maquetacion final

Upload: borja-fernandez

Post on 04-Apr-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final

    1/4

    FLOW MOVEMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE

    +

    ECONOMIC OUTPUT PER SURFACE AREA

    =

    ECONOMIC SECTIONS WITH INFRASTRUCTURES DIVISIONS

    The analysis deals with the following topics:Infrastructure-told within its flows.

    Spot-The territory through its economicoutput. By this way we differentiate between

    areas of high economic production thatdiffer with areas of low production witch we

    have seen it seems the same as some envi-

    ronments that have in it a radical economicchange. In most cases these infrastructures

    and economic production elements verylow had ritched to be limits between the city

    and the different predominating uses.

    INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE

    ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ

    PABLO APARICIO

    JAIME MONGE

    JUANJO AIZCORBE

    BORJA FERNANDEZ 01/04

    RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND USES

    USES

    INFRAESTRUCTURE

    TRAMWAY

    TRAIN

    ROADS

    CITY

    RIVER ANDCANALS

    INDUSTRY

    AGRICULTURE

    A

    B

    C

    DE

    FG H I

    JK

    A

    L

    M

    N

    OPQ

    R

    S

    T

    U

    V

    1000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    10000000

    + 10000000

    1000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    10000000

    10000000

    +

    1000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    10000000

    + 10000000

    INDUSTRIA

    F. VE HI CU LO F. TR EN

    AGRICULTURA VIVIENDA

    MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

    ECONOMIC SECTIONS

    F.MARITIMO

    t e r r it or ia l t igh t en up

    D

    B E

    C F G

    G7

    AGRIC

    ULTURE

    ROTTERDA

    MCITY

    INDUSTR

    Y

    CONECTIONS DIAGRAM

  • 7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final

    2/4

    10.000.000 /AO

    1.000.000

    100.000

    10.0001.000100

    ROADS FLOW

    BOATS FLOW

    TRAINS FLOW

    unbalance the economy and the flows through:1-intensifing all industrial production at higthperformance / / bust the industry -> witch willincreased flows -> reactivation surrounding

    areas -> green areas that are adjacent to currentindustry will become industrial landfills.2 - areas converted to intensive agricultureindustrial-> flows will decrease and the econo-my, part of the infrastructure will be unused. Toproduce an economy equal to the industryshould multiply by 6 the current surface of theAgriculture -> Agricultural production plants 6heights? Will produce new agricultural land-scape!3 - tolls on hight used infrastructure (if economicvariable introduced in the flow) -> unuse of thesepathways with the direct consequence of the useof secondary (linked to green spaces and zeroproduction) -> these pathways become obso-lete? Does it become the new economic gaps?We will produce cross relationships between thehight producing gaps and zero productionones?4 - set nodes where there is no flow -?5 - put all the intensive farming -> redirection offlows sometimes leading to overwork infrastruc-ture.6 huge economic endowents and recreationalgreen ring. -> increased flow at certain spots ofthe boundaries surrounding green cities. ->Reactivation surrounding areas.

    -We have been working by giving them

    a way to stich between the differentparts, whether industrial or agricultural.

    - Reuse roads with low flow to generatemore tourism or agricultural activities.

    -Reconnect the urban and rural areastaking advantage of Green zones witch

    are around infrastructure.- Dispelling saturated industrial nodes

    to win prominence in agricultural envi-

    ronments that had been forgotten.

    MOST IMPORTANT MEETING POINTSWITCH TOOK PLACE ON THEANALYSI

    1 - Areas of economic output limits arearticulated as limits

    2 - industrial areas and business parks

    in lower economic output .3 - Infrastructure as separation or

    boundary between strong economiccontrasts.

    VARIABLES

    1.economic production of surface area

    2.economic production of surface area3.economic output per surface area +

    movement of infrastructure

    ROAD STRUCTURE NIGHT 21.00

    INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE

    ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ

    PABLO APARICIO

    JAIME MONGE

    JUANJO AIZCORBE

    BORJA FERNANDEZ

    1000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    10000000

    + 10000000

    1000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    10000000

    + 10000000

    FLOW THIKNESS

    TRAFFIC CONGESTIONS

    ECONOMIC PRODUCTION

    LINES OF ACTION

    02/04 t e r r it or ia l t igh t en up

    A20 A20

    A12

    A15

    A15

    A16

    A4

    MORNING 08.00 LUNCH TIME 13.00 AFTERNOON 18.00

    DAY TRAFIC MERGE

    1000

    10000

    100000

    1000000

    10000000

    + 10000000

    I

    K U

    VQ

    S

    G7

    INTERSTICIAL DRAIN

  • 7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final

    3/4

    INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE

    ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ

    PABLO APARICIO

    JAIME MONGE

    JUANJO AIZCORBE

    BORJA FERNANDEZ 03/04t e r r it or ia l t igh t en upG7

    1

    1

    AREA: 216 HA

    5,4 KM POBLATION8,0 KM AGRICULTURE

    AREA: 576 HA

    2.8 KM POBLATION

    3.4 KM INDUSTRY

    22 KM AGRICULTURE

    AREA: 440 HA

    16 KM POBLATION

    1,6 KM AGRICULTURE

    AREA: 158 HA

    4,9 KM POBLATION

    3,15 KM AGRICULTURE

    AREA: 658HA

    14 KM POBLATION

    8000KM AGRICULTURE

    A13/E19

    E25/A20

    E25/A20

    E25/A20

    E25/A20

    A4

    A15

    A29

    A16/E19

    E25/A20 A4

    FUTURA A4

    E25/A20

    E30

    A13

    NORTH SEA

    NORTH SEA

    MONUTA TEBBENHOFF

    NIEUWLANDSEPARK

    HOEK VAN

    HOLLAND HAVEN

    MAASSLUIS

    HEMPARK

    VLAARDINGEN

    CENTRUM

    SCHIEDAM NIEUWLAND

    SURFPLAS

    DE LICKEBAERT

    3

    7 8 9

    4 6

    2

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    89

    10

    HOEK VAN

    HOLLAND STRAND

    FOPPENPLAS

    INFRAESTRUCTURE

    ECONOMIC

    USES

    SPORT

    NAUTIC

    GREEN AREA

    WILD

    BEACH

    +++ POSITIVE

    ++ POSITIVE

    + POSITIVE

    0 POSITIVE

    NEGATIVE

    ROADS

    CANALS

    RAILS

    POBLATION

    INDUSTRY

    ROADS FLOW

    AGRICULTURE

    FLUVIAL FLOW

    TRAINS FLOW

    ROTTERDAM

    NOORD

    ROTTERDAM

    CENTRAAL

    PRINSES BEATRIXPARK

    KETHEL

    ORANGEPARK

    VOLKSPARK

    VOLKSPARK

    KRIMPENHERHOUT

    WETERINGBOS

    ZWANENEILAND

    DE VEERPLAAT

    KLEIN PROFIJT

    DE JOHANNAPOLDER

    OEDEVLIETSEPARK

    ZWANENEILAND

    PARK MOLENVLIET

    MIDDENWETERINGPARK

    PARK

    ZESTIENHOVEN

    VROESENPARK

    WIJKPARK

    VLAARDINGENOEST

    VLAARDINGEN CENTRUM

    NIEUWEKERK A/D IJSSEL

    ROTTERDAM ALEXANDER

    A20/E25

    A20/E25

    N15

    N57

    A13/E19

    A16/E19

    N471

    N209N209 N219

    5

    BERGEN

    BROEKPARK

    BERGEN

    BROEKPARK

    MELANCHTONPARK

    PLASWIJCKPARK

    PRINSENMOLENPARK

    KRALINGSE BOS

    KOOLSTEEBOS

    BERNISTE

    BERGSE

    ACHTERPLAS

    ZWANENMEER

    ROTTEMEREN

    ZEVENHUIZERPLAS

    KRALINGSE PLAS

    BERGSE

    ACHTERPLAS

    /VOORPLAS

    ARGONAUTENPARK

    ARGONAUTENPARK

    SCHIIEBROEKSEPARK

    SCHIIEBROEKSEPARK

    ENDRAGTSPOLDER

    ROTTEMEREN

    WOLLEFOPPENPARK

    WIJKTUIN

    HET LAGE

    BERGSCHE BOS

    WILGENPLASPARK

    PLASWIJCKPARK

    CAPELLE SCHOLLEVAAR

    DE MUNNIKENDEVEL

    DE HOGE DEVEL

    RUIGEPLAATBOS

    OUDELANDSEPARK

    ROTTERDAM STADION

    BARENDRECHT

    10

    BREEDEWATER

    QUACKJESWATER

    OOSTVOOMSE MEER

    OOSTVOOMSE MEERBRIELSE MEERSLUFTER

    BRIELSE MEER

    HARTE

    PARK

    PARK

    VOGELENZANG

    PUT VAN

    HEENVLIET

    LAKES

    ROADS

    TRAINS

    FLUVIALS

    TRAIN S TATIONS

    INDUSTRY

    NATURAL

    POBLATION

    2.5 KM INDUSTRY 2,2 KM INDUSTRY

    7,3 KM INDUSTRY

    AREA: 823HA

    27,2 KM POBLATION

    12,1 KM AGRICULTURE

    AREA:871HA

    21 KM POBLATION

    14,5 KM AGRICULTURE

    AREA: 1428 HA

    15,7 KM

    58,5 KM AGRICULTURE 10,8 KM INDUSTRY

    AREA: 1413 HA

    8,15 KM POBLATION

    25,8 KM AGRICULTURE 30,6 KM INDUSTRY

    AREA: 922 HA

    8,6 KM POBLATION

    27,5 KM AGRICULTURE

    CBA D

    A

    B D

    C

    BThe B strategy, think interms of population densityhas rotterdam and, as inzero environments econo-my, housing could createelements in height, todensify it promptly, andthus, change the conceptof raised low density hous-ing, and thus in the futureleave the possibility of

    releasing the current livingspaces.

    NEW REARRANGEMENTOF HOUSING AREA IN

    TOWER TYPOLOGY

    D The strategy D, is differentfrom the rest, since in thiscase we do not tighten anyvariable, but, reaprovecha-mos an existing industrythat are all those obsolete,giving the average user, ascenario in which you cancreate from trade to parksor recreation, to free choiceof the population of rotter-dam that will transform yourtaste.

    REACTIVATION OF

    UNUSED INDUSTRIAL

    AREAS THROUGH NATURE

    AND AGRICULTURE

    The A strategy is based oncreating intensive agricul-tural production in all areasof zero output chosen tovary both the direction of theflow, as the amount offinance led to that area, tosee how far he can rotter-dam even change if thesame power.

    A

    NEW HIGH PRODUCTION

    FARMLAND

    The C Strategy, has beendesigned based on pre-ex-isting industry already had,which was irregularproduction. Introducingintense production industryin those spaces with highrelation thereto, so that varyfrom the main variablessuch as flow and economyto rotterdam facade itself,creating an element in itsmost industrial.

    C

    NEW HIGH PRODUCTION

    INDUSTRIAL SPACES

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    A+B+C A+B+C+D B+D B+D A+B+C+D B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D B

    STRATEGY SCHEMES

  • 7/30/2019 Maquetacion Final

    4/4

    PROPOSAL SCHEME:

    This infrastructure is a limit and we want tobreak it, but above all, we want to weave withadjacent.

    Our proposal aims to create a series of

    actions, a number of provisions, a numberof spaces, and join them by railway and a

    highway underground, to hide the traffic carsand motorcycles, in turn also attach a set of

    rails bike.

    DISTANCE SCHEME:

    This green line is physically contained in

    1,600 m, and in this corridor, in the middlethere is a green band, which is going to act

    in large part, to the sides of this line are twosmall channels, which are to generate a

    series of allocations for the generation of

    different water sports activities such ascanoeing and kayaking.

    They also say that the width of this corridor isbetween 144 m wide.

    CONCEPT SCHEME:What we propose in this proposal is to link twocities, the city of Rotterdam, city to study, and

    the town of Delft, we seem to have generateda great opportunity with this green line, and so

    we act on this site, would generate one greenenvelopes in this corridor.

    Importantly, these two locations fail to touchand this is due to agriculture, so we aim to

    unite these two locations with a green corridor,and unite the towns to agriculture.

    ROAD SCHEME:

    Studying the economic composition ofRotterdam we have realized that there is aneconomic vacuum long wingspan, is the A4,a planned road, now is a green corridor is aroad that is cut and leave this space.

    It's really an infrastructure, but unoccupied.And linking the cities of Rotterdam andDelft.

    A

    A

    B

    B

    C

    C

    D

    D

    INFRASTRUCTURE AS LANDSCAPE,LANDSCAPE AS INFRASTRUCTURE

    ELENAFARINI + ANTONIAFERNANDEZ NIETO + GEMMAPERIBANEZ

    PABLO APARICIO

    JAIME MONGE

    JUANJO AIZCORBE

    BORJA FERNANDEZ 04/04t e r r it or ia l t igh t en upG7