3t qj -2658/2011/51i'1'r - rajasthan · '11i'1 * e wpi•' tqtzt apft t...

6
3T 1 Qj *4I -2658/2011/51i'1'R 'H5N.1cP 3Icrc1, (4111Rrici r—'ft' iiii 1'1FH *i*1 1c) 1 1qM7, 1I c4 -JJ• e1k"ii, 1I'1'k1 I it 31PR1 '1.PuIi I &TI5 .. . .3TT C1Ic 3TT5 Prft f-iici' , 31.05.2017 1 u.q 1. 3[2.11_fT 4 1 VT 31 z yIcç1 (3)c' - 1), ciiFiRycp €c (Ri 3n4 "31'1k1 3T1rr' ?T iiii) * 1T 3Tc'I 1's.I 147/1I/1h -Ilk/2010-11 t '-iiRci 31II Ruiic 24.02.2011 * 1.5 WrsR-qTff 9T RiIci ZR 341rf?TT, 2003 (1i 3IT4 "3T11P1Tr' TT iiii) CTPJ 83 * 3M4ci 1*c,c1 it TRft *, 1i'i II 5I'4ct) 31RJtc:1, r4ftlf , zr—fi, siii (rii 3TFt "*iiqi T15T" T u1III) 9M -iiRci 3III 1IICP 29.03.2010 # 31k14ff - cf)7 7ft 'Y 4,21,286/— 11 Mtji tcM \I1I 45,472/— I1 311 11*cl 1ii *1 2. cP' U cp I f5 TT2 cI c 51 ' -ffm 2007-08 * TIT 3II1 Ry /11ci'1i ,1*c,c1 ZA I ri'.ic 311dI f I 34TZ 5,31,16,990/— qR ffcfff F1ct 1,27,34,100/— 'i's.i * R ZR Ict) 3,62,10,619/— 1 T4) 1ç) 41,72,261/-9 1I cc15I I-1I0I I'r4 * -1'sc1 c414i1i'l - I 1 1I, 1flc1,, T - T 2 4T V f {11juI Ic 1i 7MT 2006-07 * 31c14c1 'cIr t.1Jc1 c115I1-i 3,47,77,607/-- -iii, cp-1I1 tt I-fle1I it e1IIc1I .............2

Upload: others

Post on 06-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3T Qj -2658/2011/51i'1'R - Rajasthan · '11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T 3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

3T1 Qj *4I-2658/2011/51i'1'R

'H5N.1cP 3Icrc1, (4111Rrici r—'ft' iiii

1'1FH

*i*1 1c)11qM7, 1I c4-JJ•

e1k"ii, 1I'1'k1 I

it 31PR1 '1.PuIi

I &TI5 .. . .3TT

C1Ic

3TT5

Prft f-iici', 31.05.2017

1 u.q

1. 3[2.11_fT41 VT 31 z yIcç1 (3)c'-1), ciiFiRycp

€c (Ri 3n4 "31'1k1 3T1rr' ?T iiii) * 1T 3Tc'I 1's.I

147/1I/1h-Ilk/2010-11 t '-iiRci 31II Ruiic 24.02.2011 *

1.5 WrsR-qTff 9T RiIci ZR 341rf?TT, 2003 (1i 3IT4 "3T11P1Tr'

TT iiii) CTPJ 83 * 3M4ci 1*c,c1 it TRft *, 1i'i II

5I'4ct) 31RJtc:1, r4ftlf , zr—fi, siii (rii 3TFt "*iiqi

T15T" T u1III) 9M -iiRci 3III 1IICP 29.03.2010 # 31k14ff

-cf)7 7ft 'Y 4,21,286/— 11 Mtji tcM \I1I 45,472/— I1

31111*cl 1ii *1

2. cP' U cp I f5 TT2 cI c 51 ' -ffm

2007-08 * TIT 3II1 Ry /11ci'1i ,1*c,c1 ZA I ri'.ic 311dI f

I 34TZ 5,31,16,990/— qR ffcfff F1ct 1,27,34,100/— 'i's.i

* R ZR Ict) 3,62,10,619/— 1 T4) 1ç)

41,72,261/-9 1I cc15I I-1I0I I'r4 * -1'sc1 c414i1i'l -I 11I,

1flc1,, T - T24T V f {11juI Ic 1i 7MT

2006-07 * 31c14c1 'cIr t.1Jc1 c115I1-i

3,47,77,607/-- -iii, cp-1I1 tt I-fle1I it

e1IIc1I .............2

Page 2: 3T Qj -2658/2011/51i'1'R - Rajasthan · '11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T 3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

- 2 - 314k1

9T T 1c1 cp RiPci

uI* cpvc

cPI T1T TT [1T cN1 ci1c *

'-N1-II, Ct5L.lh,1 5T 11b.lI 4 VTcfç cp1 tR c179II' 7TPTTT

35 ,1I1Ic1 T4, 10 PM.M i1RT 7t 53 qRlo UF zFT Ift PI -IiUI fl1T *

I1I' 53 ARi,910 \ictflI~c1 1TI -cT)7 ljF1 t4 * I5TT ICt1 ct1c1 TH

tz i5T cN1 ct1c [f *1 cc) {è

'1clI T5T 31C11' TTF Ri TZ1TI U4 cII' 7cII4 T f 45 c 57

@1 TT UF #q IkRi zff Ctc * I 31tt. c

31Il [~-iicD 29.03.2010 iI Zrg cR1I t5 3TffkT1 Zft ITT 18(1)() *

311I< 5I' IIc1 TT iI 1 ZF 31jYtc1 * &I11 tR

H4c1I *1 c4c15I 1 3,47,77,607/— '-i' * 'i'<#i, ct'-iii f

I1iclI iI si1g it i C415 * 4)es * 3i11I'< '3c'1 !11b.1I

12,603 {t1c.c'I 5T Pi-i1ui 3TT rici i1i Tmt 1,16,68,934/—

ti T 3c'II1c1 9TT * 9T ?t Ysic1 t 3rl1Mc1 * qm aTqqm

lTT jflc 1,05,32,141/— 4 qRici it

4,21,286/ — ?T T97 tiTu 31*cilcPI' ftzr# 1ii iir iu Tft

11,36,793/— tR 4 wRi,qio 1 TRT 4(2) * 3ici4ci Zr ZD7

i1i 45,472/— 31I'ilIc1 Rb'ii T1TI qR fthui 3T TT1 * 3L.4i1ctc1

3iii I"iicp 29.03.2010 * C1I 1T 'yItc1 (31i),

I1lr\31 lCP ctI * TT 3T1fRN it TFT 82 * ai4 3TtTi

3 uk {1IcP 24.02.2011 J

31 1 c'l TF aTuR tR c I * f 1T 9 I !.4 w5RTT qR

,04 rr i1Ji .ct ZR 311Ef5TT, cIc1'1I, 3i'ii'it 1'1I9

fi. (2009) 23

e11IIc1I' .............3

Page 3: 3T Qj -2658/2011/51i'1'R - Rajasthan · '11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T 3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

D

- 3 - 3)E *ii-2658/2011/9I'11 I

31'-lc. 360 (iiii

it 3141eI 1s4I 590-591/2008/3iII'1I' '.iiFci 1uf q 1'iici,

13.03.2009) iRci Piu1i * WffF t 1iii ctci ctIIc4

* PP11l k cFT ctc1 t9T T9cP 3ITT1t 1I 'lRlT * I

1e;I fu 1T

3 611 1i'i 4TFt5 TNT J4I I

4. qo7u * ti 1Ii'i 3—N1ct1 4T4T5 1T -TT 14I TFzrT

t '.1*cc1 CjU * 1I-II-d 3,4cp7 (l1I1.r ti*

r.-118.S, 31 iII'l'k tc ZTtF ii 590-591/2008/31"i"II1I( f

7Ic1 f4ft 1'iicp 13.03.2009) M\"),z5 thnTT 1T W*cc1 1eI cN1

1t1'i -1 i11cpi 31i1IcP t[ -cicPI cp) 'iii4i iiii

'I.lIo1.1 RT C1I1I{.1CPzR &iiT, ,11?cfrJYCltfrI, 3i'Ifrlk 61-119

1*I4 1c) tj 3III.thI * -qAO cIc1 (2012) 32

31Yc 03 * 3tF1PkTtZ 3TIf1E it qM 18(1) * [ i1i wTFir

'ii* L u ttrr w cp ni

?5 z41cp ie tcm cie

ti 1i '- cr<1 311 jfp i.j il TmT

11I-I- q dr 'JIN * 3ctc1 1flicp cic1 1Ii4Iic1 R1cNc1 *

311 el c A ZR fth'JT 3Tf5V T VM2ff U4 ci 6 I it 31 i çvfl t

3TiI1 11l, cpYIH it s1'lg tR t1 Itt T d11 cN1 cPI

1cPI

1i *1 31Q 3T1P 9I'11 * 1s1

9I -ICt 311 4)cpi 4-11-itq 94 'II'1lc * ji)cti

{jJCp 08.12.2011 31Y1*cl {bi 1T ITF * I 3ctc1 Z2N * TFT

3111k cpI' fcF4 irr T

1bi I

5.

ciciRil 1* C4CII.'1 RT 74 19101 5T 54 \3ctW f 47M

Ic1I {9UJ i1i 'c1-1Ic * T FIci th

el'IIc1k.............4

Page 4: 3T Qj -2658/2011/51i'1'R - Rajasthan · '11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T 3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

4

-4 - 3T4E ii-2658/2011/9I'1

ctci * f3iici c4v TT tR tNI &IfPT * 3R14c1 kzi

- r * f Rei tr TZ

31141c1 Z15 H9I'1'1'1'1 i'1 t9T zii1 I TThR2T 'I1Ic'l T Pi4.i

3Gcl IV1k TT . . i1ki () RCI'I Ri1?ii

47/2014 'T[ 31II iRci fi TMT t {ycj) - fZJ [ !,1cP.UI

'11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T

3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central

Excise, Mumbai V/s Ms National Organic Chamicals Civil Appeals No.

1130/2003 P4.I {'1ICP 06.11.2008 1I'1' \34 vWqTeM 1T CTO(A-E)

Sri Ganganagar V/s Ms. Durgeshwari Food Ltd. Sri Ganganagar S.B. Civil Se!

Tax Revision Petition No. 193-194/2009 PWILI 1'iict 08.12.2011 '1IRcl cpç

111 2ITJ e1II Trm 21T1 T VC15R '3vcl 'IV1Ic1 {u

rf 3IT * 1T 11Il4I 34 1II17 * '3Yctc1 Pu1-i * 3f1IT

M it 31'-J,YId cN-i Rq-d 141I 'ilNi 'RIIc1 qt * I

6. 9WNT l 1 tR 11 -I -I 1b .i I TFZIT [T fdur 3r1r r

31Q1 3T1TT m 1141i E15T cl'1cP1 [1I TFZrT I

7. T4I # 142 cc1I' TT 'Ir'.l * '1\Y)çc1 c1cIRIt

cpcp' 7Rlc 'l1l, cPYIH 45T '3i t IiiciI 1 1kicii [

* Pi1ui tq cp * q # fbw TFzrT t, Riii 1iicI r

Tcfff '3 c I g * I i1i 31fP T I fl t4 3Wft * tRTff

* y * 'r w cri fi Tri 'H1.l cN1 cti?.c. * lTr4 tR INkUI * YIc1 irz5 &11TI -c#t 1TT 18(1) * W4Tr9t * 31Ic1cP 11ct4 f

3 1 II.11 I lt i4lc'i') # '-jiRci PtU1.L1 Iuiicp 13.03.2009 * 1C fT1Tr TEA

PIIc1I .............5

Page 5: 3T Qj -2658/2011/51i'1'R - Rajasthan · '11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T 3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

- 5 - 34k iii-2658/2011/1I1'I

193-194/2009

['I;*'

"20. In the considered opinion of this Court, therefore, in view of specific provisions contained in Section 18 of the VAT Act of 2003, the ratio of the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondent-assessee would in fact support the case of the Revenue, and as a necessary corollary, it deserves to be held following these aforesaid judgments, that input tax credit in the present case, was rightly reduced and was allowed only proportionately to the extent of manufacturing and sale of taxable goods by the assessee in the present case, namely "Aata", "Maida" and "Suji" manufactured out of raw material (Wheat) and such input tax credit could not be allowed to the extent of sale of VAT exempted goods, namely, wheat bran (Chaff/Chokar), which has been assessed by the Assessing Authority to the extent of 25% of the input tax credit and reverse tax has been imposed on the respondent-assessee. 21. Therefore, as far as impugned order of learned Tax Board dated 13.03.2009 to the extent of setting aside the imposition of reverse tax disallowing the proportionate input tax credit is concerned, the same can not be sustained and deserves to be quashed by this Court, and to that extent the revision petitions filed by the petitioner-Revenue deserve to be allowed.

9. 41I'1'-ilL1 vc1 - I1k'lI * 3'Ctc1 Pu1 rr zft

f5 3BIc1 15 5J ZR zoq 9M * '3cI4'l * i~i7 wrT cpt

TFT I ct i 4 t, r 9M * c'.i i c frt vlf i zrf

5?T Itt TR cPz'4 -9R1 ZFT 1 I 15 f 4i1 11TT * i c1- 14 '1 *

frt vpff mi 11 %5ctIIIc1 lW * 3YIc1 31IIc1 T5

l5T 14JI'-il'31'l kT tM I

10. u1 FT5 1i g i -i 3T1IT ci I f Z[ ii

-1Nki Ti zrg 1uLL1 apft 3ftrr 9t t ctuffb 14q uf çj fcbt 7Tt

i-i-i 1i'i'1i 31)crH q*8 '15T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai V/s Ms

National Organic Chamicals Civil Appeals No. 1130/2003 1'1i I'iicp 06.

11.2008 1 -cJ,c1 -;T9 1'qi QJ ri'ic 374F IF #i'i'4) Iu1*P1 3W

-I.1Ici.l 1 Te. t. Ri1ci () 1ciii Ri1~ii 9R 47/2014 ftzFFF

tR *cilcti -Z1rM 9t t 441 ii'i' - j [u

tiRci r urF4 * yIc1 .-i1cp qici *

Q1 411c11'<. ............ 6

Page 6: 3T Qj -2658/2011/51i'1'R - Rajasthan · '11I'1 * E wPI•' TqTZT apft t 41114I \3T IIIcl'4 * ITI1 T 3flVF 1T TTFf * f5 1-1h-14)l 31CN-I ?l* 45T Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai

fu1T fb -ii 'ilNi 3I IIc ZTT &T

m-AzA 31c z ,4 Cpul [tdc 11il * t

3Ic1 dI ftJ 26 Z 3Il 1i' 411I Z

*1

11. 31I\ctdI1k 3c'1 .-41ctN Tt 'jIIcb' 3T#cft 3IfT5T T 31II

1iIcb 24.02.2011 311 k-c1 Ri ilIc1I * ffi1i aTftWM Z

{.IICt 29.03.2010 T1 Eftf cb iRi -iI 4,21,286/— T

cN-1 3ci)cPk cP RcH- 1i 'iIR1I * fTI bRJ 45,472/-

3I'Ic1 Fbi 'ilicli t Il{1 TfT280/— {c1 zit

I 3TftqTt ZT 31RI Pi f4 TT * I

12. [ U 4 -llLfl TJRJ[I

([cT)