Documentation Report

TTaasskk 66:: CCaappaacciittyy bbuuiillddiinngg ffoorr IICCRRMM CCeenntteerrss ooff RReeggiioonnss IIII aanndd IIIIII:: tthhee iinniittiiaall eexxppoossuurreess Establishment of ICRM Centers in Regions II and III

Part of Component B (ICRM and Biodiversity Conservation) of the Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project (ICRMP) Loan No. 2311-PHI/ Grant 0071-PHI

9 February 2012

ii

Contents

CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................... II

LIST OF ACRONYMS/ ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. IV

LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... VII

LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... VIII

INDEX OF PHOTOS .................................................................................................................................................. IX

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 2

2. CAPACITY BUILDING: EXPOSURE THROUGH PAMS‐10 – RECENT KNOWLEDGE IN PHILIPPINE MARINE SCIENCE .......................................................................................................................................................... 3

3. CAPACITY BUILDING: ORIENTATION ON RESEARCH THEMES........................................................................ 4

3.1. BASELINE KNOWLEDGE: PRE‐TEST FOR STARTERS ............................................................................................... 5 3.2. ORIENTATION LECTURES .............................................................................................................................. 6

3.2.1. Overview (Gil Jacinto, PhD) ........................................................................................................ 6 3.2.2. Expectations of participants (Melen Celeste‐Dizon, Workshop Facilitator) ................................ 7 3.2.3. Lecture: Zoning – Tool for Coastal Development Planning and Consensus Building (Marie

Antonette Juinio‐Meñez, PhD) .................................................................................................. 7 3.2.4. Lecture: MPA Crucial Entry to Marine Biodiversity Conservation and ICM (Porfirio Aliño, PhD) . 8 3.2.5. Lecture: Improving the status of threatened species (Moonyeen Nida Alava) ........................... 8 3.2.6. Lecture: Ecosystem approach to fisheries management (Vincent Hilomen, PhD)....................... 8 3.2.7. Lecture: Climate change and coastal health (Laura David, PhD) ................................................ 9 3.2.8. Lecture: What things to consider for a first approximation of a coastal segment’s vulnerability

to erosion and marine inundation (Fernando Siringan, PhD).................................................... 10 3.3. SUMMARY: RESEARCH TOPICS FOR THE BMC AND THE ZC ................................................................................ 11 3.4. OUTPUTS FROM THE PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................................. 11

4. CAPACITY BUILDING: RICS’ PREPARATIONS OF RESEARCH PROPOSALS FOR ICRMP AND SUBSEQUENT PRESENTATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 14

4.1. MENTORING WORKSHOP ON THE ECOSYSTEMS APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT (EAFM) ........................... 15 4.2. REVIEW PROCESS FOR ICRMP RESEARCH PROPOSALS....................................................................................... 16 4.3. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................... 18 4.4. PRESENTATIONS OF R&D/ ACTIVITY PROPOSALS ............................................................................................. 18

5. CAPACITY BUILDING: EXPOSURE THROUGH THE 1ST ICE CREAM NATIONAL WORKSHOP ‘REAP’ .............. 19

6. CAPACITY BUILDING: REVISITING THE DRAFT RIC SUSTAINABILITY PLANS ................................................. 21

7. CAPACITY BUILDING: EXPOSURE THROUGH THE TRAINING COURSE ON MANGROVE CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND REHABILITATION ....................................................................................................... 26

7.1. HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................................................ 27 7.2. LESSONS LEARNED .................................................................................................................................... 28 7.3. FACILITATING FACTORS .............................................................................................................................. 28 7.4. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 28

8. CONTRIBUTIONS TO ICRMP RESEARCH: PROPOSALS FROM MERF‐UPMSI AND PARTNER ACADEMIC UNITS............................................................................................................................................................ 29

9. EXTENSIONS OF THE DENR/MERF‐UPMSI MOA (PHASE I) AND THE FURTHER ENGAGEMENT OF MERF‐UPMSI IN ICRMP .......................................................................................................................................... 31

10. INPUTS TO DISCUSSIONS ON PROJECT OUTCOME INDICATORS ................................................................. 32

iii

11. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS ......................................................................................................................... 32

11.1. FURTHER ON PROCUREMENT FOR THE RICS ................................................................................................... 33 11.2. PARTICIPATION IN PROJECT‐RELATED MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS ...................................................................... 34

iv

List of Acronyms/ Abbreviations

ACRE Aparri-Cagayan River Estuary

ADB Asian Development Bank

AI Assisting institution

BFAR Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (of the Department of Agriculture, DA)

BMC Babuyan marine corridor

CAF Certificate of Availability of Funds

CDP Coastal development plan

CEO Campus Executive Officer

CF College of Fisheries

CLSU Central Luzon State University

CLUP Coastal and Land Use Plan

CMMO Coastal and Marine Management Office (of DENR-PAWB)

COSO Central Operations Services Office (of ADB)

CRM Coastal resources management

CSUA Cagayan State University at Aparri

CV Curriculum vitae

CVI Coastal vulnerability index

DAP Development Academy of the Philippines

DED Detailed engineering documents

DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources

DLSU Dela Salle University

DOST Department of Science and Technology

EAFM Ecosystem approach to fisheries management

EBM Ecosystem-based management

ERDB Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau (of DENR)

ERDS Ecosystems Research and Development Service (of DENR Regional Offices)

FAC Freshwater Aquaculture Center (of CLSU)

FASPO Foreign-Assisted and Special Projects Office (of DENR)

GEF Global Environment Facility

GIS Geographical Information System

GMSA Global marine species assessment

HEI Higher Education Institution

(continued)

v

List of Acronyms/ Abbreviations – continued

ICE CREAM Integrated Coastal Enhancement: Coastal Research, Evaluation and Adaptive Management for Climate Change

ICM Integrated coastal management

ICRM Integrated coastal resources management

ICRMP Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project

IEC Information, education, and communication

IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature

LGU Local government unit

M&E Monitoring and evaluation

MERF Marine Environment and Resources Foundation, Inc.

MERFS Monitoring & Evaluation, Response and Feedback System

MOA Memorandum of Agreement

MOOE Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses

MPA Marine protected area

MSN MPA Support Network

MSY Maximum sustainable yield

MTR Mid-Term Review Mission (of ADB)

PAMS Philippine Association of Marine Science

PAMS-10 10th National Symposium in Marine Science

PAMS-11 11th National Symposium in Marine Science

PAWB Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (of DENR)

PAWCZMS Protected Areas, Wildlife, and Coastal Zone Management Service (of DENR)

PCAMRD Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Research and Development

PCDP Participatory coastal development plan

PCO Project Coordinating Office

PCRA Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment

PG-ENRO Provincial Government-Environment and Natural Resources Office

PhP Philippine pesos

PS Personnel Services

PSC Project Steering Committee (of ICRMP)

R&D Research and development

RD&E or RDE Research, development, and extension

REAP Resiliency: Enabling Adaptive Partnerships

RED Regional Executive Director (of DENR)

RET Research, extension, and training

(continued)

vi

List of Acronyms/ Abbreviations – continued

RIC Regional ICRM Center

RING Regional ICRM Network Group

RMTU Ramon Magsaysay Technological University

RO Regional Office (of DENR and BFAR)

RPIU Regional Project Implementing Unit

RSC Regional Steering Committee

RTD Regional Technical Director

S&T Science and Technology

SCUs State Colleges and Universities (or SUCs -- State Universities and Colleges)

SCUBA Self-contained underwater breathing apparatus

SDU Sustainable development unit

SEAFDEC-AQD Southeast Asia Fisheries Development Center-Aquaculture Department

SoCR State of the Coast Report

SRTM Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

SST Sea surface temperature

SU Silliman University

SUAKCREM Silliman University-Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management

TAC Total allowable catch

TOR Terms of Reference

TS Terrestrial species

TWG Technical Working Group

UP University of the Philippines

UPLB University of the Philippines at Los Baños

UP-Mindanao University of the Philippines – Mindanao

UPMSI University of the Philippines-Marine Science Institute

UPV University of the Philippines

VA Vulnerability assessment

VP Vice President

ZC Zambales Coast

ZSL Zoological Society of London

vii

List of Tables

Page

Table 1 Lists of potential research topics, as perceived by each region, that may be pursued in the marine biodiversity corridors. Topics are categorized per research theme.

12

Table 2 Lists of competencies and skills, as perceived by each region, needed to implement the research studies in Table 1. Competencies are categorized per research theme.

13

Table 3. Revenue and expenditure forecast of RIC-II for Years 2011 – 2013 in ICRMP. 23

Table 4. Sample budget worksheet re operations for RIC-II. 24

Table 5. Indicative costs required to operate RIC-III/CLSU with the Center facility at RMTU (in PhP).

25

Table 6 Research proposals from MERF-UPMSI and partner academic units, which were reviewed and approved by Dr Angel C Alcala (SUAKCREM) and recommended for funding by ICRMP.

30

viii

List of Figures

Page

Figure 1 The context of the topics tackled during the Orientation. Source: slide from the presentation 6

Figure 2 Zoning is part of Step 2 in the CRM cycle (left) and in the PCDP process (right). Source: slides from presentation

7

Figure 3 The requirements for MPA RD&E and details of data needs for the criteria for establishment and the baseline assessment and profiling. Source: slide from presentation

8

Figure 4 Criteria (A to E) that needed to be satisfied prior to declaring a species under the threatened status. Source: slide from presentation

9

Figure 5 Fisheries dynamics includes processes that account for growth (or reduction) in fish population (or stock) size over time, such as recruitment and mortality. Source: slide from presentation

9

Figure 6 Some recommendations towards achieving coastal health for resilience to climate change. Source: slide from presentation

10

Figure 7 Example of an SRTM image with elevations analyzed and areas of similar elevations estimated. Source: slide from presentation

10

Figure 8 Similar research topics listed by the two groups (=regions) that may be pursued in both the BMC and the ZC.

11

Figure 9 RIC-II/CSUA targeted research (approved by MERF-UPMSI), planned conservation projects, and proposed IEC activities for the Babuyan Marine Corridor (BMC).

19

Figure 10 RIC-II/CSUA targeted research (approved by MERF-UPMSI), planned conservation projects, and proposed IEC activities for the Babuyan Marine Corridor (BMC).

20

ix

Index of Photos

Page

26 August 2010, Orientation on Research Themes, 3/F Conference Room, UPMSI, Diliman, Quezon City: Dr Malou San Diego-McGlone, Director of the Institute, delivering the welcome and opening remarks.

4

26 August 2010, Orientation on Research Themes for ICRM Centers of Regions II and III, 3/F Conference Room, UPMSI, Diliman, Quezon City: Core staff of the RICs and representatives from the R&D service of DENR and BFAR in attendance – (seated, left to right) Dr Esterlita Calanoga (CSUA), Dr Lenimfa Molina (new RIC-II Focal Person), Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Facilitator),Ms Maureen Aragon (BFAR-RO II), Dr Annie Melinda Paz-Alberto (RIC-III Focal Person), Ms Precious Sibulburo (CLSU), ARD Lilian Garcia (BFAR-RO III), Ms Maricel Edurain (RMTU), Ms Mary Rhovian Bakkal (RMTU); (standing, left to right) Dr Evelyn Ame (BFAR-RO II), Dr Toto Hilomen (mentor, UPLB), Ms Trinidad Tarun (DENR-RO II PAWCZMS), Prof Meliton Soriano (outgoing RIC-II Focal Person), Dr Romeo Culasing (CSUA), Engr Santiago Baconguis (DENR-ERDB), RTD Restituto Bauan (DENR-RO III ERDS), Mr Michael Lopez (DENR-RO III PAWCZMS), Dr Karl Marx Quiazon (CLSU), Dr Ronaldo Alberto (CLSU), Dr Jose Abucay (CLSU), Mr Armand Morales (BFAR-RO III), Dr Armando Espino (CLSU), Prof Rowena Sazon (RMTU), Prof Alberto de Vera (RMTU), Prof Estelita Ecalnir (RMTU), Prof. Randy Balaoing (RMTU), Ms Desiree Eve Maaño (DENR-PAWB CMMO), Dr Gil Jacinto (MERF-UPMSI), and Ms Rosario Tagana (BFAR-RO II).

14

12 November 2010, Mentoring Session on Project Development for RIC-II for the research theme Ecosystems Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM), Orange Room, Hotel Roma, Tuguegarao City: Core staff of RIC-II and representatives from the R&D service of DENR and BFAR in attendance – (seated, left to right) Dr Toto Hilomen (mentor, UPLB), Dr Eunice Layugan (CSUA), Dr Lita Calanoga (CSUA), ARD Rina Bueno (BFAR-RO II), Dr Willy Campos (mentor, UPV); (standing, left to right) Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Workshop Facilitator), Mr Venchito Villarao (BFAR-RO II), Prof Wilma Urmeneta (CSUA), Dr Leni Molina (new RIC-II Focal Person), Prof Meliton Soriano (outgoing RIC-II Focal Person), Ms Rose Tagana (BFAR-RO II), Dr Romy Culasing (CSUA), and Ms Jam Flores (DENR-RO II).

16

14 November 2010, Mentoring Session on Project Development for RIC-III for the research theme Ecosystems Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM), Guest House, CLSU, Science City of Muñoz: Core staff of RIC-III/FAC, RMTU, and representative from the R&D service of DENR in attendance – (left to right) Ms Lorenz Fajardo (CLSU-FAC-CF), Ms Marie Edurain (RMTU), Ms Angelee Romero (CLSU-FAC-CF), Dr Annie Melinda Paz-Alberto (RIC-III Focal Person), Ms Precious Sibulburo (CLSU), Dr Joe Abucay (CLSU-FAC-CF), Dr Karl Quiazon (CLSU-FAC-CF), Mr Mike Lopez (DENR-RO III), and Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Workshop Facilitator); (back) Dr Willy Campos (mentor, UPV).

17

24 November 2010, Revisiting the RICs’ sustainability (business) plans, Molave Room, DepEd Ecotech Center, Lahug, Cebu City -- Core staff of RIC-II/ CSUA working together closely, together with BFAR-RO II: (seated, left to right) Mr Vench Villarao (BFAR-RO II) and Dr Romy Culasing; (standing, left to right) CEO Dr Simeon Rabanal Jr, Dr Eunice Layugan and Dr Leni Molina

22

(continued)

x

Index of Photos – continued

Page

24 November 2010, RICs core staff at homeward bound mode from the workshop session Revisiting the RICs’ sustainability (business) plans convened at the DepEd Ecotech Center, Lahug, Cebu City – (front, left to right) Dr Eunice Layugan (RIC-II/CSUA), Dr Annie Paz-Alberto (RIC-III/CLSU), Dr Leni Molina (RIC-II/ CSUA), Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (MERF-UPMSI), Ms Precious Sibulburo (RIC-III/CLSU), CLSU President Dr Ruben Sevilleja; (back, left to right) CSUA CEO Dr Simeon Rabanal Jr, Dr Gil Jacinto (Team Leader, MERF-UPMSI), Dr Romy Culasing (RIC-II/CSUA), and Mr Venchito Villarao (BFAR-RO II).

26

3 June 2011, Training Course on Mangrove Conservation, Management and Rehabilitation, SEAFDEC-AQD, Tigbauan, Iloilo: RICs core staff convened to draft the initial mangrove management plans for the BMC and the Zambales Coast – (left to right) Ms Gella Abella (RIC-III/CLSU), Ms Helen Bangi (RIC-II/CSUA), Dr Sev Salmo III (Facilitator, MERF-UPMSI), Dr Danny Vargas (RIC-III/CLSU), Dr Romy Culasing (RIC-II/CSUA), Prof Jury Marquez (RMTU), and Prof Weng Sazon (RMTU).

29

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Report describes the capability building initiatives that were continued for the ICRM Centers of Regions II and III through their exposures to current topics in the marine sciences and their further involvement in the institutional planning process. These initiatives focused on the vision for the RICs to be hubs for biodiversity monitoring and research. Core staff of RICs II and III and RMTU were enjoined to attend the 10th National Symposium of Marine Science (PAMS-10) in September 2009 to gain perspectives on marine science in the country. An Orientation on Research Themes was held for them in August 2010 at the UPMSI to bring about a common understanding of the four research themes that the RICs shall be focusing on, hence, enable them to develop research programs that will be implemented during the period of ICRMP. Mentoring sessions on the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) were conducted separately for RICs II and III (including RMTU), in which technical inputs and guidance were provided on their specific proposals and work plans for fisheries-related research. The group also obtained further exposure on aspects of climate change and adaptation strategies for resilience during the 1st National ICE CREAM Workshop – ‘REAP’ in November 2010. In May 2011, selected staff of the RICs and RMTU went off to the two-week Training Course on Mangrove Conservation, Management and Rehabilitation, where they obtained further knowledge on mangrove ecology and experience the success of exemplary management practice in Panay.

The RICs submitted targeted research proposals, which went through a technical review process with the mentors and then accepted after revisions were approved. The RICs also discerned on priority activities for biodiversity conservation, stock enhancement, and IEC, and submitted their work plans and budgets. The R&D framework/ plans were presented to Project consultants and management during the Year-end Assessment and Planning Workshop for the Regional ICRM Centers held in Dumaguete City in January 2011. Aside from preparing for research tasks, the RICs also revisited and updated the draft sustainability (business) plans in November 2010, back-to-back with the ICE CREAM Workshop in Cebu City. These working documents are deemed to be updated further in business planning workshops that will be held for them this 2012 and in 2013.

The engagement of MERF-UPMSI has been extended until 30 March 2012 through an approved contract variation request to DENR and ADB. The extended engagement covers additional tasks that involve conducting baseline assessments on fisheries, coral reefs, and modeling sediment yield of two sites initially (Sta Ana, Cagayan and Candelaria, Zambales), seagrass/mangrove studies in Masinloc (Zambales), continued technical assistance to RICs II and III/ RMTU, and facilitating the transfer of funds to RICs II and III for their initial implementation of approved research projects. In between the preparation of documents for this extended engagement as AI for RICs II and III/ RMTU and partner of DENR in the Project, MERF-UPMSI continued to provide support to the Project, i.e., in discussions about indicators of Project outcomes, in the provision of documents for the procurement of laboratory equipment and items for the RICs (through FASPO and the PCO), in Project meetings and workshops (particularly those addressing the catch-up plans), and in other administrative matters.

2

Documentation Report

Task 6: Capacity building for ICRM Centers of Regions II and III: the initial exposures

1. Introduction

To continue with the capacity building of the ICRM Centers of Regions II and III, MERF-UPMSI (as Assisting Institution or AI) provided the core staff with exposures (national conferences and workshops) on current topics in marine science and with opportunities to discuss their respective sustainability (business) plans. The vision is for the Centers to be (a) hubs for biodiversity monitoring and research, (b) hubs for training and demonstration activities, and (c) focal points for undertaking IEC campaigns in Regions II and III. In this Task, MERF-UPMSI has put emphasis on the RICs to being developed as hubs for biodiversity monitoring and research (a), since the RICs needed inputs on the national priority R&D with respect to coastal and marine science and CRM in the country, and that they were expected to undertake research studies along these lines. The initiatives documented here include –

Attendance to the 10th National Symposium in Marine Science, 22-24 October 2009, Eden Nature Park and Resort, Toril, Davao City;

Orientation on Research Themes, 26 August 2010, UPMSI, Quezon City;

Mentoring to prepare proposals for targeted research and other key tasks (biodiversity monitoring, stock enhancement, IEC) until acceptance, in which the Sessions on Project Development with RICs II and III for the research theme Ecosystems Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM), 10-13 November 2010, Hotel Roma, Tuguegarao City (for RIC-II), and 14-15 November 2010, Guest House, CLSU, Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija (for RIC-III with RMTU) are included;

Attendance to the 1st ICE CREAM National Workshop, 22-23 November 2010, DepEd-Ecotech Center, Lahug, Cebu City; and the

Participation in the Training Workshop on Mangroves and Mangrove Management, 25 May to 4 June 2011, SEAFDEC-AQD, TIgbauan, Iloilo.

The RICs’ sustainability (business) plans were discussed amongst the core staff and together with MERF-UPMSI and the Project on the Session on RIC Business Plans held on 23-24 November 2010 at the DepEd-Ecotech Center (Cebu City).

The administrative processes involved in extending the engagement of MERF-UPMSI, in helping the Project meet the targets in the catch-up plans, and in assisting FASPO in the procurement for the RICs are described towards the end of this Report.

3

2. Capacity building: Exposure through PAMS-10 – recent knowledge in Philippine marine science

Shortly after convening the state-of-knowledge workshops with respect to coastal and marine biodiversity in Regions II and III, the RICs staff were enjoined to attend the 10th National Symposium in Marine Science of the Philippine Association of Marine Science (PAMS). The event was held on 22 to 24 October 2009 at the Eden Nature Park and Resort in Toril, Davao City. Staff from Cagayan State University-Aparri and the Ramon Magsaysay Technological University made it to the PAMS-10.

The Symposium theme From Ridge to Reef was adopted for PAMS-10. During the Opening Ceremonies, Keynote Speaker Hon. Vice-Mayor Sara Duterte of Davao City, was consistent to the theme in her talk Davao City: from Mt. Apo to Davao Gulf. Two plenary talks began the sessions of subsequent days – From Ridge to Reef: laws that bind? by Atty Marie Paz Luna (Tanggol Kalikasan) and From Ridge to Reef: Balancing the natural world with the social world by Dr Jessica Salas (Kahublagan Sang Panimalay Foundation, Inc). Other highlights of the first day were the Opening and Welcome Remarks of then PAMS President Dr Ruth Gamboa and Chancellor Gilda Rivero (University of the Philippines-Mindanao), respectively; the historical background of the organization (PAMS) by Dr Margarita de la Cruz, the Recognition of the First PAMS Officers, and the Special Parangal to Dr Edgardo Gomez.

Participants from the RIC-II and RMTU benefited from the oral presentations (in concurrent sessions; see Appendix 1) on the following during PAMS-10:

• marine ecology and physiology (marine plants, corals, reef fish, benthos, marine mammals, echinoderms, plankton, mollusks and other invertebrates);

• marine chemistry and biotechnology; • coastal resource management; • marine geology and oceanography; • land-sea interactions; • monitoring programs (oil spill, socio-economic, long-term), marine mammal

stranding, ecosystem services; • fisheries; and, • State of the Coast reports.

The RICs staff also attended the Marine Science Forum held on 24 October, where the following new marine science disciplines and replicable approaches were presented by key scientists:

• Chemical oceanography, by Dr Gil Jacinto; • Larval ecology, by Dr Wilfredo Campos; • Marine geology, by Dr Fernando Siringan; • Marine toxinology, by Dr Lourdes Cruz; and, • Physical oceanography, by Dr Cesar Villanoy.

4

Finally, the RICs staff were observers to the 22 students competing for the best paper presentation and to the special session convened by the DOST-funded ICE CREAM1 Project.

PAMS-10 was a huge gathering of over 300 participants from more than 60 participating institutions. It was organized by the Committee composed of UP-Mindanao, Davao del Norte State College, Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology, PCAMRD Zonal Center V, and the Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines-Diliman. PAMS-11 will be held on 20-22 October 2011 in Luzon, i.e., at the Development Academy of the Philippines (DAP) in Tagaytay City, and has adopted the symposium theme Coasts in the Midst of Climate Change. RICs staff and partners will be enjoined to attend PAMS-11.

3. Capacity building: Orientation on Research Themes

Project partners and staff of RICs II and III were invited to a thematic orientation on 26 August 2010 at the UP-Marine Science Institute in Quezon City (Appendix 2). The Orientation on Research Themes was organized and conducted to bring about a common understanding of the four research themes that the RICs shall focus on, hence, enable them to develop research programs that will be implemented during the period of ICRMP (until 2012) (see Orientation design, Appendix 3). It was intended to level off expectations and assess the current R&D capability of staff who are associated with the RICs in the two regions. It was also meant to provide the RIC officers and staff an opportunity to determine the potential and viability of pursuing the identified research themes in their respective sites.

In her Opening Remarks, Dr Maria Lourdes San Diego-McGlone welcomed the participants to the Institute and to the Orientation. On the research themes as significant and relevant yet not easy and somewhat overwhelming, she emphasized to the group that the question had become “Paano ba naming gagawin ito?” That the answer to the challenge at hand on how to become an effective, functioning hub for coastal and marine research, training and biodiversity monitoring, was to begin by addressing the question “What are the steps to take so that you can do research on these four themes?” Dr McGlone stated that UPMSI will try to match the RICs staff’s needs with what the Project can provide, in partnership with government agencies such as DENR and BFAR. At the end of the day, UPMSI was anticipating for the RICs to develop the research proposals accordingly and implement the research as are expected from them as Centers in the Regions.

There were 6 participants each from RIC-II/CSU-Aparri, RIC-III/CLSU, and RMTU, 4 representatives

1 Integrated Coastal Enhancement: Coastal Research, Evaluation and Adaptive Management for Climate Change

26 August 2010, Orientation on Research Themes, 3/F Conference Room, UPMSI, Diliman, Quezon City: Dr Malou San Diego-McGlone, Director of the Institute, delivering the welcome and opening remarks.

5

from DENR-Regional Offices, 1 from ERDB, 2 from PAWB-CMMO, and 4 from BFAR-Regional Offices (Appendix 4). During the Orientation, the research topics that the RICs planned to pursue were listed (in broad strokes), and existing capabilities (knowledge, skills, and competencies) of staff and institutions who will implement such research were also scored. The pre-identified options to enhance the capabilities were tallied.

3.1. Baseline knowledge: pre-test for starters

The lecturers and mentors gave the following preliminary test questions to determine the participants’ baseline knowledge on the research themes:

(1) On zoning and spatial planning –

(a) Do you know of any land zoning scheme? If yes, please proceed to (b). If no, please find out from your respective LGUs.

(b) What are the types of zones?

(c) Why are these zones established and how are they implemented?

(2) On the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management –

(a) What biological communities support fisheries in your area (e.g., gillnet fishery, hook and line fishery, ring net, etc)?

(b) How does each of these communities support the fishery?

(c) How will changes in condition of communities supporting the fisheries affect productivity?

(d) What do you understand by Ecosystem-Based Management and/or Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management?

(3) On improving the status of threatened species –

(a) When can one say that a species’ status is “Threatened”, based on the IUCN Red List criteria and categories?

(b) What do the entries “Not Evaluated” and “Data Deficient” mean under the IUCN Red List criteria and categories?

(c) What is the difference between global assessment and regional assessment when using the IUCN Red List process?

(4) On MPAs and MPA networks –

(a) What do you think are the objects of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs)?

6

(b) Discuss the benefits that can be derived from MPA networks vis-à-vis single MPA units.

(c) Differentiate between social and ecological MPA networks.

(d) Discuss some process and outcome indicators for MPAs.

The analyses of these submitted pre-tests are deferred for later, i.e., before the RICs staff begin to engage as trainors of stakeholders in the critical marine corridors.

3.2. Orientation lectures

Dr Gil Jacinto gave a short overview to bring everyone to the same plane. A summary of the participants’ expectations was then provided by Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Facilitator). The thematic lectures by the mentors/ resource persons followed, with short discussions in between the talks and listings of research topics perceived to be applicable and timely for the Babuyan marine corridor (BMC) and the Zambales Coast (ZC). A summary of topics common to the marine corridors were presented in the end.

3.2.1. Overview (Gil Jacinto, PhD)

Dr Gil Jacinto began the series of lectures for the day with the overview Research Themes for Regional ICRM Centers (RICs) of Regions II and III (Appendix 5). He briefly discussed the

Figure 1 The context of the topics tackled during the Orientation. Source: slide from the presentation

7

ICRMP conceptual model alongside the threats to coastal resources and biodiversity; the 4 components of ICRMP, particularly highlighting Components A (Policy and Institutional Strengthening and Development) and B (ICRM and Biodiversity Conservation); the relatedness of the themes and the latter’s context in ICRMP (Fig. 1); and the stage at which the Centers were in the development phase as an organization.

3.2.2. Expectations of participants (Melen Celeste-Dizon, Workshop Facilitator)

Ms Dizon showed the consolidated list of expectations that the participants submitted earlier on. In general, the participants wanted to gain a lot (including learning about new advancements) hence improve their knowledge of the four themes, which they may be able to share eventually. Ms Dizon also noted the following keywords – ‘best strategies’, ‘protocol for MPA monitoring/vulnerability assessments’, ‘management options’, and ‘ role of agencies.

3.2.3. Lecture: Zoning – Tool for Coastal Development Planning and Consensus Building (Marie Antonette Juinio-Meñez, PhD)

Dr Anette Juinio-Meñez discussed the concept and importance of zoning and spatial planning in coastal resources management (Appendix 6), a specific step in participatory coastal development planning (Fig. 2). She enumerated the objectives and guiding principles behind zoning, and the requirements of proponents participating in the process. That zoning has become one of the keys in sustaining the use and development of resources and in addressing conflicting uses and interests, because it uses scientific information as basis for decisions at the local level. Dr Juinio-Meñez provided background concepts on basic ecology and ecological principles, interconnectivity, coastal ecosystems, and socioeconomics (i.e., fishers, resource use) and then presented steps in the planning process and examples of results (as maps). The subsequent processes following zoning were also given, i.e., conduct of various workshops, forums, and consultations that lead to drafting the coastal development plan (CDP) and eventual legitimization. Zone-specific strategies/ management options (including incentives) were the final notes in the presentation.

Participatory Coastal Development Planninga planning process and a management tool;delineation of areas or zones for priority uses;addresses conflicting interests among resource-users;pro-active participation of various stakeholdersopportunity to identify development opportunities

Figure 2 Zoning is part of Step 2 in the CRM cycle (left) and in the PCDP process (right). Source: slides from presentation

8

3.2.4. Lecture: MPA Crucial Entry to Marine Biodiversity Conservation and ICM (Porfirio Aliño, PhD)

Dr Perry Aliño discussed the potential of the RICs in the establishment and development of MPAs, i.e., that the RICs could provide and facilitate inputs of accurate and timely information to decisions and actions of MPA practitioners, whose goal is the effective management of MPAs. Dr Aliño presented the objectives of MPAs, the interrelations of the four R&D themes to MPAs and to marine biodiversity conservation and the RD&E inputs (Fig. 3) targeted towards conservation outputs/outcomes of ICRMP. He explained the RD&E and the adaptive management approach to conservation, the Monitoring & Evaluation, Response, Feedback System (MERFS), PhilReefs and PhilCRM, and the connection of MERFS with the State of the Coasts Reports (Appendix 7).

3.2.5. Lecture: Improving the status of threatened species (Moonyeen Nida Alava)

Ms Moonyeen Alava introduced the group to the IUCN and the GMSA Office and then defined ‘threatened species’ and ‘Red List’. She covered the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and discussed the threat status (including the 2001 IUCN Red List categories – from ‘extinct’ to ‘not evaluated’, nature of the criteria [Fig. 4], and regional assessment) and the value of the Red List (Appendix 8). She provided details on categories under the ‘threatened’ status, the required data under each criterion, and the taxa eligible for regional assessments. Towards the end, she defined what is entailed in ‘improving the threatened status’ of a species and then showed the initiatives along these lines in the country through the GMSA, including the ‘Red Listing process’.

3.2.6. Lecture: Ecosystem approach to fisheries management (Vincent Hilomen, PhD)

Dr Toto Hilomen briefly reviewed fisheries, fisheries resources, fisheries dynamics (Fig. 5), stock assessment tools, and fisheries management measures (MSY, TAC). He provided the rationale to the shift to the ecosystem-based approach (with concepts of the food web/ trophic pyramid, the interactions among coastal habitats), the characteristics of good fisheries management utilizing

Figure 3 The requirements for MPA RD&E and details of data needs for the criteria for establishment and the baseline assessment and profiling. Source: slide from presentation

9

the ecosystem-based approach, and the primary issues associated with this mode of management (Appendix 9). He also suggested topics for research under the theme.

3.2.7. Lecture: Climate change and coastal health (Laura David, PhD)

Dr Laura David gave a briefer of life’s dependence on the oceans – (a) the ocean provides oxygen, food and livelihood, (b) oceans function as nursery grounds for other economically important pelagic fishery, (c) oceans are vital for our protection, (d) oceans are vital for the survival of endangered marine species, and (e) oceans help sequester carbon from our atmosphere. Coastal resources, while these help build resilience to disturbances associated with climate change, are sensitive to ocean health. As an example, she showed from simulation models that coral reefs could effectively dampen wave energy, thus protect coastal inhabitants – IF these would be maintained in good condition. She cited the impact of climate change scenarios to coastal resources, e.g., that thermal stress (i.e., from 2oC rise in sea surface

Global Marine Species Assessment

A Population reduction

B Restricted geographic range

C Small population size & decline

Very small or restricted population

D

E Quantitative analysis

CRITERIA

Quantitative thresholds

THREATENED CATEGORIES

Critically Endangered (CR)

Endangered (EN)

Vulnerable (VU)

Nature of the Criteria

Fisheries dynamics:

Figure 4 Criteria (A to E) that needed tobe satisfied prior to declaring a species under the threatened status.Source: slide from presentation

Figure 5 Fisheries dynamics includes processes that account for growth (or reduction) in fish population (or stock) size over time, such as recruitment and mortality. Source: slide from presentation

10

Figure 6 Some recommendations towards achieving coastal health for resilience to climate change. Source: slide from presentation

Figure 7 Example of an SRTM image with elevations analyzed and areas of similar elevations estimated. Source: slide from presentation

temperature or SST) could increase the productivity of coastal vegetation but also bleaches corals, strong storms compromise coastal integrity, and that increased rainfall could drown coasts and habitats and decrease light penetration to benthic organisms. Dr David highlighted the

anthropogenic activities that are likely to exacerbate the impacts – deforestation, groundwater extraction, mariculture, and further conversions of abandoned fish ponds. In her brief review of the country’s vision of sustainable coastal development (Fig. 6), she discussed the role of cooperation among national agencies in building resilience, national and local adaptation to climate change through continued research and public education and through the development of strategies for accelerated and synergistic effects (see also Appendix 10).

3.2.8. Lecture: What things to consider for a first approximation of a coastal segment’s vulnerability to erosion and marine inundation (Fernando Siringan, PhD)

Dr Ando Siringan briefly discussed the main effects of sea level rise due to climate change – erosion and inundation – and then went into approximations of coastal vulnerability indices (CVIs) for each. He presented CVI rubric tables for erosion and inundation and the methods to assess the extent of these processes. Coastal erosion may be assessed from shoreline change analyses

and shoreline traces. The areal extent of inundation may be initially approximated from analyses of SRTM images (Fig. 7). On the ground, profiling techniques – the Emery method and traces – may be applied. Sources (river- vs reef-derived) and granulometry of sediments also need to be determined, including the mechanisms of their transport, in order to account for possible deficits due to inundation and erosion. The presence of magnetite sands in

beaches must be noted and preferably let alone; the same case

11

for newly accreted land. In his conclusion, Dr Siringan pointed out the need for a regional approach to addressing shoreline erosion, since natural processes and human activities that cause shoreline erosion do not follow political jurisdictional boundaries (see also Appendix 11).

3.3. Summary: research topics for the BMC and the ZC

The topics under the four research themes (except zoning) that were commonly identified by the two groups (Fig. 8) were presented by Dr Hildie Maria Nacorda. There were three studies in each, except under the threatened species theme, which had four studies.

3.4. Outputs from the participants

The RICs and their partner agencies DENR and BFAR in the regions came up with an initial list of potential research topics that they deemed necessary to be pursued in their respective marine biodiversity corridors (Table 1) and the competencies required to implement these studies (Table 2). Both groups appeared similar in the topics that perceive would be necessary to pursue in their corridors and acknowledged that they fall short of the capability (skills, competencies) required for research along the themes. Thus, to enhance their competencies, participants from both regions expressed that undergoing training with the AI was necessary, on top of linking with experts and/or hiring competent staff.

Figure 8 Similar research topics listed by the two groups (=regions) that may be pursued in both the BMC and the ZC.

12

Table 1 Lists of potential research topics, as perceived by each region, that may be pursued in the marine biodiversity corridors. Topics are categorized per research theme.

Theme Potential research topics

RIC-II/ DENR-RO II/ BFAR-RO II RIC-III/ RMTU/ DENR-RO III/ BFAR-RO IIICRM Zoning, Spatial Planning and the Scientific Basis for Management

1. Bio/Eco Evaluation of Fisheries Zones in Region II

2. Assessment of Various Activities of the Resource Users

3. Biodiversity studies 4. Socioeconomic studies

1. Identification/ Inventory of existing marine and coastal resources in Zambales coasts mapping of habitats

2. Preparation of the CRM zoning (Profile) of the province of Zambales (c/o BFAR, DENR, LGUs)

3. Preparation of biodiversity maps Adaptive Management of MPAs and MPA networks

1. M&E of existing MPAs in Cagayan2. Networking effect of existing

MPAs in Cagayan 3. Comparative assessment inside

and outside MPAs 4. Carrying capacity of MPAs 5. Stock Assessment

1. Assessment of MPAs 2. Evaluation of the appropriations of

identified MPAs by the DENR and LGUs

Ecosystem-based Approach to Fisheries Management

1. Size and Season of Sexual Maturity of Economically important fish resources in Babuyan Marine Corridor (BMC)

2. Determination of optimum size of fisheries harvest/catch in BMC

3. Evaluation of existing CRM activities in the ICRMP areas

4. Governance studies

1. Impacts of Mariculture in ecosystem biodiversity

2. Stock assessment of economically important fish species

3. Impact of human activities on fishery resources (i.e., heavy metal accumulations, sedimentation, etc.)

4. Current updates on fish catch (i.e., fish species caught, volume)

5. Carrying capacity of municipal coastal 6. Ecosystem enhancement for fisheries

management 7. Fish Aggregation

Improving the Status of Threatened Species

1. Population Assessment of ludong using Red Listing Criteria

2. Red List Assessment of Endemic Species of Region 2 (Ludong, Coconut Crabs)

3. Genetic fingerprinting of suspected threatened species

4. Red-listing of commercially important species

1. Assessment of terrestrial species (TS)2. Improvement of the status of TS

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptive Management

1. Vulnerability assessment of the BMC

2. Cagayan River role in the productivity of the BMC

3. Adaptation to Climate Change 4. Resource Valuation 5. Vulnerability Assessment in the 12

coastal municipalities of Cagayan

1. Vulnerability assessment for coastal erosion and inundation

2. Sediment load measurement of selected rivers

3. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of municipal coastal areas

4. Green Belt establishment using mangrove and beach species

5. Biofuel livelihood through reforestation using Bari and Bitnog

13

Table 2 Lists of competencies and skills, as perceived by each region, needed to implement the research studies in Table 1. Competencies are categorized per research theme.

Themes Competencies/ skills required to implement the research studies

RICII/ DENR-RO II/ BFAR- RO II RIC-III/ RMTU/ DENR-RO III/ BFAR-RO IIICoastal Resources Management Zoning, Spatial Planning and the Scientific Basis for Management

• Biophysical evaluation • Awareness raising • GIS Mapping

• Knowledge in GIS • Integration and consolidation of

zonation and data base management • Identification of appropriate

management options • Analysis and Evaluation of Present

data • Identification of data gaps

Adaptive Management of MPAs and MPA networks

• Fish Visual Census • Benthic Organism Assessment • SCUBA Diving • Marine Biology

• Tools/Strategies for the Assessment of MPAs

Ecosystem-based Approach to Fisheries Management

• Sexual maturity determination • Modeling for catch size

• Best or appropriate tool/technique/ strategies to utilize in impact assessment

• Fishery Biology Improving the Status of Threatened Species

• Population assessment using Red List

• Population and habitat assessment

• Taxonomical Identification of terrestrial species using red list IUCN in coral reefs, mangroves and seagrass ecosystem

• Application and use of criteria for data gathered in order to be classified a certain species to be threatened using red list IUCN

• Tools/Techniques/Strategies for improvement of TS

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptive Management

• Climate Change Concept • Remote Sensing software use • Remote Sensing • Identification of adaptation

mechanisms

• Use of different tools for vulnerability assessment (erosion, inundation) beach tracing and profiling)

• Sediment load measurement • Engineers • Foresters • Geologists

14

4. Capacity building: RICs’ preparations of research proposals for ICRMP and subsequent presentations

The exchange of communications with RICs II and III regarding the call to prepare research proposals for targeted research in the marine corridors began on 15 April 2010 (Appendix 12), together with matrices of research/ socio-economics priority topics from the National Integrated Coastal Management and Marine Biodiversity Conservation R&D Agenda – Luzon Consultation and Workshop2 and other relevant guidelines from DENR-PAWB. Later on (August and November 2010 and February 2011), the documents drafted by Dr Angel Alcala3 were also circulated to the RICs, including links to relevant resources from various websites, although intermittently. PAWB has suggested the format for research project proposals that they were to receive, i.e., the following sections were fundamental – title, proponents with institutional affiliation (to include brief curriculum vitae), names of other research staff, rationale/ background (to include review of literature with conceptual framework, if needed), objectives, expected outputs, materials and methods (to include specific study area), budget requirements, duration of research project, implementation plan (specifying activities and schedule), and literature cited.

2 This activity was convened by DENR-PAWB last March 2011 in Quezon City (Camelot Hotel). 3 “A National IICRM & Marine Biodiversity Research Agenda for the Philippines” (25 p), “Sustainable

Financing Mechanisms for Marine Protected Areas” (21 p), “Research Selection Criteria: A Framework for Identification of Priority Research Topics and Evaluation of Research Proposals Eligible for ICRMP Funding” (16 p), and “Survey of Research Methods” (33 p)

26 August 2010, Orientation on Research Themes for ICRM Centers of Regions II and III, 3/F Conference Room, UPMSI, Diliman, Quezon City: Core staff of the RICs and representatives from the R&D service of DENR and BFAR in attendance – (seated, left to right) Dr Esterlita Calanoga (CSUA), Dr Lenimfa Molina (new RIC-II Focal Person), Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Facilitator),Ms Maureen Aragon (BFAR-RO II), Dr Annie Melinda Paz-Alberto (RIC-III Focal Person), Ms Precious Sibulburo (CLSU), ARD Lilian Garcia (BFAR-RO III), Ms Maricel Edurain (RMTU), Ms Mary Rhovian Bakkal (RMTU); (standing, left to right) Dr Evelyn Ame (BFAR-RO II), Dr Toto Hilomen (mentor, UPLB), Ms Trinidad Tarun (DENR-RO II PAWCZMS), Prof Meliton Soriano (outgoing RIC-II Focal Person), Dr Romeo Culasing (CSUA), Engr Santiago Baconguis (DENR-ERDB), RTD Restituto Bauan (DENR-RO III ERDS), Mr Michael Lopez (DENR-RO III PAWCZMS), Dr Karl Marx Quiazon (CLSU), Dr Ronaldo Alberto (CLSU), Dr Jose Abucay (CLSU), Mr Armand Morales (BFAR-RO III), Dr Armando Espino (CLSU), Prof Rowena Sazon (RMTU), Prof Alberto de Vera (RMTU), Prof Estelita Ecalnir (RMTU), Prof. Randy Balaoing (RMTU), Ms Desiree Eve Maaño (DENR-PAWB CMMO), Dr Gil Jacinto (MERF-UPMSI), and Ms Rosario Tagana (BFAR-RO II).

15

To facilitate the writing up of fisheries-related research proposals, mentoring sessions on EAFM were conducted by fisheries experts. This priority topic was accommodated for 2010 as a follow-through of the Orientation Seminar. The proposals went through a technical review process with mentors and experts of the assisting institution and then endorsed to DENR after acceptance and approval. Concept notes of the approved proposals were presented during the Year-end Assessment and Planning Workshop for the Regional ICRM Centers (Dumaguete City, January 2011).

4.1. Mentoring Workshop on the Ecosystems Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM)

The mentoring sessions were organized as venues for mentors (Dr Wilfredo Campos of UP Visayas and Dr Vincent Hilomen of UP Los Baños) to present further inputs on the EAFM concept and to provide guidance to research staff who were to contribute to fisheries-related research proposals of the RICs (Appendix 13). The sessions were held for the RICs and Project partners on 12-13 November 2010 in Cagayan (Hotel Roma, Tuguegarao City) and on 14-15 November in Nueva Ecija (CLSU, Science City of Muñoz).

The workshop in Cagayan was attended by 11 participants, i.e., six core staff of RIC-II, two (2) representatives from DENR-RO-II, and three (3) from BFAR-RO-II (Appendix 14). The participants submitted their curriculum vitae as probable proponents of the RIC research studies.

The first period of the first day was devoted to a brief introduction on the objectives of the workshop and the expectations and tasks of the group (Appendix 15). From the subsequent discussion on the current practice of fisheries management in the Babuyan Channel facilitated by the mentors, the group indicated two commercially important exploited resources in the corridor, namely the ‘ludong’ and ‘aramang’. Since BFAR disclosed that it has already allocated P5M for the R&D devoted to the ‘ludong’ and with most of the participants also involved in its implementation, the group then decided to focus on the ‘aramang’ for ICRMP. ‘Aramang’ was to be the target species of filter-net fisheries in the Cagayan River Estuary; the group also settled on the working title “Filter-net fisheries of the Cagayan River Estuary” for their research proposal.

The group agreed on the main objective of the research project that they will pursue, i.e., to characterize the filter-net fisheries of the Aparri-Cagayan River Estuary (CRE). The following specific objectives were listed – (a) to determine the composition of filter net fisheries of the CRE; (b) to study the population biology – growth, mortality, recruitment, reproduction, feeding – of selected species; (c) to determine catch, effort, and socio-economic dynamics of filter net fisheries; (d) to relate patterns in the fisheries with patterns in environmental factors; and, (e) to evaluate management scenarios on the fisheries. The group initially agreed then that one (1) research study was to be developed under each specific objective. Thus, for the rest of the day until first half of the following day, the sub-groups worked on the details of each research study, i.e., approach, methods, outputs, budgets. The group was reminded to limit all costs (PS and MOOE) within the ceiling of P1.2M per study, taxes included. On the second day, each sub-group presented the work plans and budgets to the mentors, who provided further inputs to improve the proposals. They also set timelines for submission and review of the combined proposals as one research project.

16

Seven (7) participants attended the mentoring session held at CLSU – five (5) from the Freshwater Aquaculture Center of the College of Fisheries at CLSU, and one each from RMTU and DENR-RO III (Appendix 16). After brief introductions by each participant and an overview of the workshop objectives and the expectations and tasks of the group (Appendix 17), Dr Willy Campos inquired on the fisheries-related proposals that have been already submitted for review and requested for brief presentations. Dr Joe Abucay presented their proposal “Assessment of the Effect and Impact of Aquaculture on Water Quality and Biodiversity of Marine Coastal Areas” and Dr Karl Marx Quiazon discussed his concept note on “Molecular Approach on Stock Assessments of Marine Fishes along Masinloc/ Zambales Coasts using Parasites as Biological Tags”. Refinements were suggested by Dr Campos because of budget limitations and he also consulted with the group on the possibility of drafting a proposal on sea cucumbers and mariculture in Masinloc, Zambales. The group agreed for Dr Quiazon to take the lead in writing up the proposal and integrating this with the project presented by Dr Abucay. Timelines were also set for the proposals’ submission and subsequent review.

4.2. Review process for ICRMP research proposals

MERF-UPMSI gave the RICs its guarantee to provide the guidance needed during the reviews and presentations to Project partners. Thus, following receipt of the initial submissions on 24 May 2010 (RIC-III with RMTU; “Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation Towards Sustainable

14 November 2010, Mentoring Session on Project Development for RIC-III for the research theme Ecosystems Approach toFisheries Management (EAFM), Guest House, CLSU, Science City of Muñoz: Core staff of RIC-III/FAC, RMTU, and representative from the R&D service of DENR in attendance – (left to right) Ms Lorenz Fajardo (CLSU-FAC-CF), Ms Marie Edurain (RMTU), Ms Angelee Romero (CLSU-FAC-CF), Dr Annie Melinda Paz-Alberto (RIC-III Focal Person), Ms Precious Sibulburo (CLSU), Dr Joe Abucay (CLSU-FAC-CF), Dr Karl Quiazon (CLSU-FAC-CF), Mr Mike Lopez (DENR-RO III), and Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Workshop Facilitator); (back) Dr Willy Campos (mentor, UPV).

12 November 2010, Mentoring Session on Project Development for RIC-II for the research theme Ecosystems Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM), Orange Room, Hotel Roma, Tuguegarao City: Core staff of RIC-II and representatives from the R&D service of DENR and BFAR in attendance – (seated, left to right) Dr Toto Hilomen (mentor, UPLB), Dr Eunice Layugan (CSUA), Dr Lita Calanoga (CSUA), ARD Rina Bueno (BFAR-RO II), Dr Willy Campos (mentor, UPV); (standing, left to right) Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Workshop Facilitator), Mr Venchito Villarao (BFAR-RO II), Prof Wilma Urmeneta (CSUA), Dr Leni Molina (new RIC-II Focal Person), Prof Meliton Soriano (outgoing RIC-II Focal Person), Ms Rose Tagana (BFAR-RO II), Dr Romy Culasing (CSUA), and Ms Jam Flores (DENR-RO II).

17

Coastal Resources Management in Zambales” and “Sustainable Community-Based Mangrove Resource Management Program in Zambales, Philippines”) (Appendix 18) and on 11 January 2011 (RIC-II; “The Biology, Conservation, and Management of Fisheries Resources in the Cagayan River Estuary”), the research project proposals were forwarded to the mentors for their critical review. The documents received appear to have been packaged as RIC programs and included proposed studies under targeted research, biodiversity monitoring, conservation, and stock enhancement.

The reviewers turned in their comments on the proposed studies under targeted research, which were collated and then returned to the proponents. The mentors also convened to discuss the technical merits of these studies to the marine biodiversity corridors and to ICRMP overall. They considered staff competence and skills required for the research studies, i.e., whether these needed to be worked on and/or enhanced. Further, they agreed on the refinements that were to be addressed by the RICs. After several exchanges and upon agreement to the justifications received, the mentors accepted the technical adjustments made in the revised versions received on 22 February (RIC-II) and 30 March 2011 (RIC-III with RMTU).

The research proposal “Filter-net fishery resources of the Aparri-Cagayan River Estuary (ACRE)” of RIC-II was endorsed on 23 February 2011 by MERF-UPMSI for approval by the Regional Project Implementing Unit (RPIU) through DENR-RO-II Regional Executive Director Benjamin T. Tumaliuan (Appendix 19). RIC-II Study Leaders presented their research studies during the Regional Steering Committee (RSC) Meeting held 15 March 2011 at DENR-RO-II. The Technical

14 November 2010, Mentoring Session on Project Development for RIC-III for the research theme Ecosystems Approach toFisheries Management (EAFM), Guest House, CLSU, Science City of Muñoz: Core staff of RIC-III/FAC, RMTU, and representative from the R&D service of DENR in attendance – (left to right) Ms Lorenz Fajardo (CLSU-FAC-CF), Ms Marie Edurain (RMTU), Ms Angelee Romero (CLSU-FAC-CF), Dr Annie Melinda Paz-Alberto (RIC-III Focal Person), Ms Precious Sibulburo (CLSU), Dr Joe Abucay (CLSU-FAC-CF), Dr Karl Quiazon (CLSU-FAC-CF), Mr Mike Lopez (DENR-RO III), and Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (Workshop Facilitator); (back) Dr Willy Campos (mentor, UPV).

18

Working Group (TWG) in the RSC Meeting provided inputs and suggested amendments to the proposed research project of the Center. There was also a range of topics discussed, e.g., small-scale mining and reports of mercury/ heavy metal contamination, fisheries baseline data, the ‘banwa’ management scheme for the ‘alamang’ in the past, the necessity of social preparations to prevent probable issues, the evolution of fishing gears in the estuary, and the history of moratorium on the harvest of the ‘ludong’. PG-ENRO/ Forester Robert Adap motioned for the approval of research proposal then was seconded by the TWG. The revised document was submitted by CEO Dr Simeon R Rabanal Jr (RIC-II Director/ Project Leader) to MERF-UPMSI on 18 March 2011 and was immediately endorsed to DENR-RO-II through RED Tumaliuan. It was endorsed to the PCO on 22 March 2011 (Appendix 19).

The research proposal of RIC-III with RMTU (Appendix 20) has yet to be presented to the RSC of Region III, since schedules of the proponents and of members of the TWG and the RSC in the Region as of March 2011 have been difficult to match due to obligations in the academic units and for the ADB Mid-Term Review Mission then. A window for this task may be provided within the first quarter of 2012, e.g., during a planning workshop slated for Project partners.

4.3. Administrative procedures

As early as April 2010, MERF-UPMSI has provided inputs to the suggested process for reviewing research proposals that was then being led by PAWB (Appendix 20). By September 2010, proposals were to be received, evaluated, and approved by the assisting institutions, following which were affirmations from the RPIU and PAWB. Timelines were revised and the refined process was circulated in November 2010 together with an evaluation sheet to be accomplished by the reviewers. On separate occasions, lists of approved research studies were provided to PAWB (for a report to the ADB MTR Mission) and the PMO (Appendix 21).

Discussions on financial arrangements to be adopted by the Project emerged during the Assessment and Planning Workshop held in Dumaguete City in January 2011 (Appendix 21). It was agreed then that the DENR Regional Offices were to be focal points in downloading the research funds to the RICs, hence, in contracting with them as well (instead of FASPO). In this meeting, the RICs and AIs also asserted for DENR to consider a full Year 1 budget to be downloaded as a first tranche, similar to the process being applied by DOST for its research grants to academic/ research institutions. Thus, Regional Offices II and III coordinated with MERF-UPMSI for inputs to their respective Work and Financial Plans (2011) required covering the RICs’ R&D activities (Appendix 21). In March 2011, however, the ADB Mid-Term Review Mission strongly recommended (and to which DENR agreed) for the AIs to include the RICs’ research proposals in their continued engagements with DENR, hence, designating them, in effect, as conduits of funds for the RICs.

4.4. Presentations of R&D/ activity proposals

In late November 2010, a notice for the AIs and the RICs to attend a year-end assessment workshop scheduled 7-10 December 2010 was received MERF-UPMSI. However, due to prior

19

commitments of key officials of both DENR and the Universities involved, the workshop was postponed for 25-28 January 2011. The RICs and the AIs convened at South Sea Resort in Dumaguete City for the Assessment and Planning Workshop of the RICs (Appendix 22).

RICs II and III presented their R&D proposals in the context of the specific R&D framework for their corridors. Dr Leni Molina (for RIC-II/CSUA), and Ms Precious Sibulburo (for RIC-III with RMTU) detailed their targeted research studies for the BMC (Fig. 9) and the Zambales Coast (Fig. 10), respectively. They also responded to the queries raised by MPA Specialist Dr Etienne Baijot regarding their planned initiatives in MPAs established in the corridors.

5. Capacity building: Exposure through the 1st ICE CREAM National Workshop ‘REAP’

As a follow-through to the climate change lectures during the Orientation Seminar, core staff of RICs II and III were invited to attend the 1st ICE CREAM National Workshop ‘REAP’ – Resilience: Enabling Adaptive Partnerships on 22-23 November 2010 at the DepEd-Ecotech Center in Lahug, Cebu City. This Workshop was to serve as learning venue about aspects of climate change and adaptive strategies geared towards enhancing the resilience of local communities (Appendix 23).

Figure 9 RIC-II/CSUA targeted research (approved by MERF-UPMSI), planned conservation projects, and proposed IEC activities for the Babuyan Marine Corridor (BMC).

20

The Opening Program highlighted the warm welcome of ICE CREAM Program Leader Dr Perry Aliño and by of no less than the Governor of Cebu, Hon. Gwendolyn Garcia. Subsequently, thematic talks by key administrators and an academic representative featured the Philippine Framework Strategy on Climate Change, S&T Responses to the Climate Change Challenge, Climate Change in the Philippine Setting, the Coral Bleaching Task Force, and the Albay Climate Change Program. The Posters and Photo Exhibit were opened afterwards (see also Appendix 24).

Plenary presentations in the afternoon by lead proponents of the ICE CREAM Program focused on coastal integrity, biodiversity, and fisheries. These were followed by three breakout workshops on vulnerability assessment, impact scenarios, and adaptation responses, which were facilitated also by the lead proponents. The RICs core staff attended as observers to these workshops.

In the evening, the participants attended Para el MAR, the 3rd MPA Awards & Recognition Launching at the Waterfront Hotel (Appendix 24). The event was sponsored by MSN, Conservation International-Philippines, and GTZ. Previous MPA Awardees graced the event and gave their testimonies – Hon. Jesus Fernandez Jr, Mayor of Pilar (Cebu) for the Pilar Municipal Marine Park (Winner, 2009) and Mr Rowell Batero of the MPA Management Council for the Handumon Marine Sanctuary (Winner, 2007). The evening was capped by the awarding of prizes to winners of the Photo Contest Reefs in Heat.

The second day included plenary presentations of ICE CREAM partners based in Palawan, Sorsogon, Antique, Cebu, Bohol, Zamboanga Sibugay, Zamboanga del Sur, Davao del Norte, Davao Oriental, and Davao del Sur (Appendix 24).

Figure 10 RIC-II/CSUA targeted research (approved by MERF-UPMSI), planned conservation projects, and proposed IEC activities for the Babuyan Marine Corridor (BMC).

21

6. Capacity building: Revisiting the draft RIC sustainability plans

Following the briefer on developing the RIC business plans provided by Dr Dwight Watson in August 2010 during the National Workshop held in August 2010, the RICs had an opportunity to revisit the drafts of their sustainability plans in November 2010, in a back-to-back workshop/ write-shop to the ICE CREAM National Workshop held in Cebu City (see Appendix 23). In attendance were core staff of RICs II and III led by CSUA CEO Dr Simeon Rabanal Jr and CLSU President Dr Ruben Sevilleja, respectively, and BFAR-RO II representative Mr Venchito Villarao. On 23 November, Mr Carlo Custodio and Ms Marlynn Mendoza of PAWB, and Dr Ben Gonzales and Mr Josefino Bascug of the PMC were also present.

Project Team Leader of MERF-UPMSI Dr Gil Jacinto presided the session and stated the purpose of the session in line with organizing the RICs, so these become operational. The agenda for the Workshop was presented by Dr Hildie Maria Nacorda (Appendix 25) followed by administrative updates from the PCO by Mr Bascug (Appendix 26). Dr Gonzalez pointed out that the RICs may have to commence with their targeted research studies without the Center facility in place as yet. Mr Custodio said that the CMMO shall strive to attend AI cum RICs functions and complement the technical assistance of MERF-UPMSI. The update by Mr Bascug emphasized the required documents on direct payment by ADB to the procument, which would then have been led by the RICs. Reactions to his update included the following – (a) that the detailed MOAs between DENR and the RICs were underway, i.e., currently being reviewed by DENR-FASPO; (b) that a letter from the heads of the HEIs re designating existing space/ building for renovation by ICRMP was required apart from the DEDs; (c) that purchases of equipment should not require mobilization fees, hence, payment must not be staggered; (d) that SUCs were not ‘consultants’; and, (e) that SUCs were supposed to be tax-free.

Mr Bascug explained that supplemental MOAs shall be drafted to detail the financial arrangements of ICRMP with the RICs and that checklists of requirements form the appendices of these MOAs. The issue on the procurement of equipment was to be clarified by Mr Bascug with the PCO and FASPO. Dr Nacorda explained that ADB would require its clients (DENR in this case) to have contracts with ‘consultants’ (the RICs) to enable them to download lump-sum funds directly to them. Other clarifications included (a) whether research proposals were to be packaged as programs composed of studies or as individual studies, hence ceilings of P3.365M or P1.125M would apply; (b) whether the work plans required by other Project pots, e.g., conservation projects and stock assessments did not need any detailed proposals; (c) an explanation of ‘conservation projects’ and what these covered; and (d) whether taxes of 12% or 27% (12% VAT + 15% withholding tax) were to be built-in in the budget ceilings. Subsequently, the possible sources of funds for operating the Centers were discussed.

Core staff of RICs II and III devoted the next hours and half of the following day (24 November) to work out their respective budgets for the targeted research, conservation projects, and activities for stock enhancement and IEC. Electronic files of their updated sustainability (business) plans were turned in before the end of the session.

22

24 November 2010, Revisiting the RICs’ sustainability (business) plans, Molave Room, DepEd Ecotech Center, Lahug, Cebu City -- Core staff of RIC-II/ CSUA workingtogether closely, together with BFAR-RO II: (seated, left to right) Mr Vench Villarao (BFAR-RO II) and Dr Romy Culasing; (standing, left to right) CEO Dr Simeon Rabanal Jr, Dr Eunice Layugan and Dr Leni Molina

By January 2011, updated versions of the drafts were submitted to MERF-UPMSI (Appendices 27 and 28). Although these may need to be restructured formally, the documents have identified the sources of revenues, i.e., fees from environmental monitoring, laboratory/ analytical services; consutancies regarding ICRM; contract research; production of IEC materials which will be for sale to the public; training/ seminar workshops with corresponding fees; and diploma courses on CRM. The target market/ consumers/ clients were also mentioned – undergraduate and graduate students, LGUs, private institutions, related projects of other agencies, and international funding organizations. Pricing for the services, competition (other service providers in the area), marketing plans/ strategies, financial projections, and the key drivers of revenues and costs needed to be listed down and articulated. Based on the information provided in the draft plans, the preliminary cash flow and budget tables of RIC-II (cf. sample tables from Dr Watson) (Tables 3 and 4) and the indicative costs to run RIC-III with RMTU (Table 5) are shown below. These working versions are deemed to be discussed further and updated in business planning workshops to be conducted in 2012 and 2013.

24 November 2010, Revisiting the RICs’ sustainability (business) plans, Molave Room, DepEd Ecotech Center, Lahug, Cebu City – (above photo) Core staff of RIC-III/ CLSU Ms Precious Sibulburo (left) and Dr Annie Paz-Alberto (right) revising their budgets; (photo at right) Dr Eunice Layugan (standing) consulting with Dr Alberto on budgets

23

24

25

26

7. Capacity building: Exposure through the Training Course on Mangrove Conservation, Management and Rehabilitation

In March 2011, invitations were sent out to RICs II and III and RMTU requesting for nominations of participants to the 1st Training Course on Mangrove Conservation, Mangement and Rehabilitation (Appendix 29). MERF-UPMSI believed that this was a timely opportunity for the RICs core staff to gain further knowledge and experience, considering that the RICs would be embarking on research and conservation activities on mangroves in both the BMC and the Zambales Coast. The six (6) nominees and their accomplished information sheets were submitted to the organizers at SEAFDEC-AQD from late March to early April 2011; SEAFDEC-AQD, in turn, sent the formal acceptance letters to the participants in mid-April (Appendix 29). Mangrove Specialist then Mr Severino Salmo III joined the Course to assist the participants of RIC-II, RIC-III, and RMTU in learning further on mangrove ecology and management, assist and facilitate in generating knowledge and lessons for sustainable mangrove management practices,

24 November 2010, RICs core staff at homeward bound mode from the workshop session Revisiting the RICs’ sustainability (business) plans convened at the DepEd Ecotech Center, Lahug, Cebu City – (front, left to right) Dr Eunice Layugan (RIC-II/CSUA), Dr Annie Paz-Alberto (RIC-III/CLSU), Dr Leni Molina (RIC-II/ CSUA), Ms Melen Celeste-Dizon (MERF-UPMSI), Ms Precious Sibulburo (RIC-III/CLSU), CLSU President Dr Ruben Sevilleja; (back, left to right) CSUA CEO Dr Simeon Rabanal Jr, Dr Gil Jacinto (Team Leader, MERF-UPMSI), Dr Romy Culasing (RIC-II/CSUA), and Mr Venchito Villarao (BFAR-RO II).

27

and facilitate the initial formulation of mangrove management plans for the RICs’ respective corridor assignments.

7.1. Highlights

The Training Course covered four general session types – (1) lectures, (2) field practicals, (3) site visits and community interactions, and (4) mangrove management planning. The role of the Zoological Society of London (ZSL, a non-government organization) in the entire Training Course was emphasized. For the lecture sessions, the topics discussed were mangrove ecology, biology and taxonomy; rehabilitation and management strategies; policy; resource and economic valuation; mangrove mapping; community organizing; and climate change and mangroves. Some important concepts discussed included species zonation, ecological and socio-economic importance of mangroves, natural and anthropogenic causes of mangrove degradation, mangrove management approaches, mangrove plantation and nursery management practices, and reversion of aquaculture ponds to mangroves, among others.

The three-day field trip in Katunggan It Ibajay (KII) Mangrove Eco-Park in Ibajay (Aklan) was highlighted by actual observations of healthy natural mangrove stands. This Eco-park was the site for practical mangrove taxonomy and observations of eco-tourism projects. A mangrove habitat and resource mapping exercise was also demonstrated and practiced. This mapping exercise was deemed to contribute significantly to mangrove assessments and mapping to be undertaken by RICs II and III/ RMTU in their respective corridors.

Site visits and community interactions spanned five days and covered five municipalities. Courtesy calls were made with the municipal government and barangay officials as well as with the host people’s organizations prior to actual mangrove site visits. The specific contributions of these three sectors in mangrove management programs of the respective municipalities were shared (i.e., POs on manual labor, the municipal government and barangay officials on funding and policy support). Mangrove planting was the general management strategy used in all the sites, although approaches varied per municipality. The strategies used also varied, i.e., planting at seafronts, assisted regeneration, mangrove nursery management, and planting in abandoned aquaculture ponds. In the site visits, the most significant highlight was in Leganes, Iloilo, where the municipal government had successfully implemented the reversion of abandoned aquaculture ponds into s mangrove planting project.

The session on mangrove management planning started with a brief lecture on the formulation of management plan. A subsequent writeshop completed the planning exercise. However, although this session was supposedly the principal reason for the participation of the RICs, the details have been limited from the lecture and a reference management plan from any of the ZSL sites visited was not provided. In facilitating the planning workshop for the group for 1.5 days, Mr Salmo noted that the participants, as members of the academe and now part of the ICRM Centers, would welcome opportunities to contribute to the management planning process, knowing that the DENR and BFAR have the authority over the process. Thus, rather than formulating a management plan, the group drafted a research action plan for each respective corridor to complement the mangrove management planning process (Appendix 30).

28

7.2. Lessons Learned

The establishment of remaining natural mangroves as protected areas would be an effective means to conserve, protect, and manage mangroves. Mangrove planting, as a management strategy, must be carried out only if the site previously had mangroves. In case planting would be warranted, several technical and ecological factors must be seriously considered, i.e., recognition of species zonation, planting above mean sea level, and multi-species planting. Site suitability assessment should be conducted prior to any mangrove planting activities.

Mangrove planting was deemed to be more effective if efforts are concentrated on abandoned aquaculture ponds. If rehabilitated, these aquaculture ponds may become an effective greenbelt that requires low maintenance (e.g., regular algal clearing) compared with seafront planting. The legal-institutional process involved in reverting aquaculture ponds therefore needs the proactive engagement of DENR and BFAR. Only these institutions have the sole mandate on the matter thus, making their participation very crucial. The success of any mangrove rehabilitation program will heavily rely on the engagement of local stakeholders, e.g., peoples’ organizations, barangay and municipal government officials. Support mechanisms such as information campaigns, planning and assessment, community organizing, and mobilization activities must therefore be regularly conducted.

7.3. Facilitating Factors

The Training Course was carefully designed and has excellent resource persons. The topics discussed were very appropriate and the participants were very cooperative during the Course. There was also healthy sharing of knowledge and experiences among participants.

As all participants of the group were from the academe, the ecological topics discussed were understood easily. One participant (Prof. Rowena Sazon, RMTU) even had mangrove assessment and mapping experience in Zambales.

Site visits and community interactions were very instrumental in witnessing the actual mangrove management practices. The sharing sessions with the POs provided the opportunity for the participants to draw lessons and identify potential problems in managing their respective mangrove rehabilitation programs. Most of the municipal governments have proactive role in supporting the POs, providing funds, and formulating policies (particularly in Ibajay, Aklan and Leganes, Iloilo). Clearly, these project sites benefited from the institutional support provided by the ZSL through Dr Jurgenne Primavera.

7.4. Recommendations

For the benefit of more who can potentially help in mangrove conservation efforts, a similar training course could be conducted in Cagayan and Zambales. The RICs need to coordinate and collaborate with DENR and BFAR on the immediate delineation of appropriate sites for a mangrove rehabilitation program. Site visits in Pagbilao, Quezon and in Masinloc, Zambales to may be integrated in the training course for observations of multi-species, natural (and healthy)

29

mangrove stands. A pro-active activity would be to continue with mapping out mangroves and abandoned fish ponds. Lastly, based on ecological criteria, there is urgency in identifying and mapping our potential mangrove rehabilitation areas.

8. Contributions to ICRMP research: proposals from MERF-UPMSI and partner academic units

A call for proposals received in February 2011 from the PCO was forwarded to colleagues at the University of the Philippines – Diliman, Dela Salle University (DLSU), and to Specialists formerly affiliated with Conservation International-Philippines who have existing and/ or previous research engagements in the BMC and in Zambales. Project documents that have been provided to the RICs for the development of their research proposals (see page 14 of this Report) were similarly shared with them. From March to June 2011, concept notes/ proposals were received in response to the invitation (Table 6).

The documents, together with the proponents’ curriculum vitae, were forwarded to Dr Angel C Alcala of Silliman University-Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management (SUAKCREM), who evaluated the technical aspects of the proposals. On his acceptance of the revised versions or of replies to clarifications he raised with the proponents (Table 6; Appendix 31), the research proposals were deemed recommended for funding by ICRMP. Brief descriptions of these reviewed research projects are given in Appendix 32. These were packaged together with the commissioned baseline studies, RICs research and other activities, and MERF-UPMSI’s technical assistance, and, in theory, forming the second contract of engagement with DENR for the Project. Because of funding limitations at DENR for 2011, however, only research project (3) was accommodated (Table 6) and with activities to be pursued only for three months.

3 June 2011, Training Course on Mangrove Conservation, Management and Rehabilitation, SEAFDEC-AQD, Tigbauan, Iloilo: RICs core staff convened to draft the initial mangrove management plans for the BMC and the Zambales Coast – (left to right) Ms Gella Abella (RIC-III/CLSU), Ms Helen Bangi (RIC-II/CSUA), Dr Sev Salmo III (Facilitator, MERF-UPMSI), Dr Danny Vargas (RIC-III/CLSU), Dr Romy Culasing (RIC-II/CSUA), Prof Jury Marquez (RMTU), and Prof Weng Sazon (RMTU).

30

Table 6 Research proposals4 from MERF-UPMSI and partner academic units, which were reviewed and approved by Dr Angel C Alcala (SUAKCREM) and recommended for funding by ICRMP

Title of Research Project/ Study/ Duration Lead proponent(s)/

Institutional Affiliation Proposed budget5

1. Coastal oceanography of Cagayan and Zambales (2 Studies) a. Study 1. Cagayan River plume dynamics and

implications on coastal water productivity (18 months) b. Study 2. Hydrodynamic modeling for mariculture

carrying capacity in Masinloc, Zambales (18 months) Submitted to SU June 2011

Cesar L Villanoy, PhD Marine Science Institute University of the Philippines – Diliman

1,875,396.00

892,698.00

982,698.00

2. Genetic diversity and connectivity of Siganus fuscescens along the N Luzon Coast (2 Studies) a. Study 1. Spatial distibution and ecological studies of

distinct phylogenetic lineages (12 months) b. Study 2. Population genetic connectivity based on

microsatellite markers (6 months) Submitted to SU March 2011; approved by SU April 2011

Rachel June Ravago-Gotangco, PhD Marine Science Institute University of the Philippines – Diliman

1,604,615.00

784,049.00

820,566.00

3. Towards an ecosystem-based management of mangroves and seagrasses in the Philippines (3 Studies) a. Study 1. Determination of the present extent of

mangroves and seagrasses in selected biodiversity corridors (14 months)

b. Study 2. Characterization of the ecological and bio-economic factors associated with seagrass and mangrove management (12 months)

c. Study 3. Development and application of a bio-economic model towards an EBM of mangroves and seagrasses (12 months)

Submitted to SU March 2011; approved by SU April 2011

Rene N Rollon, PhD Institute of Environmental Science and Management University of the Philippines – Diliman Maricar S Samson, PhD Wilfredo Roehl Y Licuanan, PhD Dela Salle University

3,449,373.67

1,499,843.67

1,079,440.00

870,090.00

4. Development of vulnerability assessment methods for climate change impacts on biodiversity of habitat-forming marine species (2 Studies) a. Study 1. Development of VA protocols and

methodologies to allow for the collection and interpretation of data on the sensitivity, exposures, potential impact, and adaptive capacity of coastal habitats and communities to climate change (6 months)

b. Study 2. Pilot testing of the VA methods for climate change impacts on biodiversity of habitat-forming, marine species (6 months)

Submitted to SU March 2011; approved by SU May 2011

Wilfredo Roehl Y Licuanan, PhD Maricar S Samson, PhD Dela Salle University

1,640,500.00

786,300.00

854,200.00

4 see Appendix 32 for brief descriptions 5 In Philippine pesos; all GOP taxes and overhead costs excluded

31

Title of Research Project/ Study/ Duration Lead proponent(s)/

Institutional Affiliation Proposed budget5

5. Vulnerability assessment of coastal fisheries to climate change in the northern Philippines (2 Studies) a. Study 1. Characterization of the coastal fisheries of

Masinloc and development of VA tool (12 months) b. Study 2. Characterization of the coastal fisheries of Sta

Ana and development of VA tool (19 months) Submitted to SU May 2011; approved by SU July 2011

Samuel S Mamauag, PhD Marine Science Institute University of the Philippines – Diliman

2,473,000.00

1,109,150.00

1,363,850.00

6. Humpback whales in the Babuyan Islands: research, education and conservation (15 months)

Submitted to SU March 2011; approved by SU July 2011

Jo Marie Acebes, DVM Murdoch University – Perth

1,600,025.00

9. Extensions of the DENR/MERF-UPMSI MOA (Phase I) and the further engagement of MERF-UPMSI in ICRMP

MERF-UPMSI requested for extensions of its MOA with DENR for Phase I of technical assistance (Appendix 33) to cover the completion of the Documentation Report for Task 6 (5th deliverable) and the initiation tasks with RICs II and III, which included conducting functional operations orientation, sampling and analyses standardization workshops, adoption of an operations manual and drafts of conservation agreements. The extension of up to 31 March 2011 was granted by Secetary Ramon J.P. Paje. However, other matters have been in the way of the timely submission of the Report, notably, assisting FASPO-FPU in the documents required for the procurement of laboratory equipment and supplies for the RICs (Appendix 34), and planning activities with the PCO and compliance with regards to MERF-UPMSI’s further engagement.

DENR has indicated that the AIs needed to be further engaged for the continued implementation of ICRMP and, more specifically, to (1) generate the required baseline data for monitoring biodiversity and the ICRMP output indicators; (2) conduct/ supervise the RICs’ implementation of relevant researches within the remaining life of the Project; and (3) further enhance the capacity of the RICs, through training and mentoring, so that they are able to perform their role in their assigned critical marine corridor and in ther respective regions in general (cf. Terms of Reference drafted by DENR and approved by ADB in May 2010; Appendix 35). MERF-UPMSI provided corrections to this general document and specified the provinces of Cagayan and Zambales and RICs II and III in its TOR for this further engagement (Appendix 36). On 24 January 2012, MERF-UPMSI submitted the required documents to DENR (Appendix 37), which included cost estimates, justifications for items in the contract variation (including a compilation of CVs, TORs of personnel support, descriptions of research projects/ studies, and details of costs per study), the amended version of the original lump-sum contract, and a certification from the Chairman of the Board of MERF re Authorized Representative of the organization. MERF President Dr Villanoy received on 7 February 2012 the accorded approval of the contract variation request through a formal letter from DENR (Appendix 38).

32

10. Inputs to discussions on Project outcome indicators

During the MTR Mission of ADB in March 2010, the AIs responded to inquiries from the Mission regarding targets and indicators for the Project’s outcome (Appendix 39). Dr Perry Aliño shared the 1994 article “A Review of the Status of Philippine Reefs” (authors Gomez ED, PM Aliño, HT Yap and WY Licuanan; Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol.29, Nos 1-3: 62-68). Additional inputs were provided by Dr Hildie Maria Nacorda, citing accounts and information from Reefs at Risk Revisited (Burke et al 2011), Nañola et al (2006 and 2010), Arceo et al (2008), and Weeks et al (2009), and PhilMarSaSt (2004). The list of indicators suggested included the following –

• 10% reduction of excess fishing effort; • 100% reduction in the incidence of destructive/illegal fishing; • ___ hectares of existing MPAs with improved management -- the Regional Offices might

know better on the number of hectares of existing MPAs. The Project could show that out of the X number of MPAs with so-and-so hectarage, at least 50% will be effective based on governance and ecological criteria;

• at least 1,360 hectares of coral reefs designated as MPAs or LMMAs -- this is based on 68 cooperating municipalities x 20 hectares recommended size of new MPAs (cf. EcoGov2); and,

• ___ hectares of abandoned mangrove and/ or fishpond areas reforested (to help mitigate land-derived siltation). (The PAM indicated 7,000 ha in existing mangroves and 2,000 ha to be re-established. Since we believe 20% improvement in density will not be realized in 2013 if planting 2,000 ha has just begun, perhaps survivorship of 80% after 1 year of planting would be a better indicator.

Dr Aliño suggested to add sedimentation load, i.e., reduce sediment load by 5% due to improved coastal and watershed use. Prior to these, the following indicators were also suggested –

• Instead of 10% improvement over baseline of fisheries resources, we suggest maintenance of or 10% increase in the standing stock of target species, e.g., siganids and groupers, and reduction in fishing effort (e.g., 10% of fishers in excess of fishing capacity not engaged in fishing anymore); and,

• Instead of 10% improvement of hard coral cover, we suggest maintenance of healthy reefs by reducing threats by 10% and reduction of destructive fishing activities (e.g., by as much as 80% especially in MPAs).

11. Administrative matters

MERF-UPMSI assisted FASPO Procurement Unit in its documents for the acquisition of laboratory equipment and supplies for the Centers. This task came about during the January 2011 workshop in Dumaguete. The proposal for the RIC-III Learning Resource Center is also summarized.

33

11.1. Further on procurement for the RICs

The workshop in Dumaguete City identified priority basic equipment and items for the RICs from a list provided by MERF-UPMSI –

Table 7 Priority basic equipment and items (red bold italics) listed by the RICs and AIs on 27 January 2011, during the workshop in Dumaguete City.

1 Plankton Nets 7 For Boat1.1 Phytoplankton net 7.1 Hand-held radio; mobile phone units instead1.2 Zooplankton net 7.2 GPS with echo sounder 1.3 Ichthyoplankton net 7.3 Megaphone2 Water Quality 8 Laboratory2.1 Salinity refractometer 8.1 Dissecting Stereoscope, 70-300x 2.2 Secchi disks – to be fabricated instead 8.2 Compound microscope, mechanical stage, 38-2.3 Niskin sampler - 5L 1000x2.4 YSI 650: conductivity, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, depth with 50m cable

8.3 LCD TV/monitor - 32"8.4 LCD projector

3 Sediment Sampling 8.5 Desk top computer8.6 Notebook computer 3.1 Ekman dredge/ grab

3.2 Gravity corer 8.7 General purpose fume hood 3.3 Sieves for saltwater use 8.8 Top loading balance, 1000 g capacity, 0.1 g 4 Surveys sensitivity4.1 GPS with echo sounder 8.9 analytical balance, 200 g capacity, 0.0001 g 4.2 Digital camera with housing sensitivity4.3 Submersible digital camera (prosumer) 8.10 Dissection Trays/Kits

8.11 UV-Vis spectrophotometer 4.4 Digital video camera with housing4.5 Hand-held radios (RANGE at least 5km) 8.12 Ro-Tap Sieve Shaker

8.13 Drying Oven 4.6 Stainless steel quadrats 4.7 30-m/ 50-m/ 100-m measuring tapes, numerous meter sticks

8.14 Desiccators8.15 Pressure cooker

4.8 tide gauge 8.16 DO meter8.17 pH meter with probe & standards

4.9 Binoculars 8.18 Redox meter with probe & standards 4.10 Field Guides 8.19 Hot plate4.11 Ice chests 8.20 Magnetic stirrer5 Specimens Display 8.21 Bench-type centrifuge5.1 Assorted holding tanks: 20-500 gallons 8.22 Vacuum pump5.2 Flow-through system capability 8.23 filtration set-up5.3 Shallow water touch tanks 8.24 Filtration/reverse osmosis system 5.4 Filtration systems including heaters and UV sterilizers

8.25 Chest type freezer8.26 2-door refrigerator

5.1 Assorted holding tanks: 20-500 gallons 8.26 Assorted Glassware5.2 Flow-through system capability 8.27 Power generator6 Long-term Monitoring 8.28 Pipettors, 100-8000µl, 10-100µl 6.1 MET Station for temperature, humidity, rainfall, wind speed/direction, barometric pressure and solar radiation – see Davis Instruments

8.29 Liquid nitrogen tanks9 Office 9.1 desktop computers – iCore 5 to 7 (not Pentium)

34

8 Laboratory (continued) 9.2 fax/ scanning machine 9.8 Air conditioning units (see individual RICs list for 9.3 LCD projector quantity & specifications)9.4 Modular Conference Table 9.9 Conference Table 8-seater 9.5 Vertical filing cabinet 9.10 Clerical chairs9.6 Visitor Sofa 9.11 Clerical tables9.7 Wire binding equipment 9.12 Laminating machine

The technical specifications and quantities of each of these were provided in the standard form from FASPO. These were checked by the RICs, who subsequently sent their concurrence to FASPO. Indicative prices of the items were also provided as requested (see Appendix 34).

The draft proposal for the establishment of RIC-III Learning Resource Center is attached in this Report as Appendix 40. The document justifies the need for a repository of CRM knowledge products that will be consolidated and generated by ICRMP. It details the work plan and the equipment required; the latter has been assured by ICRMP on various occasions and the technical specifications are provided in the document for some of the items. The projected cost for equipment alone was P1.79M. This proposal shall be discussed early this year with the PCO, in time for negotiations of continued engagement of MERF-UPMSI as AI.

11.2. Participation in Project-related meetings and workshops

MERF-UPMSI attended aseven (7) Project meetings (at least) and two (2) workshops organized by DENR through the PCO and/ or PMO (invitations/ programs in Appendix 41) –

1. Project Steering Committee Meeting for ICRMP (12 January 2011) at DENR (Dr Gil Jacinto);

2. Year-end Assessment and Planning Workshop for the Regional ICRM Centers (25-28 January 2011) at the South Sea Resort, Dumaguete City (Drs G Jacinto, Perry Aliño, and Hildie Maria Nacorda) – Dr Aliño presented progress in the undertakings of MERF with RICs II and III (Appendix 42);

3. ADB Mid-Term Review Mission: Kick-off Meeting (18 February 2011) at PAWB (Dr G Jacinto);

4. ADB Mid-Term Review Mission: Wrap-up/ Project Steering Committee Meeting (15 March 2011) at DENR (Dr G Jacinto);

5. Regional Steering Committee Meeting (Region II) (15 March 2011) at DENR-RO II (Dr HM Nacorda), during which the proposals for RIC-II’s targetted research project composed of three (3) studies in the Aparri-Cagayan River Estuary were presented and approved by the Committee (see also section 4.2 of this Report);

35

6. National Integrated Coastal Management and Marine Biodiversity Conservation Research and Development Agenda – Luzon Consultation and Workshop (16 March 2010) at the Camelot Hotel, Quezon City (Drs G Jacinto and PM Aliño);

7. Project Management Meeting with AIs (23 March 2011) at DENR to discuss contract details, implementation of baseline studies, resource assessments, monitoring and conservation activities, and finalization of outcome indicators and other matters (Drs G Jacinto, PM Aliño, and HM Nacorda);

8. Project Steering Committee Meeting of ICRMP (3 August 2011) at DENR (Dr G Jacinto); and,

9. Project Management Meeting with MERF-UPMSI (12 August 2011) at DENR to review the Special Conditions of the proposed AU contract clauses and other matters (Drs Cesar Villanoy, G Jacinto, HM Nacorda, Ms Jean Brimbuela, and Ms Marites Pangilinan).