Worst 2
CBAR • Best- Symmetrical• Worst- Skewed
CWELD• Best- Centered and aligned• Worst 1- Diagonal• Worst 2- Parallel offset
807/29/2015
Analysis Procedure
ANSA Preprocessing
• Apply Surface Mesh
• Apply Boundary Constraints and Loads
HPC SERVERRun NASTRAN job
• Utilizes Open Terminal to solve input deck at provided parameters
HYPERVIEWSolution Viewer
• Stress Solution
• Displacement Solution
nCODEPostprocessing
• Life fatigue predictions
• S-N Curves
Report• Results discussions • Conclusions
907/29/2015
Results – Stiffness
• CBAR model predicts lower overall stiffness ratio, CWELD predicts higher stiffness ratio
• CWELD Model provide stiffness ratio closer to 1 than CBAR Model.
CBAR BEST
CBAR WORST
CWELD BEST
CWELD WORST1
CWELD WORST2
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
0.77
0.85
1.20
1.05
0.90
Ratio to Test
Elem
ent C
onne
ctio
n C
onfig
urat
ion
1007/29/2015
Results – Fatigue Life
• CBAR predicts fatigue ratio closer to 1 compared to CWELD
• Overall Fatigue Life is not sensitive for both CBAR and CWELD models, less than 10% variation between the Worst to the Best element connection configurations.
CBAR BEST
CBAR WORST
CWELD BEST
CWELD WORST1
CWELD WORST2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
1.13
1.13
1.25
1.25
1.15
Ratio to Test
Elem
ent C
onne
ctio
n C
onfig
urat
ion
1107/29/2015
Element Size Influence
CBAR BEST CBAR WORST CWELD BEST CWELD WORST 1 CWELD WORST 21
1.1
1.2
1.3Fatigue Life
4mm
5mm
6mm
Element Connection Configuration
Ratio
Ave
rage
• Spot-weld structural stiffness and fatigue for CBAR and CWELD models are not sensitive to mesh element size.
CBAR BEST CBAR WORST CWELD BEST CWELD WORST 1 CWELD WORST 20.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40 Stiffness
4mm5mm6mm
Element Connection Configuration
Ratio
Ave
rage
Element Size
Element Size
1207/29/2015
Future of Project/Takeaways Contribution
• Obtain sensitivity results for Stiffness and Fatigue Life for CBAR and CWELD element types to be utilized for future conclusions
• Played a role in prospective completion of harmonization project
Next Steps:
• More parameters (element size, element quality)
• Full-production model analysis
Takeaways
• Analysis software experience
• Transferrable skills
• Exposure to global company in Automotive Industry
1307/29/2015
The Future and Beyond!
Complete Undergraduate program (VCU)
CIE Program
Master’s Degree Mechanical Engineering
Engineer in Training(EIT) EXAM
Studio Engineer/Durability Engineer
1407/29/2015
THANK YOU
Joseph Vedrody
Wilson Zhang
Dan Asmus
Michael Rowley
Cindy Gates
Joseph Johnson
Genna Edmonds
Nicholas Posey
Ram Bhandarkar
Jennifer Choi
Vanessa HawkinsBryen Irving
Stephen Scott
Vincent Marsella
Jessy Robison
Christopher Duke
Kipp Owen
Dr. Mike Guo
Stephen Tatangelo
1507/29/2015
QUESTIONS?
Thank you for your time.