aquinas argument
Post on 10-Apr-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
1/32
The Cosmological Argument For The
Existence of GodBy Sarah Allen
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
2/32
St. Thomas Aquinas wasSt. Thomas Aquinas wasbornborn
in the year 1225 and died inin the year 1225 and died in1274.1274.
He was an Italian priest of He was an Italian priest of the Catholic Church.the Catholic Church.
He was the foremostHe was the foremostclassical proponent of classical proponent of natural theology.natural theology.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
3/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
4/32
+ His 1st argument is based on motion.+ His 1st argument is based on motion.
Aquinas said, The first and more manifest way Aquinas said, The first and more manifest wayis the argument from motion. It is certain, andis the argument from motion. It is certain, andevident to our senses, that in the world someevident to our senses, that in the world somethings are in motion. Now whatever is moved isthings are in motion. Now whatever is moved ismoved by another, for nothing can be movedmoved by another, for nothing can be movedexcept it is in potentiality towards that which isexcept it is in potentiality towards that which ismoved whereas a thing moves in as much as itmoved whereas a thing moves in as much as it
is in act. For motion is nothing else than theis in act. For motion is nothing else than thereduction of something from potentiality toreduction of something from potentiality toactuality except by something in a state of actuality except by something in a state of actuality.actuality.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
5/32
This simply means that things only change frompotentiality to actuality because of someexternal influence.
He also says that it is therefore necessary toarrive at a prime mover, moved by no other and this everyone understands to be God
This in someway is like Aristotle's argumentabout explaining a perfect world.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
6/32
Aquinas's greatest work was the Summa , and it is the fullestpresentation of his views.
This order is cyclical. It begins with God and His existence inQuestion 2. The entire first part of the Summa deals with Godand His creation, which reaches its zenith in man. The FirstPart therefore ends with the treatise on man.
The second part of the Summa deals with man's purpose, themeaning of life, which is Happiness. The Ethics detailed in thispart summarize the ethics (Aristotelian in nature) which manmust follow to reach his intended destiny.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
7/32
HIS SECOND: EFFICIENT CAUSE ARGUMENT
Was madeMake up designer Lipstick
Was made.Publisher.Book
Was made.Trees and nature.Banana
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
8/32
SUMMARY OF EFFICIENT CAUSE ARGUMENT
He believed that nothing is an efficientcause of itself and that it is not possible for efficient causes to go back to infinity,
because if there is no efficient first cause,then here will not be any following causes.In Conclusion: In the words of St. Thomas
Aquinas, It is necessary to admit a firstefficient cause to which everyone gives
the name God (Summa Theologica)
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
9/32
THE THIRD: THE CONTINGENCY ANDNECESSITY ARGUMENT
Aquinas wrote: The third way is taken frompossibility and necessity.This means that if everything has thepossibility not to exist, then at some pointnothing existed! But if nothing existed then,nothing would exist now!!Clearly things exist now, so there must besomething that cannot not-exist. This musthave necessary existence which is notdependent upon anything else and this wecall God.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
10/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
11/32
FACTS ABOUT DAVID HUME
David Hume (1711-76), was a ScottishPhilosopher and Historian.He finished his first philosophical work, ATre atis e of H uman N atu re (1739-40).He was educated at Edinburgh and livedin France( 1734-37).
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
12/32
HIS ARGUMENT AGAINST AQUINASTHEORY.
David Hume attacked the idea that theFirst cause must be God. He believedstrongly that humans should only drawconclusions about things they hadexperience of ( He was an empiricist). Wedo not have experience of Universes beingcreated, therefore it is simply not possibleto argue from causes we witness withinthe universe to causes of it.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
13/32
OTHER ARGUMENTS BY HUME
Hume believed that cause and effectpatterns in our universe do not require anexplanation. They either simply exist asfacts, or are the results of our humanminds trying to shape or find order in our experience. If cause and effectrelationships cannot be assumed to betrue (guaranteed), then it cannot beargued that there was a first cause, ie.
God.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
14/32
OTHER ARGUMENTS AGAINST AQUINAS ARGUMENTS.
Why not a endless series of causes?Can there not be something that has alwaysexisted, but may cease to exist at some timein the future?Why should the chain of causes lead back toa single origin might there not be a wholecollection of separate origins.
Aquinas bases his argument on a contingentuniverse but in some ways the universe isnot contingent so not everything applies tothat theory.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
15/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
16/32
THE KALAM VERSION OF THECOSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Kalam is an Arabic word which means toargue or discuss. The Muslim scholars al-Kindi (9 th Century CE) and al-Ghazali(1058-1111) developed the kalamargument to explain Gods creation of theUniverse.
The Kalam argument says that everythingthat exists has cause of its existence andthis includes the universe as a whole.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
17/32
OTHER PARTS OF THE KALAM ARGUMENT
Al-Ghazali also argued that the universemust have a beginning: he rejected theidea of infinite time because of theunacceptable logical paradoxes that wouldresult from this.To conclude: There is a beginning to theuniverse, and the universe has a cause.This cause, at the beginning of theuniverse, is God.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
18/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
19/32
WILLIAM LANE CRAIG
William Lane Craig developed a modernversion of the argument in his book (1979)called The Kalam Cosmological Argument.
He argued as follows:The present moment would not exist in aninfinite universe since it makes no sense totalk about adding moments to an infinite time.This is essentially the same as the earlier argument but rephrased in terms of timerather than space.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
20/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
21/32
Craig also said that there couldnt havebeen an infinite series of past eventsbecause then each subsection of eventswould also equal the total number of events.
To conclude: Since everything that beginsto exist has a cause of its existence, andsince the universe began to exist, weconclude, therefore, the universe has a
cause of its existence.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
22/32
Craigs argument has two parts: first, heseeks to prove that the universe, logically,must have a first cause and then he triesto show that the act of creation must either
have been the result of choice or of anatural occurrence. Supporters say that asthe rules of nature did not exist before thebeginning of the universe, it cannot be aresult of natural cause. Therefore it has tohave come about by choice indicating apersonal God.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
23/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
24/32
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In 1947, there was a debate on BBC radiobetween F.C Copleston and BertrandRussell. Copleston supported thecosmological argument where as Russellopposed it. The debate focused on theThe Principle of Sufficient Reason first
introduced centuries earlier by GottfieldLeibniz (1646-1716).
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
25/32
COPLESTONS VERSION:
He said: Cause is a kind of sufficientreason. Only contingent beings can have acause. God is His own sufficient reasonand He is not the cause of Himself. Bysufficient reason, in the full sense, I meanan explanation for the existence of someparticular being.In other words, Copleston is saying thatthe most plausible explanation of theuniverse is God.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
26/32
COPLESTONS ARGUMENTCNTD.
Contingent things could have beenotherwise, and so do not contain of themselves a sufficient reason for their existence. All things in the universedepend on the other and so nothing in theuniverse can give a sufficient reason for its
existence.The reason for the existence, therefore,must live outside it. This necessary beingis God according to Copleston.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
27/32
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
28/32
RUSSELLS OPINION CONTINUED.
Russell concluded that I should say thatthe universe is just there, and thats all.
Hume had made similar objectioncenturies before.He also stated that if God is theexplanation of all, and everything requiresan explanation, then what is theexplanation for God? Why should God beself-explanatory in a way that the universe
is not?
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
29/32
The Debate details
There is a transcript of the debatein the cosmological argument for
the existence of God.They do not come to a conclusionbut they decide to move on toanother subject.
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
30/32
Other Modern Arguments John L.Mackie
Mackie responded to the criticisms of Aquinas. Modern science andmathematics had moved on from themedieval world-view, which was veryhierarchal.He defended the idea that there cannot bean infinite regression of causes.He also said that them movement mustbegin with
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
31/32
Other Modern Arguments
Anthony Kenny (1931 present)He bases his observations on NewtonsLaws on Motion.
Kenny thinks that Newtons Law proves Aquinas wrong. It is possible that an objectcan be in one of two states stationary or moving at a constant rate without any
external force acting on it .This would appear to mean that Aquinasstatement that nothing moves itself isincorrect..
-
8/8/2019 Aquinas Argument
32/32
The End
top related